Question map
In rural road construction, the use of which of the following is preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability. or to reduce carbon footprint ? 1. Copper slag 2. Cold mix asphalt technology 3. Geotextiles 4. Hot mix asphalt technology 5. Portland cement Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1, 2, and 3 only) because these materials and techniques directly contribute to environmental sustainability and carbon footprint reduction in road construction.
- Copper Slag: A byproduct of copper smelting, its use as an aggregate substitute promotes waste recycling and reduces the need for destructive stone quarrying.
- Cold Mix Asphalt Technology: Unlike Hot Mix, this is processed at ambient temperatures, significantly reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions during construction.
- Geotextiles: These permeable synthetic fabrics enhance soil stability and drainage, extending the road's lifespan and reducing the requirement for frequent maintenance and raw material extraction.
In contrast, Hot Mix Asphalt (4) requires high temperatures, leading to high carbon emissions. Portland Cement (5) production is one of the largest industrial sources of CO2. Therefore, while functional, they are not "preferred" for reducing the carbon footprint compared to the alternatives in Option 1.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question rewards 'Environmental Common Sense' over rote learning. It tests the application of Circular Economy principles (Waste to Wealth) in infrastructure. If a technology uses waste (Slag) or avoids heating (Cold mix), it is sustainable; if it burns fuel (Hot mix) or calcines limestone (Cement), it is the polluter.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the use of copper slag in rural road construction preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability or reducing carbon footprint?
- Statement 2: Is the use of cold mix asphalt technology in rural road construction preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability or reducing carbon footprint?
- Statement 3: Is the use of geotextiles in rural road construction preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability or reducing carbon footprint?
- Statement 4: Is the use of hot mix asphalt technology in rural road construction preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability or reducing carbon footprint?
- Statement 5: Is the use of Portland cement in rural road construction preferred for ensuring environmental sustainability or reducing carbon footprint?
Gives a clear example/policy pattern of promoting use of industrial/municipal waste (plastic waste) for road construction to facilitate waste utilisation and recycling.
A student could treat copper slag as another industrial waste stream and compare its availability, handling and substitution potential for conventional road materials to judge sustainability benefits.
Shows that replacing conventional cement or aggregates with industrial by‑products (fly ash) can reduce construction impacts and costs.
One can analogously assess whether copper slag can substitute cement/aggregates and estimate likely reductions in raw material extraction and embodied emissions.
Recommends promoting use of fly ash and manufactured alternatives (M‑sand) for construction to reduce pressure on natural resources.
Compare copper slag’s material properties to fly ash/M‑sand to evaluate whether it is a viable sustainable substitute in rural road mixes.
Frames sustainable development as integrating economic development with environmental protection and highlights recycling scrap metals where reserves are limited.
Use this principle to weigh copper slag reuse: if slag reduces need for virgin aggregates/metals and conserves resources, it supports sustainability.
Defines environmental sustainability to include reducing carbon footprint and other environmental impacts as assessment criteria.
A student could estimate carbon footprint differences between conventional road materials and copper slag‑amended mixes to judge preference.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.