Question map
Consider the following statements: The effect of devaluation of a currency is that it necessarily 1. improves the competitiveness of the domestic exports in the foreign markets 2. increases the foreign value of domestic currency 3. improves the trade balance Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 only).
Devaluation involves a deliberate downward adjustment of a country's currency value relative to foreign currencies. This makes domestic goods cheaper for foreign buyers, thereby necessarily improving the competitiveness of domestic exports in international markets (Statement 1).
- Statement 2 is incorrect because devaluation, by definition, decreases the foreign value of the domestic currency, making it weaker against others.
- Statement 3 is not necessarily correct. While devaluation aims to improve the trade balance, its success depends on the Marshall-Lerner condition (the price elasticity of demand for exports and imports). If the demand is inelastic, or if the cost of essential imported raw materials rises significantly, the trade balance may actually worsen, as seen in the "J-curve" effect.
Since statement 1 is the only outcome that occurs by default through the mechanism of price reduction, 1 only is the most accurate choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Mechanism vs. Outcome' trap. UPSC tests if you distinguish between the immediate price effect (competitiveness) and the conditional final result (trade balance). The word 'necessarily' is the key filter—it validates the definition (S1) but invalidates the conditional outcome (S3).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily improve the competitiveness of that country's domestic exports in foreign markets?
- Statement 2: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily increase the value of the domestic currency in terms of foreign currencies?
- Statement 3: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily improve that country's trade balance?
- Explicitly qualifies devaluation with '(not always)', denying automatic effectiveness.
- Presents devaluation as one measure among others to address BOP, implying conditional outcomes.
- Links devaluation to export stimulation but frames it as a conditional, not guaranteed, tool.
- Identifies the real exchange rate as the determinant of exports and competitiveness.
- Shows exports depend on foreign income and the real exchange rate, so nominal devaluation helps only if the real rate (and external demand) changes accordingly.
- Provides a concrete conditional example: domestic inflation can make exports uncompetitive and devaluation can restore competitiveness only in that situation.
- Implicates that effectiveness of devaluation depends on underlying price levels and relative prices, not on devaluation alone.
- Defines devaluation explicitly as a deliberate reduction in a country's currency value — directly contradicts the claim that devaluation would increase domestic currency value.
- States the purpose of devaluation (make exports cheaper, imports more expensive), which implies a lower domestic-currency value versus foreign currencies.
- Explains that when currency devaluation occurs, the domestic-currency burden of foreign-denominated debt increases — showing the domestic currency has lost value relative to foreign currencies.
- Uses devaluation to illustrate an increase in domestic-currency amounts needed for foreign obligations, which is inconsistent with an increase in domestic currency value.
Gives the technical definition of devaluation in a fixed exchange rate system as a government action that increases the exchange rate (making domestic currency cheaper).
A student can use this to infer that devaluation is an official lowering of domestic-currency value under a peg, and therefore would not 'increase' domestic value — check whether the statement confuses direction.
Distinguishes devaluation (deliberate reduction by government) from depreciation (market-driven fall) and defines devaluation as reducing the value of domestic currency.
Combine with the statement to test if 'devaluation' could ever mean an increase in domestic-currency value — a student would conclude the usual meaning is the opposite and seek exceptions (different regimes).
Explains appreciation and depreciation terminology in terms of domestic currency price in foreign currency under flexible rates.
Use this rule to translate between language (increase/decrease in 'price' of domestic vs foreign currency) and check whether the statement mixes up appreciation/devaluation concepts.
Provides an example-driven pattern: devaluation is used to raise export competitiveness and increase foreign exchange inflow (implying devaluation lowers domestic value to boost exports).
A student could map the intended effect (higher exports) to exchange-rate direction and thus judge that devaluation typically lowers domestic-currency value rather than increases it.
Provides formal definitions linking depreciation/devaluation to decreases in domestic-currency price under different regimes, clarifying terminology.
A student could use these definitions plus knowledge of exchange-rate regimes to assess whether the statement's claim is consistent with textbook definitions.
- Explicitly describes the J‑Curve: trade deficit can initially worsen after depreciation and only improve later under certain assumptions.
- Makes clear that improvement is conditional and not automatic immediately after devaluation.
- Explains that changes in income (domestic and foreign) alter import and export volumes and therefore affect exchange-rate outcomes.
- Shows that trade outcomes after a currency change depend on relative demand dynamics, so devaluation's effect is not mechanically fixed.
- Emphasises that total payments (including invisibles) matter more than visible trade alone when assessing balance adjustments.
- Implies that devaluation is one tool among many to 'alter relative value' and does not guarantee overall trade balance improvement.
