Question map
If a particular plant species is placed under Schedule VI of The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, what is the implication ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1.
The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 was amended in 1991 to include Schedule VI, which specifically deals with specified plants. The primary implication of a plant being listed under this schedule is that its cultivation, collection, or possession is strictly regulated.
- Why Option 1 is correct: Section 17C of the Act mandates that no person shall cultivate a specified plant except under and in accordance with a licence granted by the Chief Wildlife Warden or an authorized officer. Examples of such plants include Beddomes’ cycad, Blue Vanda, and Pitcher plant.
- Why other options are incorrect: Option 2 is wrong because cultivation is permitted with a legal licence. Options 3 and 4 are incorrect because Schedule VI is based on the endangerment status and conservation needs of the species, rather than its genetic modification or invasive nature.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Sitter' found directly in standard texts like Shankar IAS or Majid Hussain. It rewards reading the 'Salient Features' of the Wildlife Protection Act rather than just memorizing animal names. The question tests legal structure (licensing vs. bans) rather than obscure trivia.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does Schedule VI of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 require a licence to cultivate plant species listed in Schedule VI?
- Statement 2: Are plant species listed under Schedule VI of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 completely banned from cultivation under any circumstances?
- Statement 3: Does listing under Schedule VI of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 indicate that a plant species is a genetically modified crop?
- Statement 4: Are plant species listed under Schedule VI of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 classified as invasive and harmful to the ecosystem?
- Explicitly lists 'Granting of licence (permits) for cultivation of specified but otherwise prohibited plants' as a provision of the Act.
- Links cultivation of certain protected plants to a licensing regime rather than unrestricted cultivation.
- Notes that 'specified plants' were added to the Act (1990), indicating plant-specific regulatory provisions were incorporated.
- Mentions the schedules framework, implying regulated categorization of species which supports the existence of schedule-based controls.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.