Question map
With reference to 'Forest Carbon Partnership Facility', which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. It is a global partnership of governments, businesses, civil society and indigenous peoples. 2. It provides financial aid to universities, individual scientists and institutions involved in scientific forestry research to develop eco-friendly and climate adaptation technologies for sustainable forest management. 3. It assists the countries in their 'REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation+)' efforts by providing them with financial and technical assistance. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) is a global partnership of governments, businesses,[1] civil society, and[2] Indigenous Peoples, making statement 1 correct. The FCPF was created to assist developing countries to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, enhance and conserve forest carbon stocks, and sustainably manage forests (REDD+)[3], and it helps developing countries set up both forest cover and deforestation and forest degradation reference levels, MRV systems and designing a REDD+ national strategy[4], confirming statement 3 is correct.
However, statement 2 is incorrect. The FCPF does not provide financial aid to universities, individual scientists, or research institutions for scientific forestry research. Instead, it supports countries' efforts to achieve emission reductions from deforestation and/or forest degradation[5] through country-level programs. Administered by The World Bank, the FCPF consists of a Readiness Fund and a Carbon Fund[3] that work directly with countries rather than individual researchers or institutions.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 3 are correct, making option C the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/FCPF%20AR%20FY15%2011%204%20%28web%29_0.pdf
- [2] https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/FCPF%20AR%20FY15%2011%204%20%28web%29_0.pdf
- [3] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Forest Carbon Partnership Facility > p. 344
- [4] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1462901110001449
- [5] https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/system/files/documents/FCPF%20AR%20FY15%2011%204%20%28web%29_0.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewA classic 'Institutional Architecture' question. While Statement 3 is standard textbook material (Shankar IAS), Statement 2 is a 'Scope Mismatch' trapāmultilateral banks fund nations, not individual professors. The key is to identify the *primary recipient* of the fund.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility a global partnership comprising governments, businesses, civil society and indigenous peoples?
- Statement 2: Does the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility provide financial aid to universities, individual scientists, and research institutions for scientific forestry research to develop eco-friendly and climate adaptation technologies for sustainable forest management?
- Statement 3: Does the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility assist countries' REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) efforts by providing financial and technical assistance?
- Explicitly calls the FCPF a 'global partnership' and names governments and businesses as partners.
- Directly supports the claim's 'global partnership' and the involvement of governments and businesses.
- Specifically lists 'civil society, and Indigenous Peoples (IP)' as part of the FCPF's constituency.
- Connects these stakeholder groups to the FCPF's REDD+ focus, showing active inclusion of civil society and indigenous peoples.
- Notes financial contributors include developed countries (governments) and one private sector participant (business).
- States the FCPF 'has six categories of observers, including IP and Civil Society Organizations (CSO).', confirming participation of indigenous peoples and civil society.
Identifies the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) as a World Bank programme with Readiness and Carbon Funds focused on REDD+, indicating it operates at international scale and through formal funding mechanisms.
A student could infer that World Bankāadministered programmes often engage multiple country governments and partner stakeholders and therefore check FCPF governance documents for multiāstakeholder composition.
Describes the Warsaw Framework for REDD+ where governments agreed decisions and mechanisms for resultsābased payments, showing REDD+ processes involve national governments and international policy frameworks.
One could extend this by noting FCPF supports REDD+ and therefore likely follows multisectoral REDD+ practicesāso verify whether FCPF includes nonāgovernmental stakeholders alongside governments.
States incentives from REDD+ would be passed to local communities involved in protection and management of forests, indicating REDD+ programmes engage local communities/indigenous peoples.
Use this to hypothesize that FCPF (a REDD+ facility) engages indigenous/local communities and then check FCPF membership or participant lists for such representation.
Mentions the Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform within UNFCCC, showing international climate processes include explicit platforms for indigenous and civil society engagement.
A student could reasonably suspect FCPF, operating in the same REDD+/UNFCCC ecosystem, similarly includes indigenous and civil society representation and then confirm via FCPF governance sources.
Describes Joint Forest Management as a formal partnership between forest departments and local communities, exemplifying a common pattern of multiāstakeholder forest governance.
Apply this general partnership model to international forest programmes like FCPF to motivate checking whether its institutional design includes governments plus community and other nonāstate actors.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.