Question map
If you withdraw ₹ 1,00,000 in cash from your Demand Deposit Account at your bank, the immediate effect on aggregate money supply in the economy will be
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because withdrawing cash from your demand deposit account merely changes the composition of money supply, not its total amount.
In a modern economy, money consists mainly of currency notes and coins issued by the monetary authority, and apart from[1] these, the balance in savings or current account deposits held by the public in commercial banks is also considered money.[1] Such deposits are called demand deposits as they are payable by the bank on demand from the account-holder.[1]
When you withdraw ₹1,00,000 in cash, your demand deposit decreases by ₹1,00,000, but the cash in your hand (currency with public) increases by ₹1,00,000. Since both demand deposits and currency are components of the money supply, the aggregate money supply remains unchanged—only its form has changed from deposit money to currency.
Options A and B are incorrect because they suggest a change in total money supply, which doesn't occur in a simple withdrawal. Option C is incorrect because there is no multiplier effect in the immediate withdrawal transaction; the money multiplier effect would come into play only when banks lend out deposits, not when depositors simply convert their deposits to cash.
Sources- [1] Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > THE SUPPLY OF MONEY : VARIOUS MEASURES > p. 47
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'Definition Check' disguised as a scenario. It tests if you truly understand that Money Supply is the sum of Currency and Demand Deposits. If you rely on rote memorization of formulas without understanding the components, you will overthink this. It is a pure NCERT concept.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does withdrawing ₹1,00,000 in cash from a demand deposit account immediately reduce the aggregate money supply in the economy by ₹1,00,000?
- Statement 2: Does withdrawing ₹1,00,000 in cash from a demand deposit account immediately increase the aggregate money supply in the economy by ₹1,00,000?
- Statement 3: Does withdrawing ₹1,00,000 in cash from a demand deposit account immediately increase the aggregate money supply in the economy by more than ₹1,00,000?
- Statement 4: Does withdrawing ₹1,00,000 in cash from a demand deposit account immediately leave the aggregate money supply in the economy unchanged?
- Defines money as consisting mainly of currency notes/coins plus balances in savings/current (demand) deposits.
- Implies conversion between demand deposits and currency leaves the aggregate (these components) unchanged.
- Explicitly defines demand deposits as funds withdrawable on demand and cheque-able — i.e., readily convertible to currency.
- Supports the view that a withdrawal is a change in composition (deposit → currency) rather than an immediate disappearance of money.
- Explains reserve requirement and money-creation via multiplier: reserves support deposits, so changes in bank reserves affect deposit creation capacity.
- Provides the caveat that while the immediate aggregate (currency + deposits) may not fall, withdrawals reduce bank reserves and can limit future money creation.
- Defines money supply components as currency notes + balances in demand (current/savings) accounts.
- Since both cash and demand deposits are counted as money, moving funds from a deposit to cash changes composition, not the total.
- Directly implies an immediate withdrawal converts one counted form of money into another, leaving aggregate unchanged.
- Explains how reserves support deposit levels and how deposits are part of money supply via the money multiplier.
- Shows that deposits (not just cash) constitute money; a mere conversion to cash does not create new money instantly.
- Implicates that only changes in deposit creation/lending (not a simple withdrawal) change aggregate supply.
- Describes fractional reserve banking where cash + deposits together determine total money created.
- Illustrates that deposits and cash both feature in the summed money stock; withdrawals shift the split between them.
- Supports the view that immediate effect of conversion (deposit→cash) is not an increase in aggregate money.
- Explicitly states that both currency (notes & coins) and balances in current/savings accounts (demand deposits) are counted as money.
- Implied consequence: converting demand deposits into currency shifts composition of money (deposit → currency) rather than adding a new category of money.
- Describes fractional reserve banking where banks lend a portion of deposits, creating additional deposits and thus expanding money supply.
- By contrast, mere withdrawal of deposits into cash does not by itself generate the lending/deposit-creation process that increases money beyond the amount withdrawn.
- Shows how reserves (CRR) support a multiple of deposits — i.e., money creation depends on reserves retained in banks.
- Withdrawal reduces bank deposits/reserves available for lending and so limits (rather than immediately increases) further money creation beyond the withdrawn amount.
- Defines a monetary aggregate (NM1) that explicitly includes both currency with the public and demand deposits.
- If both components are counted in the same aggregate, converting one (demand deposit) into the other (currency) keeps the aggregate unchanged.
- States that currency (notes/coins) and balances in demand deposits are both considered money in a modern economy.
- Supports the idea that a shift between these forms does not remove money from the measured supply.
- Defines demand deposits as funds withdrawable at any time and cheque-able, confirming their convertibility into cash on demand.