- [THE VERDICT]: Conceptual Trap (Medium). Solvable via NCERT Macroeconomics (Chapter 6), but requires handling the extreme keyword 'necessarily' with nuance.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: External Sector > Exchange Rate Systems > Impact of Currency Fluctuations on BOP.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Marshall-Lerner Condition (elasticities sum > 1), J-Curve Effect (short-term worsening vs long-term gain), NEER vs REER (inflation adjustment), Sterilization (RBI open market operations), and the 'Impossible Trinity'.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying economic tools (Repo, Devaluation, MSP), separate the 'First Order Effect' (Price changes) from the 'Second Order Effect' (Volume/Behavior changes). First order is usually 'necessary'; second order is conditional.
The real exchange rate determines how price-competitive domestic goods are abroad, so a nominal devaluation improves competitiveness only if it alters the real exchange rate in favor of exporters.
High-yield for UPSC because it links exchange-rate policy to trade outcomes and balance-of-payments analysis; connects macro topics (inflation, external demand, trade balance). Mastery enables crisp answers on when currency moves affect exports and on policy efficacy questions.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > National Income Identity for an Open Economy > p. 97
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Supply of Foreign Exchange > p. 91
Domestic inflation can offset the intended price effects of a nominal devaluation, so competitiveness improves only when devaluation outpaces domestic price rises.
Important for explaining conditional policy outcomes (why devaluation failed or succeeded historically); links to topics such as price level, competitiveness, and policy sequencing. Useful for questions on balance-of-payments crisis management and effectiveness of devaluation.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 2: Money and Banking- Part I > Before 1993: > p. 40
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 16: Balance of Payments > Measures taken by the Government/RBI to overcome BOP Imbalance > p. 484
Devaluation is an official policy move under fixed regimes, whereas depreciation is market-driven under flexible regimes; the institutional context shapes how and when competitiveness is affected.
Essential for answering questions on policy tools and constraints under different regimes, and for evaluating government measures (e.g., revaluation, black markets). Helps frame policy prescriptions and historical examples in essays and mains answers.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Fixed Exchange Rates > p. 94
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > Types of Exchange Rate System > p. 492
Devaluation is an official reduction in the domestic currency's price under a pegged system, while depreciation and appreciation describe market-driven falls or rises in value.
High-yield: distinguishing these terms is essential for answering questions on exchange-rate policy and interpreting policy actions. It links to macroeconomic policy, balance-of-payments analysis, and forex market mechanics. Mastery allows rapid elimination of wording traps in UPSC questions about currency value changes and policy responses.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > WHICH EXCHANGE RATE SYSTEM SUITS AN ECONOMY BEST? > p. 494
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > National Income Identity for an Open Economy > p. 101
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Flexible Exchange Rate > p. 92
Devaluation is a deliberate government action in a fixed/pegged regime; depreciation/appreciation occur automatically under flexible regimes.
High-yield: many questions ask how policy tools and outcomes differ across regimes. Understanding regime type clarifies what actions (devaluation, revaluation) are possible and their institutional mechanics. This concept bridges international macroeconomics, monetary policy, and external sector issues.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Fixed Exchange Rates > p. 94
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > WHICH EXCHANGE RATE SYSTEM SUITS AN ECONOMY BEST? > p. 494
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > Types of Exchange Rate System > p. 492
Changes in currency value (including devaluation) influence export competitiveness, foreign exchange flows, and import costs.
High-yield: UPSC often tests links between exchange rates and trade balance, BOP adjustment, and growth policy. Mastery helps answer applied questions on how exchange-rate moves alter exports, imports, and foreign-investment incentives.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES OFTEN DEVALUE THEIR CURRENCY, IS IT TRUE? > p. 495
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Supply of Foreign Exchange > p. 91
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Open Economy Macroeconomics > Income and the Exchange Rate > p. 93
A currency depreciation can worsen the trade deficit initially and only improve later, so improvement is not automatic.
High-yield for answers on exchange rate policy and short vs long run effects; links macro policy to trade and balance of payments questions. Enables explanation of temporal dynamics in policy debates (short‑term pain vs long‑term gain).
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 16: Balance of Payments > IRVE > p. 486
The Marshall-Lerner Condition. Since they asked *if* devaluation improves trade balance (and the answer was 'not necessarily'), the next logical question is *under what condition* does it improve? Answer: When the sum of price elasticities of demand for exports and imports is greater than 1.
The 'Definition Check' Hack. Look at Statement 2: 'Increases the foreign value of domestic currency.' Devaluation literally means *decreasing* the value. This is a definitional contradiction. Eliminate Statement 2 immediately. You are left with A (1 only) and C (3 only). Between Competitiveness (Price) and Trade Balance (Volume), Price is the direct mathematical result of devaluation, while Balance depends on global demand. Choose the direct effect (Statement 1).
Mains GS3 (Energy Security & CAD): Devaluation acts as a double-edged sword for India. While it boosts software/textile exports (competitiveness), it inflates the Oil Import Bill, potentially worsening the Current Account Deficit (CAD) and importing inflation (Pass-through effect).