Question map
Consider the following statements about Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India : 1. PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory. 2. A stagnant or declining population is one of the criteria for determining PVTG status. 3. There are 95 PVTGs officially notified in the country so far. 4. Irular and Konda Reddi tribes are included in the list of PVTGs. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate.
Statement 1 is correct as PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory (Andaman & Nicobar Islands)[2]. Statement 2 is also correct since a stagnant[5] or declining population is indeed one of the criteria for determining PVTG status. Statement 4 is correct as Konda Reddi (Kondareddis) [7]tribe is included in the list of PVTGs[6], and while Irular is also a recognized PVTG, the documents confirm at least one of these tribes mentioned in the statement.
However, statement 3 is incorrect. There are 75 PVTGs officially notified in India, not 95[8]. This makes option C (statements 1, 2, and 4) the correct combination, eliminating options A, B, and D which incorrectly include statement 3.
Sources- [1] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [2] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [3] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [4] https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Accelerated%20Development%20of%20Particularly%20Vulnerable%20Tribal%20Groups%20%28PVTGs%29_0.pdf
- [5] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-08/pvtg_d3_english_web.pdf
- [6] https://tribal.nic.in/DivisionsFiles/SwLPVTGs.pdf
- [7] https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Accelerated%20Development%20of%20Particularly%20Vulnerable%20Tribal%20Groups%20%28PVTGs%29_0.pdf
- [8] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-08/pvtg_d3_english_web.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Official Classification' question. Standard geography books discuss tribes generally, but this question demands the specific administrative data found on the Ministry of Tribal Affairs website. The key to cracking this wasn't memorizing 75 tribe names, but catching the wrong number in Statement 3.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: How many States and Union Territories in India have Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs)?
- Statement 2: Is a stagnant or declining population listed as one of the criteria for designating Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India?
- Statement 3: How many Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) are officially notified in India?
- Statement 4: Is the Irular tribe listed as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) in India?
- Statement 5: Is the Konda Reddi tribe listed as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) in India?
- Official Ministry of Tribal Affairs annual report language naming the geographic spread.
- Explicitly states the 75 identified PVTGs are spread across 18 States and the Union Territory of Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
- Chapter explicitly enumerates the territorial distribution of PVTGs.
- Clearly states '75 such groups in 18 States and one UT have been identified and categorized as Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs).'
Gives the current constitutional counts (28 states, 8 union territories), a needed baseline for counting which of these could have PVTGs.
A student can start from this full list (28+8) and eliminate states/UTs known to lack tribal populations to bound the possible number with PVTGs.
States that have no tribal communities (Chandigarh, Goa, Delhi, Haryana, Punjab) are explicitly listed, so they can likely be excluded when searching for PVTG presence.
Using this elimination, a student can subtract these five from the 36 total territories to narrow candidates for having PVTGs.
Shows tribal population is highly clustered (about 68% in 105 districts) and notes specific high-tribal districts and that Lakshadweep is effectively entirely tribal — indicating where PVTGs are more likely to be found.
A student could map the 105 high-tribe districts and high-tribe UTs like Lakshadweep to identify which states/UTs contain concentrated tribal populations likely to include PVTGs.
Lists states/UTs to which the Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) strategy was extended (a set of states targeted for tribal development), indicating a non-random set of territories with notable tribal populations.
A student might treat the TSP list as candidate territories more likely to include PVTGs and cross-check these against a map or additional sources to refine the count.
- Official Ministry of Tribal Affairs document listing criteria for PVTG determination.
- Explicitly includes 'A stagnant or declining population' as one of the criteria.
- DST/official technical document describing characteristics of PVTGs.
- Specifically enumerates 'a stagnant and declining population' among defining features.
- UNDP briefing on PVTGs summarizing characteristic criteria.
- Lists 'Decreasing or stagnant population growth' as one of the key characteristics used for identification.
Mentions a National Tribal Policy item explicitly covering 'conservation and development of particularly vulnerable tribal groups', implying PVTG designation is connected to development/conservation concerns and likely uses specific vulnerability-related criteria.
A student could look up the National Tribal Policy or Ministry of Tribal Affairs documents to see the listed criteria (e.g., demographic trends vs. socio-economic indicators).
Notes that the tribal population overall has been growing faster than the national average, providing a baseline demographic pattern for tribes.
Compare this general growth trend with any PVTG list to see if stagnant/declining population is singled out as an exception/criterion.
Gives counts and shows that the number of recognised scheduled tribes has increased over time, indicating administrative listing is responsive to ethnic identification and additions.
Use this to infer that formal lists (like PVTGs) are created by specific criteria — check official lists/gazette notifications for the exact criteria such as demographic decline.
Describes highly uneven spatial distribution and clustering of tribes, highlighting small/isolated district-level concentrations that could relate to vulnerability criteria (e.g., small population size, isolation).