- Helps show the mechanical possibility of converting demand deposits into currency without changing the nature of money held by the public.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly solvable from Macroeconomics NCERT Class XII, Chapter 3 (Money and Banking).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The definition of Money Supply (M1/M3) and its components: Currency with Public + Demand Deposits.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the hierarchy: M0 (Reserve Money/High Powered Money), M1 (Narrow Money), M3 (Broad Money), and M4. Understand the Money Multiplier formula [(1+cdr)/(cdr+rdr)] and how changes in the Currency Deposit Ratio (cdr) affect the multiplier.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not just memorize 'M1 = C + DD'. Simulate transactions in your head: 'If I deposit cash, what happens? If I withdraw? If RBI buys bonds?' Distinguish between 'Immediate Accounting Effect' (this question) and 'Long-term Multiplier Effect'.
References identify currency and demand deposits as the main components counted as money; understanding these shows why converting one into the other does not immediately change aggregate money.
High-yield for UPSC: this concept is central to questions on money supply measures (M1, etc.), links to banking and macro topics, and enables answering questions about withdrawals, deposits and demonetization. Master via NCERTs and standard economy texts and apply to factual scenarios and policy questions.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > THE SUPPLY OF MONEY : VARIOUS MEASURES > p. 47
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Types of Deposits: > p. 52
Demand deposits are defined as withdrawable on demand and cheque-able, so withdrawing cash is a composition change rather than an immediate loss of money.
Important for exam items on liquidity, payment media and banking operations; helps explain why bank deposits function like cash and bridges topics across monetary economics and banking regulation. Use examples (withdrawals, cheques) to practice application.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Types of Deposits: > p. 52
- Understanding Economic Development. Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: MONEY AND CREDIT > Deposits with Banks > p. 39
References distinguish monetary base and money supply and show reserve ratios determine how reserves support deposits — withdrawals affect bank reserves and hence future deposit creation.
Essential for questions on how bank reserves, CRR and the money multiplier influence the broader money supply; helps answer nuanced questions about immediate vs medium-term effects (composition vs creation). Study balance-sheet examples and multiplier arithmetic.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 2.11 Money Circulation > p. 56
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) = Percentage of deposits which a bank must keep as cash reserves with the bank. > p. 42
The question hinges on the definition that both currency and demand deposits are included in money supply; converting between them affects composition, not total.
High-yield for UPSC: many questions test M1/M2 definitions and consequences of cash/deposit flows. Mastering this helps solve immediate-effect questions (withdrawals, transfers) and links to banking and payments topics. Revise central definitions and apply quick compositional checks in answer writing.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > THE SUPPLY OF MONEY : VARIOUS MEASURES > p. 47
- Understanding Economic Development. Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: MONEY AND CREDIT > Deposits with Banks > p. 39
Withdrawal changes banks' reserves and hence the capacity to create deposits later, so understanding the multiplier clarifies immediate vs subsequent effects.
Essential for questions on credit creation, reserve requirements, and how policy tools (CRR) affect money supply. Enables tackling dynamic questions (short-run vs long-run effects) and numerical multiplier problems in papers.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) = Percentage of deposits which a bank must keep as cash reserves with the bank. > p. 42
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 2.12 Money Creation > p. 58
The evidence contrasts an immediate compositional shift (cash vs deposit) with secondary effects (reduced deposits, altered lending) as seen during demonetisation and base-money changes.
Useful for essay/GS answers where nuance is required — distinguishes mechanical accounting effects from behavioural or policy-driven changes over time. Helps structure answers on demonetisation, liquidity shocks, and transmission of monetary policy.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Impact of Demonetization in the short run: > p. 57
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > 2.11 Money Circulation > p. 56
References state that currency and demand deposits are both counted as money, so conversion between them affects composition but not immediate aggregate.
High-yield for UPSC: many questions ask about M1/M2 definitions and implications of transactions (withdrawals/deposits). Mastering this clarifies when a transaction changes money supply versus when it just reclassifies components. Links to banking, payments, and monetary policy questions.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Money and Banking > THE SUPPLY OF MONEY : VARIOUS MEASURES > p. 47
- Understanding Economic Development. Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: MONEY AND CREDIT > Deposits with Banks > p. 39
The 'Next Logical Question' is about the *secondary* effect. While the immediate money supply is unchanged, withdrawing cash increases the Currency-Deposit Ratio (cdr). This mathematically reduces the Money Multiplier, meaning the *potential* future money supply will decrease as banks have less reserves to lend.
Use the 'Pocket vs. Wallet' logic. Your Demand Deposit is just a digital wallet; your Cash is a physical wallet. Moving money from your left pocket (Bank) to your right pocket (Cash) does not change your total wealth or the total money available to the public. Immediate effect = Zero change.
Link this to GS3 (Mobilization of Resources) and Financial Inclusion. Why does the government push for Jan Dhan and Digital Payments? Because depositing cash into banks (C -> DD) doesn't change immediate money supply, but it increases the Money Multiplier, allowing banks to create more credit for the economy.