With reference to 'Forest Carbon Partnership Facility', which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. It is a global partnership of governments, businesses, civil society and indigenous peoples. 2. It provides financial aid to universities, individual scientists and institutions involved in scientific forestry research to develop eco-friendly and climate adaptation technologies for sustainable forest management. 3. It assists the countries in their 'REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation+)' efforts by providing them with financial and technical assistance. Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Identifies the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) as a World Bank programme with Readiness and Carbon Funds focused on REDD+, indicating it operates at international scale and through formal funding mechanisms.

A student could infer that World Bank–administered programmes often engage multiple country governments and partner stakeholders and therefore check FCPF governance documents for multi‑stakeholder composition.

Describes the Warsaw Framework for REDD+ where governments agreed decisions and mechanisms for results‑based payments, showing REDD+ processes involve national governments and international policy frameworks.

One could extend this by noting FCPF supports REDD+ and therefore likely follows multisectoral REDD+ practices—so verify whether FCPF includes non‑governmental stakeholders alongside governments.

States incentives from REDD+ would be passed to local communities involved in protection and management of forests, indicating REDD+ programmes engage local communities/indigenous peoples.

Use this to hypothesize that FCPF (a REDD+ facility) engages indigenous/local communities and then check FCPF membership or participant lists for such representation.

Mentions the Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform within UNFCCC, showing international climate processes include explicit platforms for indigenous and civil society engagement.

A student could reasonably suspect FCPF, operating in the same REDD+/UNFCCC ecosystem, similarly includes indigenous and civil society representation and then confirm via FCPF governance sources.

Describes Joint Forest Management as a formal partnership between forest departments and local communities, exemplifying a common pattern of multi‑stakeholder forest governance.

Apply this general partnership model to international forest programmes like FCPF to motivate checking whether its institutional design includes governments plus community and other non‑state actors.

Describes the FCPF as a World Bank programme with a Readiness Fund and Carbon Fund focused on REDD+ and supporting developing countries to reduce deforestation and sustainably manage forests.

A student could use this to ask whether World Bank REDD+ funds typically finance research or are instead directed at country-level readiness and implementation, by checking standard World Bank fund disbursement rules.

The Forest Investment Program (another World Bank‑administered forest fund) provides scaled-up financing for readiness reforms and public and private investments for sustainable forest management.

Compare FIP’s stated financing recipients (public/private investments) to FCPF’s Readiness/Carbon Fund to infer whether such funds normally include grants to universities or research institutions.

The Special Climate Change Fund explicitly finances projects relating to adaptation, technology transfer and capacity building across sectors including forestry.

A student could infer that multilateral climate funds sometimes fund technology/ capacity building in forestry and then check whether FCPF’s mandate or eligibility lists include research institutions or individual scientists.

The Congo Basin Forest Fund (a multi‑donor forest fund) aims to develop capacity of people and institutions and provides accessible funding while encouraging governments, civil society, NGOs and private sector to share expertise.

Use this as an example that some forest funds explicitly fund institutional capacity and projects, prompting investigation whether FCPF follows a similar recipient profile (institutions vs individuals).

International conservation bodies collaborate with governments and research institutions to 'support scientific research' into ecosystems and their climate role.

A student could generalize that international climate programs often fund or partner with research institutions, then check FCPF project lists to see if research grants to universities or scientists appear.