Question map
With reference to the funds under Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), which of the following statements are correct ? 1. MPLADS funds must be used to create durable assets like physical infrastructure for health, education, etc. 2. A specified portion of each MP's fund must benefit SC/ST populations. 3. MPLADS funds are sanctioned on yearly basis and the unused funds cannot be carried forward to the next year. 4. The district authority must inspect at least 10% of all works under implementation every year. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (1, 2 and 4 only). The explanation for each statement is as follows:
- Statement 1 is correct: The primary objective of MPLADS is to enable MPs to recommend works of developmental nature with emphasis on the creation of durable community assets (e.g., drinking water, education, public health, and roads) based on locally felt needs.
- Statement 2 is correct: Guidelines mandate that MPs must recommend works costing at least 15% of their annual entitlement for areas inhabited by Scheduled Caste populations and 7.5% for Scheduled Tribe populations.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: MPLADS funds are non-lapsable. Unused funds from a particular year are carried forward to the subsequent years within the MP's tenure.
- Statement 4 is correct: To ensure accountability, the guidelines stipulate that the District Authority must inspect at least 10% of the works under implementation every year.
Since statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate, Option 4 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question tests 'Scheme Mechanics' rather than just 'Scheme Objectives'. While Statement 1 is basic, Statements 2, 3, and 4 require reading the 'Operational Guidelines' (the fine print). The pivot is Statement 3: knowing MPLADS is a 'non-lapsable' fund (a rare exception to the general Rule of Lapse) allows you to eliminate heavily.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Under the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), are funds required to be used for creation of durable assets such as physical infrastructure for health, education and other community projects?
- Statement 2: Under the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), is there a mandated portion or percentage of each MP's fund that must be spent for the benefit of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) populations?
- Statement 3: For the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), are funds sanctioned on a yearly basis and are unspent or unused funds prohibited from being carried forward to the next financial year?
- Statement 4: Under the Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), is the district authority required to inspect at least 10% of all works under implementation each year?
- Explicitly links MPLADS funds to purchase of hospital and COVIDโ19 related equipment for government health facilities.
- Shows MPLADS can be deployed for health-sector physical inputs, supporting use for durable health infrastructure or supplies.
- Refers to Local Area Development Fund being used by MPs to take up waterโharvesting schemes, a durable infrastructure project.
- Demonstrates MPs are requested to deploy constituency development funds for physical infrastructure works.
- This is from the MPLADS Guidelines text specifying annual recommended works for SC/ST areas.
- It gives explicit mandated percentages: 15% for Scheduled Caste areas and 7.5% for Scheduled Tribe areas of the annual MPLADS entitlement.
States a clear rule pattern: reservations (and related earmarking) in panchayats are to be 'in proportion to their population' and includes fixed subโearmarking (e.g., oneโthird of reserved seats for women).
A student could apply this proportional/earmarking principle to ask whether MPLADS likewise prescribes spending proportional to SC/ST population in a constituency.
Gives an example where a government scheme explicitly earmarks a percentage (30% of awards for women), showing that social schemes sometimes include mandated percentages.
Use this example to reason that MPLADS, as a government scheme, might similarly include explicit percentage earmarks for beneficiary groups and so check MPLADS rules for such clauses.
Explains the rule for reserving constituencies: SC/ST reservations are tied to areas with higher proportions of these populations and are geographically distributed.
Suggests a pattern where benefits or allocations are linked to local demographic proportions, prompting a check if MPLADS allocations are required to reflect SC/ST population shares in constituencies.
States that MPLADS funds have specified permissible uses and that the scheme's operation can be suspended/modified (example: COVIDโrelated restrictions).
Shows MPLADS is governed by specific rules, so a student should examine MPLADS guidelines to see if they include mandated SC/ST expenditure percentages.
Notes that constitutional/state provisions mandate reservation for SC/ST in local bodies proportional to population, indicating a broader governmental practice of translating demographic proportions into mandated allocations.
A student could generalize this practice to hypothesize MPLADS might require proportional targeting of funds for SC/ST and then verify in MPLADS documentation.
States the general budgetary principle of annuity / 'rule of lapse' โ Parliament grants money for one financial year and unspent balances expire to the Consolidated Fund.
A student could apply this general rule to MPLADS to suspect that MPLADS allocations, being government grants, may also be annual and subject to lapse unless specific provisions exist.
Repeats the same annuity / rule of lapse principle, reinforcing that parliamentary grants are normally single-year authorisations.
Combine this repeated rule with knowledge that MPLADS is a parliamentary-authorised scheme to infer MPLADS funds are likely yearly unless an exception is specified.
Explains the role of the Consolidated Fund and Public Account โ unspent public money normally relates back to these government accounts.
A student could trace where unspent MPLADS money would legally revert (e.g., Consolidated Fund) under the lapse principle to test if carryโforward is allowed.
Describes recoupment from the Consolidency/Contingency Fund and parliamentary approval processes for extraordinary expenditures.
Use this example of how temporary expenditures are regularised after Parliament meets to assess whether temporary MPLADS expenditures might be treated differently from annual grants.
Describes 'token grant' and reappropriation mechanisms โ showing that funds can be moved between heads but new expenditure needs parliamentary sanction.
A student could use this pattern to ask whether unused MPLADS funds could be reappropriated or would instead lapse without fresh parliamentary approval.
- This is from the official MPLADS Guidelines document (district authority section).
- Clause 4.5.2 explicitly mandates the district authority to inspect at least 10% of works under implementation every year and involve the MP in such inspections.
States that the district is the proper unit for planning and that district-level bodies should have roles in planning, implementation and monitoring of development programmes.
