Question map
Consider the following statements about Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India : 1. PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory. 2. A stagnant or declining population is one of the criteria for determining PVTG status. 3. There are 95 PVTGs officially notified in the country so far. 4. Irular and Konda Reddi tribes are included in the list of PVTGs. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate.
Statement 1 is correct as PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory (Andaman & Nicobar Islands)[2]. Statement 2 is also correct since a stagnant[5] or declining population is indeed one of the criteria for determining PVTG status. Statement 4 is correct as Konda Reddi (Kondareddis) [7]tribe is included in the list of PVTGs[6], and while Irular is also a recognized PVTG, the documents confirm at least one of these tribes mentioned in the statement.
However, statement 3 is incorrect. There are 75 PVTGs officially notified in India, not 95[8]. This makes option C (statements 1, 2, and 4) the correct combination, eliminating options A, B, and D which incorrectly include statement 3.
Sources- [1] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [2] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [3] https://tribal.nic.in/downloads/Statistics/AnnualReport/AREnglish2324.pdf
- [4] https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Accelerated%20Development%20of%20Particularly%20Vulnerable%20Tribal%20Groups%20%28PVTGs%29_0.pdf
- [5] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-08/pvtg_d3_english_web.pdf
- [6] https://tribal.nic.in/DivisionsFiles/SwLPVTGs.pdf
- [7] https://dst.gov.in/sites/default/files/Accelerated%20Development%20of%20Particularly%20Vulnerable%20Tribal%20Groups%20%28PVTGs%29_0.pdf
- [8] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2023-08/pvtg_d3_english_web.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Official Classification' question. Standard geography books discuss tribes generally, but this question demands the specific administrative data found on the Ministry of Tribal Affairs website. The key to cracking this wasn't memorizing 75 tribe names, but catching the wrong number in Statement 3.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: How many States and Union Territories in India have Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs)?
- Statement 2: Is a stagnant or declining population listed as one of the criteria for designating Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India?
- Statement 3: How many Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) are officially notified in India?
- Statement 4: Is the Irular tribe listed as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) in India?
- Statement 5: Is the Konda Reddi tribe listed as a Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Group (PVTG) in India?
- Official Ministry of Tribal Affairs annual report language naming the geographic spread.
- Explicitly states the 75 identified PVTGs are spread across 18 States and the Union Territory of Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
- Chapter explicitly enumerates the territorial distribution of PVTGs.
- Clearly states '75 such groups in 18 States and one UT have been identified and categorized as Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs).'
Gives the current constitutional counts (28 states, 8 union territories), a needed baseline for counting which of these could have PVTGs.
A student can start from this full list (28+8) and eliminate states/UTs known to lack tribal populations to bound the possible number with PVTGs.
States that have no tribal communities (Chandigarh, Goa, Delhi, Haryana, Punjab) are explicitly listed, so they can likely be excluded when searching for PVTG presence.
Using this elimination, a student can subtract these five from the 36 total territories to narrow candidates for having PVTGs.
Shows tribal population is highly clustered (about 68% in 105 districts) and notes specific high-tribal districts and that Lakshadweep is effectively entirely tribal — indicating where PVTGs are more likely to be found.
A student could map the 105 high-tribe districts and high-tribe UTs like Lakshadweep to identify which states/UTs contain concentrated tribal populations likely to include PVTGs.
Lists states/UTs to which the Tribal Sub-Plan (TSP) strategy was extended (a set of states targeted for tribal development), indicating a non-random set of territories with notable tribal populations.
A student might treat the TSP list as candidate territories more likely to include PVTGs and cross-check these against a map or additional sources to refine the count.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.