Question map
Which one of the following categories of Fundamental Rights incorporates protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4: Right to Equality. Under the Indian Constitution, the Right to Equality is a cluster of fundamental rights spanning from Articles 14 to 18. Specifically, Article 17 expressly abolishes "Untouchability" and forbids its practice in any form, making it a punishable offense.
The classification is as follows:
- Right to Equality (Articles 14β18): Includes Article 17, which protects individuals from discrimination based on untouchability.
- Right against Exploitation (Articles 23β24): Deals with human trafficking and forced labor, not caste-based social exclusion.
- Right to Freedom (Articles 19β22): Covers liberties like speech and movement.
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32): Provides the mechanism to approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of rights but is not the substantive right itself.
Since Article 17 falls squarely within the 14β18 bracket, protection against untouchability is categorized under the Right to Equality.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'Sitter'βa fundamental static question that rewards basic structural memorization of the Constitution. It requires no current affairs or deep analysis, just the ability to map Article 17 to its parent header. If you miss this, you are out of the race.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Right against Exploitation under the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution of India include protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
- Statement 2: Does the Right to Freedom under the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution of India include protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
- Statement 3: Does the Right to Constitutional Remedies under the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution of India include protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
- Statement 4: Does the Right to Equality under the Fundamental Rights of the Constitution of India include protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination?
- This is an official Constitution text listing Part III fundamental rights by article numbers.
- Under 'Right to Equality' it explicitly lists '17. Abolition of Untouchability', placing untouchability within Right to Equality.
- If abolition of untouchability is a provision of Right to Equality, it is not placed under the separate 'Right against Exploitation' in this source.
- Lists the six fundamental rights as distinct categories, including both 'Right to Equality' and 'Right against exploitation' separately.
- Shows that 'Right against exploitation' is a separate fundamental-right heading (so untouchability would be addressed under the listed 'Right to Equality' rather than under 'Right against exploitation').
- Summarizes the six basic fundamental rights and names 'right to equality' and 'right against exploitation' as distinct items.
- Supports the view that untouchability (abolition) would fall under the Right to Equality category rather than under Right against Exploitation.
Specifies Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes its enforcement an offence, identifying untouchability as a distinct constitutional provision.
A student can check which Fundamental Right grouping contains Article 17 to see whether untouchability is placed under Right to Equality or another group.
Lists the Right to Equality as covering Articles 14β18 (the range that includes Article 17).
Combine this grouping with Article 17 (from snippet 10) to infer untouchability is treated under Right to Equality rather than under Right against Exploitation.
Describes the scope of Article 23 (Right against Exploitation): prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour, and notes non-discrimination in state-imposed compulsory service on grounds including caste.
Use this to see that Right against Exploitation addresses specific practices (traffic, forced labour) and not explicitly untouchability, suggesting untouchability may belong elsewhere.
Explains that the Right against Exploitation enumerates three specific evils (traffic in human beings, forced labour, begar), giving a pattern of narrowly defined prohibitions under that right.
A student can compare these specific evils with the practice of untouchability to judge whether untouchability fits the pattern covered by Right against Exploitation.
Presents a direct exam-style question asking which Fundamental Right incorporates protection against untouchability, listing Right against Exploitation and Right to Equality as options β indicating this is a recognized point of classification.
A student can treat this as a prompt to check the constitutional placement of Article 17 and the thematic scope of the two candidate rights to resolve the question.
- Article 17 expressly abolishes untouchability and forbids its practice in any form.
- Article 17 creates a penal/enforceable disability for practicing untouchability, showing it is a standalone provision.
- The Right to Freedom is located in Articles 19β22, distinct from Article 17.
- The Right to Equality is listed as Articles 14β18, which places Article 17 (abolition of untouchability) within Right to Equality, not Right to Freedom.
- Article 17 expressly abolishes untouchability and forbids its practice in any form.
- Enforcement of disabilities arising from untouchability is an offence punishable by law, linking untouchability to enforceable fundamental-right protection.
- Right to Constitutional Remedies gives citizens the right to approach High Courts or the Supreme Court to get any Fundamental Right restored.
- Courts can issue orders and directives for enforcement of rights, enabling remedies for violations such as untouchability.
- Article 32 is described as the constitutional remedy for enforcement of Fundamental Rights included in Part III.
- The right to bring proceedings under Article 32 is itself a Fundamental Right, making enforcement mechanisms central to protecting substantive rights like abolition of untouchability.
- Explicitly classifies Right to Equality as Articles 14β18 and lists 'Abolition of untouchability and prohibition of its practice (Article 17)' under that category.