A student could infer that MPLADS works, being development programmes, are likely subject to district-level monitoring and thus check official MPLADS guidelines for an inspection quota or percentage.
Reiterates that Panchayat Raj institutions at district and lower levels are assigned roles in implementation and monitoring of rural development programmes.
One could reasonably look for scheme-specific monitoring rules (e.g., inspection frequency/percentage) in central MPLADS procedure documents given this delegated monitoring role.
Explains that every state shall constitute a District Planning Committee to consolidate and prepare district development plans, highlighting formal district-level planning structures.
Using this, a student might deduce that formal district committees would implement or record any mandated inspection norms (like a 10% requirement) if such a rule exists for centrally sponsored schemes.
Describes block and district level planning and supervision through block samitis and block development officers, indicating multi-tier oversight in implementation of projects.
A student could use this to argue that inspection responsibilities could be distributed across tiers and therefore look for a specified percentage (e.g., 10%) in MPLADS operational guidelines or administrative orders.
Mentions specific administrative decisions about MPLADS (allowed expenditures and temporary suspension), showing the scheme is governed by central rules and can be regulated.
From this, a student might infer MPLADS has formal operational rules (including possible monitoring/inspection requirements) and should consult MPLADS manuals or ministry orders to verify a 10% inspection rule.
- [THE VERDICT]: Moderate/Trap. Statement 3 is the classic 'Non-Lapsable' exception taught in Polity. S2 and S4 are 'Guideline Minutiae' found in the official Ministry PDF.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Parliament > Financial Control > Discretionary Grants (MPLADS).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. MPLADS funds are Non-Lapsable (carry forward allowed). 2. Lok Sabha MPs: Constituency only. 3. Rajya Sabha MPs: Anywhere in the State. 4. Nominated MPs: Anywhere in India. 5. SC/ST Quota: 15% and 7.5% mandatory. 6. Role: MPs 'Recommend', District Authority 'Sanctions' and 'Inspects'.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying flagship schemes involving money (MPLADS, MGNREGA), always check the 'Financial Lifecycle': Is it demand-driven? Is it lapsable? Who is the actual implementing authority (usually the DC/DM, not the MP)?
MPLADS and related local development funds are used by MPs to create constituency-level infrastructure projects such as waterโharvesting works.
High-yield for questions on central schemes and MPs' discretionary funds; links to topics on decentralised development and scheme financing. Mastering this helps answer queries on permissible uses, infrastructure creation, and constituency development priorities.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 3: The Drainage System of India > Government Strategy > p. 36
MPLADS funds can be allocated to purchase hospital equipment and COVIDโ19 related supplies for government health facilities.
Important for questions on scheme flexibility and emergency reallocation of funds; connects to public health financing, scheme suspension/repurposing, and governance of discretionary funds.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > BY MINISTRY OF STATISTICS & PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION > p. 617
Reservation of seats in panchayats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes is allotted in proportion to their population.
High-yield for UPSC questions on local governance and affirmative action; links constitutional provisions (Article 243D) to practical allocation of representation and aids analysis of policy equity and resource targeting. Useful for questions on decentralisation, reservation policy and comparative state-level implementations.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 18: PANCHAYATS > Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. > p. 319
Constituencies with higher proportions of SC or ST population are selected for reservation and such reserved constituencies may be rotated during delimitation.
Important for exam questions on electoral law, delimitation and representation; helps explain how demographic distribution drives political reservation and supports arguments about fairness, rotation and regional balance in assembly and parliamentary seats.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Chapter 3: Election and Representation > p. 65
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes comprise substantial shares of the population (SC ~16.6%, ST ~8.6% in 2011 data).
Useful for framing policy questions, estimating proportional reservations/allocations and analysing social justice measures; connects census demographics to reservation policy, welfare schemes and electoral representation debates.
- Democratic Politics-II. Political Science-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: Gender, Religion and Caste > Social and Religious Diversity of India > p. 39
Parliamentary grants are made for one financial year and unspent balances expire, which is directly relevant to whether allocations (like MPLADS) can be carried forward.
High-yield for questions on financial powers of Parliament and budgetary control; links to Consolidated Fund mechanics and helps answer whether yearly grants can create multi-year reserves. Mastery enables reasoning about carry-forward, supplementary grants and fiscal limits.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > III Financial Powers and Functions > p. 258
MPLADS specifies permitted uses and has been subject to operational decisions (for example temporary suspension and repurposing), which affects how its allocations are treated in practice.
Important for polity and governance questions on constituency-level funds and scheme administration; connects to public expenditure prioritisation and emergency reallocation of funds (useful for case-based prelims/mains questions).
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > BY MINISTRY OF STATISTICS & PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION > p. 617
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 3: The Drainage System of India > Government Strategy > p. 36
Convergence Rules: MPLADS funds can be converged with MGNREGA or Khelo India to create durable assets, but funds cannot be used for 'acquisition of land', 'religious structures', or 'recurring expenses' (salaries/inventory).
The 'Construction Logic' Hack: Statement 1 says funds are for 'durable assets' (buildings, roads). Construction in India often takes multiple years. If Statement 3 were true (funds lapse yearly), no large durable asset could ever be completed. Therefore, for an infrastructure scheme to work, funds *must* be non-lapsable. S1 and S3 are logically incompatible. Eliminate S3.
Mains GS-2 (Separation of Powers): The Supreme Court (2010 Bhim Singh judgment) upheld MPLADS, ruling it does not violate Separation of Powers because MPs only 'recommend' works, while the Executive (District Authority) retains the power to 'sanction' and 'implement'.