Question map
In the context of India, which of the following factors is/are contributor/contributors to reducing the risk of a currency crisis? 1. The foreign currency earnings of India's IT sector 2. Increasing the government expenditure 3. Remittances from Indians abroad Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (1 and 3 only) because foreign currency earnings from India's IT sector and remittances from Indians abroad both contribute to reducing currency crisis risk, while increasing government expenditure does not.
Foreign currency flows into the home country due to exports of goods and services by a country, gifts or transfers from foreigners, and purchase of home country assets by foreigners[1]. India's IT sector exports services and earns foreign exchange, which strengthens the supply of foreign currency and reduces vulnerability to currency crises.
India is the largest recipient of remittances in the world, receiving around $100 billion in 2022, and the balance of invisibles has always been positive because India has always been a net exporter of services[3]. These remittances provide a steady inflow of foreign exchange, cushioning against currency volatility.
However, increasing government expenditure does not reduce currency crisis risk. Infrastructure spending and strengthening of private consumption contribute to raising the current account (CA) deficit[4], which actually increases demand for foreign currency and can worsen the balance of payments position. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct contributors to reducing currency crisis risk, making option B the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Supply of Foreign Exchange > p. 91
- [2] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 16: Balance of Payments > 2. Balance of Invisibles > p. 473
- [3] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Another case: > p. 108
- [4] https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/054/article-A001-en.xml
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Macroeconomic Stability' question testing the Twin Deficit link. It moves beyond rote memorization of BoP components to their functional impact on currency stability. If you understood the causes of the 1991 crisis (high fiscal deficit leading to external crisis), this was a sitter.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Do the foreign currency earnings of India's IT sector contribute to reducing the risk of a currency crisis in India?
- Statement 2: Does increasing government expenditure in India contribute to reducing the risk of a currency crisis in India?
- Statement 3: Do remittances from Indians abroad contribute to reducing the risk of a currency crisis in India?
- Explains that exports bring foreign currency into the home country, increasing supply of foreign exchange.
- By increasing foreign exchange supply, exports (including services like IT) relieve pressure on the currency market.
- States that rising exports raise foreign exchange flow and help overcome a BOP crisis.
- Links higher export earnings to improved ability to finance imports and attract investment, reducing crisis risk.
- Illustrates how capital outflows increase demand for foreign currency and cause rupee depreciation.
- Implies that foreign currency inflows (from exports/services) counteract such depreciation pressures.
Links fiscal discipline to external vulnerability by listing 'Reduce fiscal deficit to 3.5% of GDP' as a pre-condition before full convertibility, implying high fiscal deficits increase currency risk.
A student could infer that raising government expenditure (which tends to widen fiscal deficit) may increase currency crisis risk unless financed sustainably, and check India's deficit trajectory vs FX stability.
Describes how high fiscal and revenue deficits contributed to a Balance of Payments crisis pre-1991, connecting fiscal imbalance with external/ currency crises.
Use this historical pattern to judge whether increased government spending today (and its effect on deficits) could similarly strain reserves and FX stability.
Explains that government deficit can be reduced by raising taxes or reducing expenditure, showing government expenditure is a primary driver of fiscal deficit.
Combine this with evidence that deficits affect currency risk to evaluate whether increasing spending (without offsetting revenue) would raise currency crisis risk.
Shows that issuing debt in foreign currencies exposes the country to exchange rate risk and could lead to rupee volatility, linking government financing choices to FX vulnerability.
A student can assess whether increased domestic government spending is being financed by foreign-currency borrowing (vs. domestic taxes/rupee debt), which would matter for currency crisis risk.
Presents an exam-style item listing 'Increasing the government expenditure' as a candidate factor affecting currency crisis risk, indicating it's a debated/considered variable in this context.
Treat this as a prompt to investigate empirical/ theoretical arguments for and against spending increases reducing or raising currency crisis risk in India.
- Identifies that India’s balance of invisibles is positive in part because it is the largest recipient of remittances, tying remittances to net foreign exchange receipts.
- A positive invisibles account strengthens the overall BOP position, which lowers vulnerability to sudden currency pressure.
- States the large scale of remittances to India (around $100 billion in 2022), indicating a significant, stable source of foreign currency inflow.
- Large remittance inflows provide foreign exchange that can help meet external obligations and reduce dependence on volatile capital flows.
- Explains remittances as private transfers recorded in the BOP and notes they can constitute a significant portion of GDP for recipient countries.
- Framing remittances as important for developing economies implies their role in supporting external balances and economic stability.
