Question map
With reference to Mian Tansen, which one of the following statements is not correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A because Akbar gave him the title "Mian," which is an honorific meaning learned man[2], not "Tansen." Tansen was his actual name, not a title bestowed by the emperor.
Option B is correct as he composed many songs in praise of Hindu deities[3]. Option C is also correct since he composed songs in praise of Kings and Emperors, including Islamic hymns in reverence to[4] Emperor Akbar[3]. Option D is correct as Tansen of Gwalior was credited with composing many ragas[5].
Therefore, option A is the only incorrect statement, making it the right answer to this question that asks which statement is "not correct."
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tansen
- [4] https://www.rudraveena.org/theBlogMusicFiles/Indian%20Music%20and%20Mian%20Tansen%20by%20Pt.%20Birendra%20Kishore%20Roy%20Chowdhury.pdf
- [5] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 14: The Mughal Empire > Music and Dance > p. 218
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Attribution Swap' trap. The question tests depth on a specific personality (Tansen) by mixing generic truths (B, C, D) with one specific historical falsehood (A). While standard books cover Tansen's ragas and patronage, the specific origin of his title requires reading the fine print in culture modules (CCRT/Nitin Singhania).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Explicitly states what Akbar bestowed: the passage says Akbar gave him the title 'Mian', an honorific.
- This addresses the question by identifying the specific title Akbar conferred (Mian), rather than 'Tansen'.
- Directly reports that Akbar 'bestowed upon him the honorific title ‘Mian’', linking the emperor to the conferment of 'Mian'.
- Supports answering whether Akbar gave the name 'Tansen' by showing the title credited to Akbar was 'Mian'.
- States that 'Emperor Akbar accorded the title 'Mian' to Tansen', again naming 'Mian' as the title from Akbar.
- Reinforces the point that the imperial title from Akbar was 'Mian', not explicitly 'Tansen'.
Ain-i-Akbari explicitly mentions 'Tansen of Gwalior' as patronised by Akbar, showing the imperial record identifies the musician by the name 'Tansen'.
A student could check whether Ain-i-Akbari or related court texts list this name as a formal title or as a personal/epithet, by consulting the primary text or modern editions/translations.
The Ain-i-Akbari is described as an official compendium compiled at Akbar's order, indicating that names and court designations were recorded in an authoritative source.
One could use this to prioritize searching Ain-i-Akbari/Akbar Nama entries for wording that indicates a conferred title versus a popular name.
Abu'l Fazl (patronised by Akbar) compiled Akbar Nama and Ain-i-Akbari, implying contemporaneous histories produced under Akbar's patronage are the right place to look for court-bestowed titles.
Use this pattern to examine these specific works (or their translations/indices) for any phrase like 'given the title' or 'conferred the name' regarding musicians.
An example is given of a Mughal emperor (Akbar II) conferring a title ('Raja' to Rammohan Rai), showing Mughal emperors did formally bestow titles.
Apply this general practice to Akbar's reign: a student could look for documentary evidence that Akbar similarly conferred honorifics on courtiers and musicians.
The Mughal court actively patronised musicians and promoted a syncretic culture, indicating prominent musicians like Tansen would have been publicly recognized at court.
Combine this with a world/primary-source search to see if such public recognition took the form of formal titles, nicknames, or simply patronage records.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.