Consider the following statements : 1. The definition of "Critical Wildlife Habitat" is incorporated in the Forest Rights Act, 2006. 2. For the first time in India, Baigas have been given Habitat Rights. 3. Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change officially decides and declares Habitat Rights for Primitive and Vulnerable Tribal Groups in any part of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

This snippet states the Forest Rights Act, 2006 deals with restitution of individual and community forest rights and aims to integrate conservation with livelihood rights.

A student could check the FRA text (definitions and schedules) to see if conservation-related technical terms like 'Critical Wildlife Habitat' are included or whether FRA uses only general terms about rights.

It shows that 'Critical tiger habitat' is a formal concept established by scientific criteria and notified by the State Govt in consultation with an Expert Committee, and that such notifications are expected to consider tribal/forest dweller rights.

One could use this pattern to ask whether FRA cross‑references such notified 'critical' habitat categories (e.g., in exemptions or procedures) or whether those categories are created under a different law (wildlife rules) rather than FRA itself.

This snippet emphasizes that wildlife and forest protection have separate legislative histories (Wildlife Protection Act) and that Parliament's power on wildlife has constitutional limits.

A student can infer it's plausible that definitions of technical habitat categories may be in wildlife legislation/regulations rather than in the FRA, so they should compare the acts' texts/definitions.

Describes the Wildlife Act's role in providing legal protection to habitats and creating project-specific conservation measures (e.g., for tigers), implying habitat categories are central to wildlife law.

Use this to suspect 'Critical Wildlife Habitat' may be a wildlife-law concept (or in related rules/guidelines) and verify by checking the Wildlife Protection Act and associated notifications versus the FRA.

Notes specific rights under the FRA (ownership of minor forest produce), showing the Act enumerates certain rights and definitions relevant to forest dwellers.

A student could inspect the FRA's list of recognised rights and definitions to see if it also defines habitat categories, or if it limits itself to rights and leaves habitat categories to wildlife/forest law.