Question map
With reference to the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS), consider the following statements : 1. IRNSS has three satellites in geostationary and four satellites in geosynchronous orbits. 2. IRNSS covers entire India and about 5500 sq. km beyond its borders. 3. India will have its own satellite navigation system with full global coverage by the middle of 2019. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A - only statement 1 is correct.
**Statement 1 is correct:** IRNSS will include three satellites in geostationary orbit and four satellites in geosynchronous orbit[1], giving a total constellation of seven satellites as confirmed by multiple sources.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The claim about coverage of "5500 sq. km beyond borders" is inaccurate. IRNSS provides coverage of the Indian continent and extending approximately 1,500 kilometers beyond[2]. This refers to 1,500 kilometers (distance), not 5,500 sq. km (area), making the statement factually wrong in both magnitude and units.
**Statement 3 is incorrect:** NavIC (Navigation with Indian Constellation), erstwhile known as Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS), is a regional navigation satellite system[3]. IRNSS/NavIC was always designed as a **regional** system, not a global navigation system. There was never a plan for full global coverage by 2019 or any other timeline.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct, making option A the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/satellite_missions/current_missions/irns_general.html
- [3] https://www.isro.gov.in/SatelliteNavigationServices.html
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Wolf in Sheep's Clothing'. It looks like a brutal data-heavy bouncer, but it is actually a conceptual sitter. The acronym IRNSS literally contains the word 'Regional', which directly contradicts Statement 3 ('Global coverage'). If you read the name, you solve 50% of the problem instantly.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS): how many satellites are in geostationary orbit and how many are in geosynchronous orbit?
- Statement 2: Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS): does it cover the entire territory of India and extend coverage about 5,500 square kilometres beyond India's borders?
- Statement 3: Did India plan to have its own satellite navigation system (IRNSS/NavIC) with full global coverage by mid‑2019 according to official ISRO timelines?
- Directly states the number of satellites in each orbit class for IRNSS.
- From a reputable source (ILRS / NASA GSFC satellite missions page).
- Repeats the exact breakdown of 3 geostationary and 4 geosynchronous satellites.
- Includes mission notes but the quoted line directly supports the orbit-count claim.
- Another ILRS page instance confirming the same 3 + 4 constellation description.
- Provides consistent corroboration across the ILRS site.
Identifies NavIC/IRNSS as India's autonomous regional satellite navigation system, connecting the statement to a named system students can research further.
A student can take the named system (NavIC/IRNSS) and look up standard design choices for regional navigation constellations (e.g., mix of GEO and GSO satellites).
Lists multiple IRNSS launches (IRNSS-1A through later satellites), showing the system is a multi-satellite constellation rather than a single satellite.
Count the launched IRNSS satellites from this list and then consult constellation-configuration patterns (regional systems often use both GSO and GEO) to narrow plausible distributions.
Mentions 'Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV)' and many geosynchronous/INSAT launches, showing that Indian launch practice distinguishes geosynchronous missions.
Use the fact that ISRO differentiates launch vehicles for geosynchronous payloads to check whether IRNSS satellites were launched by vehicles typically used for GEO/GSO insertion (compare PSLV vs GSLV use).
Explains different satellite orbital periods and heights as general background on satellite orbits and how orbit type relates to orbital period.
Combine this orbital-period concept with the known periods of geostationary/geosynchronous orbits (basic external fact) to judge whether IRNSS satellites' reported orbital periods would classify them as GEO or GSO.
Reiterates that satellite-aided navigation (including NavIC) is a key Indian space focus, reinforcing relevance of IRNSS as a navigation constellation (hence likely multi-orbit design).
Use this program-level fact to justify consulting technical summaries of NavIC/IRNSS (e.g., ISRO releases) about orbit types; program focus makes such documentation likely available.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.