- [THE VERDICT]: Conceptual Sitter. Directly solvable using NCERT Class XII Macroeconomics (Open Economy chapter) logic on Supply of Foreign Exchange.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Balance of Payments (BoP) mechanics—specifically the distinction between 'Sources of Supply' (Inflows) and 'Sources of Demand' (Outflows) for Forex.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Crisis Buffer' toolkit: Import Cover (months of imports reserves can pay), Short-term vs Long-term Debt ratio, NEER vs REER (competitiveness), Masala Bonds (rupee-denominated = low risk) vs ECBs (dollar-denominated = high risk), and the concept of 'Sterilization'.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not study Fiscal Policy and External Sector in silos. The key insight here is the 'Twin Deficit Hypothesis'—how domestic fiscal indiscipline (Statement 2) spills over into external currency vulnerability.
Exports, including IT services, bring foreign currency into India and increase the supply of foreign exchange.
High-yield for UPSC because it links trade/services receipts to exchange-rate dynamics and reserve adequacy; useful across questions on balance of payments, exchange rate policy, and service-sector contributions. Mastery enables explanation of how service exports stabilise currency and improve external balances.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Supply of Foreign Exchange > p. 91
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES OFTEN DEVALUE THEIR CURRENCY, IS IT TRUE? > p. 495
A weak BOP or sudden capital outflows raises demand for foreign currency, causing rupee depreciation and risk of a currency crisis.
Crucial for answering questions on macroeconomic stability, capital flows and crisis triggers; connects to topics like capital account volatility, reserves, and policy responses (devaluation, capital controls). Knowing this helps analyse vulnerability and mitigation measures.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > After 1993: > p. 40
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES OFTEN DEVALUE THEIR CURRENCY, IS IT TRUE? > p. 495
Foreign currency reserves and swap agreements provide a buffer to meet dollar demand and stabilise the exchange rate.
Important for policy-focused answers on crisis management and RBI tools; links to reserve adequacy, currency swap mechanisms and their role in reducing exchange-rate volatility. Enables evaluation of policy options to contain currency crises.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Currency Swap Agreement between two countries: > p. 102
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Indian Govt. securities will very soon join Global Bond Index > p. 48
High fiscal deficits from increased government expenditure can worsen balance-of-payments stress and raise vulnerability to currency crises.
This is high-yield for UPSC because questions often link fiscal policy to external sector stability; mastering it helps answer policy-economy questions on convertibility, crisis triggers and fiscal consolidation. It connects to macroeconomic management, public debt policy and external sector reforms, enabling candidates to evaluate trade-offs between fiscal stimulus and currency risk.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > Limitations > p. 499
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 6: Economic Planning in India > 2. Planning in Post-1991 or Post-Reforms Phase > p. 135
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Debt > p. 80
Borrowing or issuing debt in foreign currencies exposes the country to exchange-rate risk and can amplify currency instability.
Understanding this helps answer questions on external vulnerabilities, debt composition and instruments (e.g., Masala bonds versus foreign-currency bonds). It links public debt management to foreign exchange risk and informs policy choices on currency denomination of debt and reserve management.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Indian Govt. securities will very soon join Global Bond Index > p. 48
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > MASALA BOND > p. 266
Stable and diverse foreign exchange inflows—exports, transfers and swap lines—support currency stability and reduce crisis risk.
This concept is essential for questions on external sector resilience and crisis prevention strategies; it ties into trade policy, remittance economics and central bank tools (e.g., currency swaps, reserves). Mastery enables discussion of both market and policy instruments that stabilize the exchange rate.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Supply of Foreign Exchange > p. 91
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Currency Swap Agreement between two countries: > p. 102
Remittances are private transfers recorded in the current account and contribute to a positive invisibles balance, improving external stability.
High-yield for questions on external sector and currency risk because it links household/income flows to macro BOP outcomes; helps answer why some countries face less exchange-rate pressure despite limited export earnings. Connects to topics on current account composition, BOP adjustments, and policy responses.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 16: Balance of Payments > Remittances > p. 474
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 16: Balance of Payments > 2. Balance of Invisibles > p. 473
The 'Impossible Trinity' (Mundell-Fleming Trilemma). Since this question tests currency stability, the next logical step is the trade-off policy makers face: A country cannot simultaneously have a fixed exchange rate, free capital movement, and an independent monetary policy.
Apply the 'Inflation Logic' to Statement 2. Increasing government expenditure generally fuels demand and inflation. High inflation erodes domestic currency value (Purchasing Power Parity theory). A losing currency *increases* crisis risk. Thus, Statement 2 is a risk *enhancer*, not a reducer. Eliminate options C and D immediately.
Mains GS-3 (Economy): Link 'Remittances' to 'Soft Power' and 'Diaspora Diplomacy' (GS-2). India's resilience to currency shocks is partly due to the 'social capital' of its diaspora, acting as a counter-cyclical buffer during global slowdowns.