A student could map PVTG locations against districts with small/clustered populations to see whether small/stagnant populations correlate with PVTG designation.
Identifies Scheduled Tribes as a socio-economically vulnerable group (high poverty rates), suggesting PVTG criteria may emphasise socio-economic vulnerability rather than solely demographic trends.
Check whether official PVTG criteria emphasise economic/health/education indicators over population growth metrics by consulting policy sources.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Authoritative UNDP summary explicitly states the central government recognition count.
- Directly names the number of tribal communities recognized as PVTGs.
- Official Ministry of Tribal Affairs annual report language confirming the count.
- Specifies 75 identified PVTGs and their geographic spread, reinforcing the official tally.
- Parliamentary (Rajya Sabha) document states the count in a written answer, an official source.
- Gives the same number (75) and notes the states/UTs where they are identified.
The National Tribal Policy snippet explicitly lists 'conservation and development of particularly vulnerable tribal groups' as a policy area, confirming PVTGs are a recognised sub‑category within tribal policy.
A student could use this to justify searching official Ministry of Tribal Affairs sources or policy documents (which the policy points to) for the official notified count of PVTGs.
This source gives the overall scale of Scheduled Tribes (saying 'more than 425 scheduled tribes'), implying PVTGs would be a smaller, defined subset within a larger set of STs.
A student could use the known large number of STs to reason that PVTGs are a distinct, enumerated subgroup and thus likely to have an official, finite notified count to look up.
Gives a precise figure '427 communities in the Scheduled Tribes' (Census 2011 reference), supporting the idea that official lists/counts for tribal categories are maintained and enumerated.
A student could infer that similarly enumerated lists exist for PVTGs and therefore seek the formal notified number in government lists or notifications.
Describes the Tribal Sub‑Plan (TSP) as an institutional strategy adopted across many states and UTs, indicating structured state/central programmes that likely rely on formal classifications (like PVTGs) for targeting.
Knowing TSP requires targeted groups to be identified, a student could check state/central TSP documents or implementation lists to find the officially notified PVTG count.
Lists states and active tribal organizations, showing that tribal issues are regionally diverse and administratively important — implying government uses formal classifications for policy/intervention.
A student could combine this regional focus with central policy (snippet 9) to examine state/central gazette notifications or ministry releases that enumerate PVTGs.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
Shows that India officially recognises hundreds of distinct Scheduled Tribe communities (now more than 425).
A student could use this to infer that checking an official consolidated list of STs/PVTGs (central or state) is necessary to see if 'Irular' appears among recognised communities.
Gives a specific headline figure (427 communities included as Scheduled Tribes) implying official catalogues exist and are finite.
One can extend this by looking up the official listing (by number/name) used by government agencies that also maintain the separate PVTG subset.
Defines Scheduled Tribes as communities whose names are listed in an official Schedule — indicating formal lists determine recognition.
A student could use this rule to distinguish between being a Scheduled Tribe and being a PVTG, and therefore seek the specific PVTG list to test whether Irular is included.
Describes typical characteristics of Scheduled Tribes (living in isolation, distinct socio-cultural traits) — traits often used to identify more vulnerable subgroups.
Knowing these traits, a student might compare the socio-economic/geographic profile of the Irular (from external sources) to criteria used to designate PVTGs and so judge the plausibility before checking official lists.
Notes the uneven, district-level clustering of tribal populations, and the existence of districts/UTs with very high tribal shares.
A student could use basic geography (states/districts where Irular are known to live) to narrow which state-level PVTG or ST lists to consult when verifying whether Irular are designated PVTG.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- The passage is a state/UT-wise official list titled 'Name of the Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group'.
- Entry number 7 in the list explicitly names 'Konda Reddi' as a PVTG.
- This document lists PVTGs by State (Andhra Pradesh including Telangana).
- It includes '7. Kondareddis' among the named PVTGs, matching the Konda Reddi entry.
Mentions the Ministry of Tribal Affairs policy explicitly refers to 'particularly vulnerable tribal groups' and 'scheduling and descheduling of tribes', implying an official category and lists exist.
A student could use this to know to consult the Ministry of Tribal Affairs' official PVTG list to check if Konda Reddi appears.
States there are over 425 Scheduled Tribes recognised by the government, showing the tribal landscape is large and subject to additions.
This suggests checking a focused PVTG subset of the larger Scheduled Tribes list to determine whether Konda Reddi is included.
Gives examples of tribe names including 'Reddi' (in Tamil Nadu), showing 'Reddi' occurs as a tribal name in these sources but does not mention 'Konda Reddi'.
A student could treat the presence of 'Reddi' as a cue to search specifically for variants like 'Konda Reddi' in regional/official lists to confirm PVTG status.