- Directly places abolition of untouchability within the legal scope of the Right to Equality.
- Enumerates civil equality provisions and includes 'Abolition of untouchability (Article 17)' alongside Articles 14β16.
- Connects the Preamble's guarantee of equality of status and opportunity to the constitutional abolition of untouchability.
- States that the practice of untouchability has been abolished under the right to equality.
- Explains untouchability as a crude manifestation of inequality that the Right to Equality addresses.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct hit from Laxmikanth (Chapter: Fundamental Rights) or NCERT Class XI (Indian Constitution at Work).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The Classification of Part III. UPSC loves testing the 'Parent Category' rather than just the Article number.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Map the 'Evils' to their 'Headers': 1. Untouchability (Art 17) -> Right to Equality. 2. Titles (Art 18) -> Right to Equality. 3. Forced Labor/Begar (Art 23) -> Right against Exploitation. 4. Child Labor (Art 24) -> Right against Exploitation. 5. Minority Institutions (Art 30) -> Cultural & Educational Rights.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not just memorize 'Article 17 = Untouchability'. Memorize the hierarchy: Part III -> Category (Equality) -> Article (17). The confusion trap is always between 'Exploitation' (social oppression) and 'Equality' (status denial).
Fundamental Rights are grouped by article ranges so specific rights (e.g., Article 17) can be located within the appropriate category (Right to Equality vs Right against Exploitation).
High-yield for UPSC: questions often require identifying which Article belongs to which Fundamental Right. Mastering article ranges helps resolve fact-patterns about which right applies and links constitutional provisions to remedies.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > III I Fundamental Rights > p. 30
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > CHAP. 8 Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties 97 > p. 97
Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes enforcement of disabilities arising from it an offence.
Very important: Article 17 is a frequently tested specific provision on social discrimination and connects to related statutes and social-justice topics; knowing it lets aspirants distinguish the Right to Equality from other rights.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > D I Abolition of Untouchability > p. 84
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > Right to Equality > p. 80
Right against Exploitation (Articles 23β24) specifically prohibits trafficking in human beings and forced labour.
High-yield: distinguishes types of protections under Part III; helps answer questions that require mapping conduct (trafficking, forced labour, untouchability) to the correct constitutional provision and related penal statutes.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > INTRODUCTION TO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA > p. 138
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > III I Fundamental Rights > p. 30
Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes its practice punishable under law.
High-yield for constitutional law questions: knowing Article 17 clarifies which Fundamental Right addresses social discrimination and links to related penal statutes; useful in questions on social justice, affirmative action, and rights enforcement.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > D I Abolition of Untouchability > p. 84
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > Right to Equality > p. 80
Articles 14β18 constitute Right to Equality while Articles 19β22 constitute Right to Freedom, placing abolition of untouchability under Equality.
Crucial for mapping which article/cluster handles specific protections; helps answer direct-knowledge and comparative questions that ask which Fundamental Right covers a given protection or prohibition.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > III I Fundamental Rights > p. 30
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > III I Fundamental Rights > p. 30
Part III groups Fundamental Rights into categories and provides the framework for enforcement and remedies.
Understanding the classification and remedy structure (e.g., Article 32) is vital for framing legal-constitutional answers and for issues on enforceability of rights and constitutional litigation strategies.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties IJl > p. 117
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > Exceptions to FundaΒ· mental Rights. > p. 96
Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes its practice an offence, providing the substantive prohibition against caste-based exclusion.
High-yield for questions on Fundamental Rights and social justice; connects to laws implementing Article 17 (penal provisions) and to constitutional discussions on equality and caste discrimination. Mastery helps answer direct MCQs and essay/ethics questions on abolition and enforcement.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > D I Abolition of Untouchability > p. 84
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > Right to Equality > p. 80
The term 'Untouchability' is NOT defined in the Constitution, nor in the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955. The Mysore High Court clarified it refers to the 'historical practice', not a literal grammatical sense. This definition gap is a prime candidate for a future statement-based question.
Semantic Logic: 'Exploitation' (Articles 23-24) in the Constitution specifically refers to physical extraction of labor or bodies (Trafficking, Begar, Child Labor). 'Untouchability' is about social exclusion and status hierarchy. Since it denies equal status, it must belong to the Right to Equality.
Mains GS-2 (Social Justice): Article 17 is the 'Constitutional Promise', but it has no teeth without statutes. Link it to the 'Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955' (civil liability) and the 'SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989' (criminal liability). This progression (Constitution -> Civil Law -> Criminal Law) is the standard answer structure.