Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ā˜… Bookmarked
Loading…
Q24 (IAS/2019) Economy › Growth, Development, Poverty & Employment › Poverty measurement methods Official Key

In a given year in India, official poverty lines are higher in some States than in others because

Result
Your answer: —  Ā·  Correct: B
Explanation

The correct answer is option B because state-specific poverty lines essentially reflect the differences in the cost of living in different States of the country[3]. Poverty lines are based on state differences in price levels and are updated periodically using a system of state-by-state price indexes, which are estimated separately for rural and urban households[4]. The State with the highest prices has a poverty line which is 57 per cent higher than that for the State with lowest prices[2]. This clearly demonstrates that price level variations across states are the determining factor for differences in official poverty lines. Options A, C, and D are incorrect because poverty lines are not set based on poverty rates, Gross State Product, or quality of public distribution systems, but rather on the basis of state-specific price levels to account for differing costs of living.

Sources
  1. [1] https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/saarc_social_charter_status_report.pdf
  2. [2] https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/saarc_social_charter_status_report.pdf
  3. [3] https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/saarc_social_charter_status_report.pdf
  4. [4] https://www.princeton.edu/~deaton/downloads/deaton_kozel_great_indian_poverty_debate_wbro_2005.pdf
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
50%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. In a given year in India, official poverty lines are higher in some States than in others because [A] poverty rates vary from State to S…
At a glance
Origin: Mostly Current Affairs Fairness: Low / Borderline fairness Books / CA: 0/10 Ā· 7.5/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

This is a 'First Principles' Economy question. It tests if you understand that the Poverty Line is a monetary threshold derived from a consumption basket. If the basket (minimum needs) is standard, the only variable that changes the monetary threshold across regions is the Cost of Living (Price Levels).

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
In India in a given year, are official poverty lines higher in some States because poverty rates vary across States?
Origin: Web / Current Affairs Fairness: CA heavy Web-answerable

Web source
Presence: 5/5
"Such State specific poverty lines essentially reflect the differences in the cost of living in different States of the country. The State with the highest prices has a poverty line, which is 57 per cent higher than that for the State with lowest prices"
Why this source?
  • Explicitly states India uses State-specific poverty lines and explains why they differ.
  • Shows the primary reason for differences is variation in cost of living across States (not differences in poverty rates).
Web source
Presence: 4/5
"It needs to be highlighted that India is one among very few countries that has identified poverty lines at the sub-national level. The poverty ratios are estimated for different States of the country and have State specific poverty lines for rural and"
Why this source?
  • Notes that poverty lines and poverty ratios are estimated at the sub-national (State) level.
  • Confirms State-specific poverty lines exist for rural and urban areas, implying lines vary across States.
Web source
Presence: 3/5
"different poverty lines than the state- and sector-specific poverty lines of the Planning Commission."
Why this source?
  • Refers to the existence of 'state- and sector-specific poverty lines' used by the Planning Commission.
  • Indicates official practice of having different poverty lines across States (and sectors).

Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 8: Inclusive growth and issues > 8.17 Previous Years Questions > p. 282
Strength: 4/5
ā€œā€¢ 1. Which of the following can aid in furthering the Government's objective of inclusive growth? [2011] • (i) Promoting Self-Help Groups• (ii) Promoting Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises• (iii) Implementing the Right to Education Act• Select the correct answer using the codes given below:• (a) (i) only• (b) (i) & (ii) only• (c) (ii) & (iii) only• (d) (i), (ii) & (iii)• 2. In a given year in India, official poverty lines are higher in some States than in others because [2019] • (a) poverty rates vary from State to State• (b) price levels vary from State to State• (c) Gross State Product varies from State to State• (d) quality of public distribution varies from State to Stateā€
Why relevant

Contains the exact multiple‑choice question asking why official poverty lines differ across states, listing 'poverty rates vary' and 'price levels vary' as candidate reasons — showing these are standard hypotheses/patterns considered.

How to extend

A student could take this list of candidate reasons and check state price level (cost of living) data and state poverty estimates to see which correlate with higher official lines.

Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 3: Poverty, Inequality and Unemployment > 2020 > p. 59
Strength: 4/5
ā€œNo question 2019 • 1. In a given year in India, official poverty lines are higher in some States than in others because • (a) Poverty rates vary from state to state • (b) Price levels vary from state to state • (c) Gross state product varies from states to states • (d) Quality of public distribution varies from State to Stateā€
Why relevant

The same MCQ formulation appears again, indicating that variations in poverty rates and in price levels across states are commonly cited factors in official discussions of statewise poverty lines.

How to extend

Use statewise poverty rate tables alongside state price indices to test whether areas with higher poverty rates tend to have higher official poverty lines or whether cost differences explain them.

Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 11: Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues > Poverty line > p. 14
Strength: 5/5
ā€œNormally poverty is defned with poverty line. Te poverty line divides the population of the country as poor and non-poor. In India, the poverty line is defned on the basis of private consumption expenditure for buying both food and non-food items. Tus, the poverty line defnes a threshold income. Households earning below this threshold are considered poor. Diferent countries have diferent methods of defning the threshold income depending on local socio-economic needs. In India, the Planning Commission releases the poverty estimates in India.ā€
Why relevant

Defines the poverty line as based on private consumption expenditure for food and non‑food items and notes methods depend on local socio‑economic needs — implying local price/consumption patterns can affect the poverty line.

How to extend

Combine this rule with state Consumer Price Index (CPI) and typical consumption baskets to infer why some states' official lines might be higher (higher local prices or different consumption norms).

Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 11: Contemporary Socio-Economic Issues > Table 11.1 (Contd.) > p. 18
Strength: 4/5
ā€œNote: 1. Poverty Ratio of Assam is used for Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim and Tripura. 2. Poverty Line of Maharashtra and expenditure distribution of Goa are used to estimate poverty ratio of Goa. 3. Poverty Line of Himachal Pradesh and Expenditure distribution of Jammu & Kashmir are used to estimate Poverty Ratio of Jammu & Kashmir. 4. Poverty Ratio of Tamil Nadu is used for Pondicherry and Andaman and Nicobar Islands. 5. Urban Poverty Ratio of Punjab is used for both rural and urban poverty of Chandigarh. It may be seen from Table 11.1 that over 57 per cent of the total population of Odisha is below the poverty line followed by Bihar and Jharkhand (54.4%), Chhattisgarh (48.6%) Madhya Pradesh (48.6%), and Uttar Pradesh over (41%).ā€
Why relevant

Notes that poverty lines or poverty ratios of one state are sometimes used for small/other regions (e.g., 'Poverty Ratio of Assam is used for Arunachal Pradesh'), implying poverty lines are understood as state‑specific measures.

How to extend

A student could map which states have distinct official lines versus those that borrow another state's line and then compare with state poverty/price data to see if distinct lines align with differing poverty/price conditions.

Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > POVERTY IN INDIA > p. 81
Strength: 4/5
ā€œThe spatial patterns of incidences of poverty in India in 2011–12 have been plotted in (Fig. 15.8), while the percentages of poverty in different states are given in (Table 15.1). It may be seen from (Table 15.1) that acute poverty prevails in Odisha (57.0%), Bihar (54.4%), and Jharkhand (45.3%). The percentage of poverty is 5.4% in Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab 8.4%, Himachal Pradesh 10.0% Mizoram 12.6%, Goa 13.8%, Haryana 14% and Kerala 15%. The low incidence of poverty in the given states are mainly because of high literacy rate, agricultural and industrial development. The incidence of poverty is higher than the national average (27.5%) in the states of Odisha, Bihar Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra,Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.ā€
Why relevant

Provides concrete statewise poverty percentages showing large inter‑state variation (e.g., Odisha 57.0%, Punjab 8.4%), demonstrating that poverty rates do vary markedly across states.

How to extend

Using these state poverty rates plus knowledge of which states report higher official poverty lines, a student could check whether higher official lines coincide with higher measured poverty or instead track with prices.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

āœ“ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CAPF Ā· 2013 Ā· Q98 Relevance score: 0.18

The Government of India refers to the absolute poverty line in terms of

IAS Ā· 1999 Ā· Q10 Relevance score: -0.05

Persons below the poverty line in India are classified as such based on whether

IAS Ā· 1996 Ā· Q70 Relevance score: -1.67

Assertion (A) : Though India’s national income has gone up several fold since 1947, there has been no marked improvement in the per capita income level. Reason (R) : Sizeable proportion of the population of India is still living below the poverty line. In the context of the above two statements which one of the following is correct ?

IAS Ā· 1999 Ā· Q12 Relevance score: -3.94

Consider the following statements : Regional disparities in India are high and have been rising in recent years because I. there is persistent investment over time only in select locales. II. some areas are agro-climatically less conducive to development. III. some areas continue to face little or no agrarian transformation and the consequent lack of social and economic opportunities. IV. some areas have faced continuous political instability. Which of the above statements are correct ?

CDS-II Ā· 2018 Ā· Q72 Relevance score: -4.15

Statement I : The overall fiscal deficit of the States in India during 2017-2018 stayed above the FRBM threshold level of 3 percent for the third successive year. Statement I : Special Category States had run up a higher level of fiscal deficit in 2017-2018 compared to 2016-2017.