Lists states covered by the Tribal Sub-Plan (including Andhra Pradesh), indicating administrative frameworks exist at state level for tribal welfare where Konda Reddi might be located.
A student could look up Andhra Pradesh/related state PVTG lists or district-level records to see if Konda Reddi are designated as a PVTG locally or nationally.
Explains that tribal populations cluster geographically in specific districts, implying that identifying the district/region of a tribe helps locate relevant official listings.
A student could identify where Konda Reddi live geographically and then consult PVTG lists or district/state tribal welfare documents for that area.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Doable via Elimination. Statement 3 is the weak link. Source: Ministry of Tribal Affairs 'About Us' page.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Social Justice & Tribal Welfare (GS2). Whenever a sub-group (like PVTG) is mentioned in the news (e.g., PM-JANMAN scheme), you must check its official definition and count.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 4 Criteria (Pre-agricultural tech, Low literacy, Stagnant/declining population, Subsistence economy). Know the Origin (Dhebar Commission, 1973). Know the Leader (Odisha has the highest number: 13). Know the Rights (Habitat Rights under FRA 2006).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: UPSC loves 'Golden Numbers'. The count of PVTGs is 75. Statement 3 says 95. If you knew this one static fact, you could eliminate all other options. Always verify 'Counts' and 'Criteria' for any special government category.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
Explains clustering and concentration of tribal populations across districts and highlights a few UTs and districts with very high tribal proportions.
High-yield for questions on tribal demography and region-specific tribal policies; connects to topics on regional development, resource allocation and targeted welfare schemes. Mastery helps answer questions that ask which areas are tribal-majority or have concentrated tribal districts.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > Spatial Distribution of Scheduled Tribes > p. 16
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > Table 13.1). According to Niti Ayog, SC and ST account for more than 25 % of India's population. > p. 15
Describes the specific states and union territories designated for the Tribal Sub‑Plan mechanism for scheduled tribes.
Important for policy and governance questions about tribal welfare frameworks and targeted budgeting; useful for comparisons between scheme coverage and actual demographic needs, and for answering scheme‑based mains and prelims questions.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) > p. 27
Provides the current counts and names used to frame any question that compares or counts States and Union Territories.
Core constitutional knowledge often used in prelims and mains to situate demographic or policy facts; useful for elimination in multiple‑choice questions and for framing answers that require exact administrative counts or lists.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 41: Union Territories > Union Territories > p. 409
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 6: TERRITORY OF THE UNION > TERRITORY OF THE UNION > p. 73
Understanding whether tribal populations are growing, stagnant or declining is central to debates about identifying vulnerable groups.
High-yield for UPSC because demographic trends determine policy prioritisation and eligibility for targeted interventions; connects demography to social policy and development planning; useful for questions on population policy, minority welfare and scheme targeting.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > Source: Census of India, 2001. > p. 23
Spatial clustering of tribal groups influences vulnerability assessments and the delivery of targeted programmes.
Important for tackling region-specific policy questions and mapping developmental needs; links geography, electoral politics and resource allocation; enables answering questions on regional disparities and focused welfare measures.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > Spatial Distribution of Scheduled Tribes > p. 16
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > Table 13.1). provide an insight to the SC and ST population in the country. > p. 22
Knowledge of TSP and the National Tribal Policy is essential for understanding institutional mechanisms for tribal welfare and special-category designations.
Crucial for answering polity and governance questions on scheme design and implementation; connects constitutional provisions, welfare schemes and administrative responses to deprivation; helps analyze policy intent and effectiveness for vulnerable communities.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > The Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) > p. 27
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > The National Tribal Policy > p. 29
PVTGs are a recognised sub-category of tribal populations targeted for conservation and development measures.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often ask about special tribal categories and targeted interventions; mastering this helps answer questions on welfare policy, reservation/targeting, and tribal development schemes. It links to governance, social justice, and scheme evaluation questions.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Setting > The National Tribal Policy > p. 29
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'Habitat Rights' angle. PVTGs are the only group eligible for 'Habitat Rights' under the Forest Rights Act, 2006. The Baiga community (MP) was the first to get these rights. Expect a question linking PVTGs to FRA provisions.
The 'Famous Number' Rule. The number of PVTGs (75) is a static, well-known administrative fact, much like '28 States'. Statement 3 claims '95'. If you spot this error, you eliminate options A, B, and D instantly. The answer (C) emerges without needing to know if Irular or Konda Reddi are on the list.
Link Geography to Environment & Law: PVTGs often reside in core areas of Tiger Reserves or National Parks. The conflict between 'Critical Wildlife Habitats' (WLPA 1972) and 'PVTG Habitat Rights' (FRA 2006) is a major Mains theme regarding conservation vs. rights.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.