Question map
With reference to forced labour (Vishti) in India during the Gupta period, which one of the following statements is correct?
Explanation
Gupta inscriptions mention terms like klipta, bali, udranga, uparikara, and iranyavesti that meant forced labor.[1] Forced labour (vishti) in lieu of taxes was practised in some regions.[2] This indicates that vishti was treated as a form of tax obligation rather than wage-based employment, serving as a source of revenue for the state. The practice essentially substituted labor service for monetary taxation, making it a revenue mechanism for the Gupta administration.
Option B is incorrect as there is no evidence suggesting vishti was totally absent in specific regions like Madhya Pradesh and Kathiawar. Option C is incorrect because forced labor by definition was unpaid service rendered in lieu of taxes, not wage-based employment with weekly wages. Option D is also incorrect as there is no documented practice of specifically sending the eldest son as the forced laborer during the Gupta period.
Sources- [1] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 7: The Guptas > 7.5 Economic Condition > p. 95
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Term Definition' question derived directly from standard Ancient History texts (TN Board/RS Sharma). The question tests if you understand the *nature* of the term (tax/obligation) rather than just its translation. It rewards conceptual clarity over rote memorization of obscure facts.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was forced labour (Vishti) in India during the Gupta period considered a source of income for the state, functioning as a sort of tax paid by the people?
- Statement 2: Was forced labour (Vishti) in India during the Gupta period totally absent in the Madhya Pradesh and Kathiawar regions of the Gupta Empire?
- Statement 3: Were forced labourers (Vishti) in India during the Gupta period entitled to weekly wages?
- Statement 4: Was the practice during the Gupta period that the eldest son of a labourer was sent as the forced labourer (Vishti) in India?
- Specifically places discussion of revenue and the revenue department alongside terms for forced labour (klipta, bali, udranga, uparikara, iranyavesti).
- Naming forced-labour terms in the revenue context implies these labour obligations were treated within the state's fiscal/administrative framework.
- Connects forced labour terminology directly to records kept by revenue officials (akshapataladhikrita).
- Notes the rise of feudalism and that the system put people under hardship, which implies compulsory obligations such as labor services existed.
- Provides contextual support that social structures of the period enabled extraction of labour as an imposed duty from subjects.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.