Question map
With reference to 'Eco-Sensitive Zones', which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Eco-Sensitive Zones are the areas that are declared under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. 2. The purpose of the declaration of Eco-Sensitive Zones is to prohibit all kinds of human activities in those zones except agriculture. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option D (Neither 1 nor 2) because both statements are incorrect.
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** ESZs are declared as per the 'Guidelines for Declaration of EZSs around National Parks and Sanctuaries'[1] issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, not directly under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. While activities in the protected areas themselves are governed by the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972[2], the ESZs around them are declared under separate guidelines using powers under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The purpose of declaring Eco-sensitive Zones around National Parks and Sanctuaries is to create some kind of "Shock Absorber" for the Protected Areas[3]. Moreover, activities in the eco-sensitive zones would be of a regulatory nature rather than prohibitive nature[4]. This means ESZs regulate activities rather than prohibiting all human activities except agriculture. Activities are regulated in the Eco-sensitive Zone[5], allowing controlled development while protecting the core protected areas.
Sources- [1] https://bluemapindia.org/marines-laws-and-policy/laws-governing-protection-of-coastal-and-marine-areas
- [2] https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ind52267.pdf
- [3] https://cpc.parivesh.nic.in/writereaddata/Guidelines_for_EcoSensitive_Zones_around_Protected_Areas.pdf
- [4] https://www.greentribunal.gov.in/sites/default/files/news_updates/Response%20Affidavit%20on%20behalf%20of%20R-%2015%20and%2016%20in%20OA%20No%20180%20of%202024%20(Satyendra%20Kumar%20Sharma%20Vs.%20UOI%20&%20Ors.).pdf
- [5] https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ind52267.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Statutory Swap' trap. UPSC tests if you know the specific 'Parent Act' for a designation (WPA 1972 vs EPA 1986). It also uses an 'Extreme Statement' check in Statement 2. In 2014, this was hot due to the Western Ghats reports (Gadgil/Kasturirangan), but today it is a static must-know concept.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Explicitly states how ESZs are declared: under specific 'Guidelines for Declaration of EZSs around National Parks and Sanctuaries.'
- Implicates ESZs are declared via administrative guidelines rather than by the Wildlife (Protection) Act itself.
- States that activities in protected areas are governed by the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, distinguishing that law's application to protected areas.
- Separately lists activities regulated in the Eco-sensitive Zone, implying ESZs are distinct regulatory zones rather than areas 'notified under' the Wildlife Act.
States create National Parks under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, showing the Act is used to declare and regulate certain categories of protected areas.
A student could contrast the list of protected area types explicitly created under the Act (e.g., national parks) with the legal basis for ESZs to see if ESZs are named there.
The snippet notes that Protected Areas (National Parks, Sanctuaries, Marine Biosphere Reserves) have been created under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to conserve marine life, indicating the Act’s scope for designating conservation zones.
One could check whether ESZs are listed alongside these protected-area categories in the Act or in rules made under it.
The Act provides legal support to conservation areas classified as National parks, sanctuaries and closed areas, implying a specific taxonomy of areas the Act covers.
A student could use this taxonomy to test whether ESZs fit any of these classifications or are referenced separately in environmental law.
The Act’s amendments and the description of what it covers (wildlife, specified plants, schedules) highlight that the Act defines specific protections and categories rather than a broad generic power to declare any environmental zone.
Using this, one could examine the Act’s text or amendment history to see if ESZs were introduced as a new category or left to another law/authority.
The Act led to declaration of large tracts as national parks, sanctuaries and biosphere areas (quantified here), reinforcing that the Act has been the instrument for specific types of declarations of protected land.
A student might compare the statutory instrument used for those declarations with the instrument cited for ESZ notifications (e.g., which ministry or Act issues ESZs).
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.