With reference to Indian National Movement, consider the following pairs : Person Position held 1. Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru : President, All India Liberal Federation 2. K. C. Neogy : Member, The Constituent Assembly 3. P. C. Joshi : General Secretary, Communist Party of India Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Defines the Indian Liberal Federation (All India Liberal Federation) as a distinct organisation formed by moderate/liberal leaders who left Congress, identifying the institutional context in which a 'president' post would exist.

A student could look up lists of office-holders of this specific body (formed under Surendranath Banerjee) to check whether Sapru's name appears as president.

Lists Tej Bahadur Sapru explicitly among 'The Liberals' participating in conferences, showing he was a recognized liberal leader associated with groups that would participate in or form the Federation.

Use this evidence of Sapru's prominent liberal identity to search organisational records or leadership lists of the Liberal Federation for his role.

Refers to 'Members of the Indian Liberal Party such as Tej Bahadur Sapru...', linking Sapru to the organised liberal political grouping active in negotiations and pacts.

Since the Indian Liberal Party and the Indian Liberal Federation are closely related in historical usage, compare leadership lists of both bodies in secondary sources to test the presidency claim.

Again groups Sapru with named liberal leaders (Basu, C.Y. Chintamani, V.S. Srinivasa Sastri), indicating a circle of senior liberals who were likely candidates for federation leadership roles.

Cross-reference the names of prominent liberals given here with archival records or contemporary newspapers that reported appointments to Federation offices.

Shows Sapru's involvement in formal constitutional and parliamentary efforts (Commonwealth of India Bill), underscoring his stature as a senior constitutional liberal suitable for presidential office in liberal organisations.

Given his high profile in constitutional initiatives, check organisational histories of the Liberal Federation for whether such senior constitutionalists were elected president, and whether Sapru was among them.

States that members of the Constituent Assembly were chosen by provincial legislatures after 1945–46 elections (not by direct popular vote).

A student could check whether K. C. Neogy held a seat in any provincial legislature in 1946 or was nominated by one to infer likelihood of Assembly membership.

Notes the Assembly comprised representatives of all major communities and included 'all important personalities of India at that time.'

One could compare published lists of 'important personalities' or official member lists of the Constituent Assembly to see if K. C. Neogy's name appears.

Gives an explicit list of members of the Congress Experts Committee preparing material for the Assembly, illustrating that such preparatory bodies had named membership lists.

Use this pattern—consult analogous membership lists (Experts committees, Assembly rosters) to look for K. C. Neogy's inclusion or exclusion.

Records the Constituent Assembly's inaugural meeting date and presiding officer, implying official proceedings with attendance records.

A student could consult the Assembly's inaugural proceedings or attendance roll for August 14–15, 1947 to verify whether K. C. Neogy was present as a member.

Explains that the Assembly was dominated by the Indian National Congress but included varying groups, indicating membership was politicized and documented by party/region.

Cross-check party rosters and regional representation lists from 1946–47 to see if K. C. Neogy was nominated by a party or region to the Assembly.

Lists P.C. Joshi among the notable leaders of the CPI, indicating he was a prominent figure within the party.

A student could check lists or timelines of CPI office-holders (e.g., party leadership rolls) to see if prominent figures like Joshi held the General Secretary post.

Places P.C. Joshi among early communist leaders active in labour and party formation in the late 1920s, indicating long-term involvement.

Knowing Joshi's early and sustained prominence, a student could search period-specific party records or histories (1930s–1950s) when a General Secretaryship would likely be held.

Refers explicitly to the party post 'general secretary' (B.T. Ranadive) and links that office to major policy lines (the B.T. Ranadive line).

Since the title 'general secretary' is shown as an influential CPI office, a student could consult lists of individuals who held that specific office to confirm whether Joshi was among them.

Names other prominent CPI leaders (Ajoy Ghosh, S.A. Dange, S.V. Ghate) involved in party decisions at congresses, showing leadership roles rotated among recognizable figures.

A student could compare named leaders across congresses/periods to infer when leadership changed and then check if Joshi's prominence corresponds to a period when he might have been General Secretary.

Describes the formalisation and organisational development of the CPI in the 1920s, implying that by later decades the party had established offices and leadership structures.

Given that the CPI had formal structures early on, a student could look for documented holders of formal posts (like General Secretary) in party archives or standard histories to test the claim about Joshi.