Question map
Consider the following statements: The effect of devaluation of a currency is that it necessarily 1. improves the competitiveness of the domestic exports in the foreign markets 2. increases the foreign value of domestic currency 3. improves the trade balance Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 only).
Devaluation involves a deliberate downward adjustment of a country's currency value relative to foreign currencies. This makes domestic goods cheaper for foreign buyers, thereby necessarily improving the competitiveness of domestic exports in international markets (Statement 1).
- Statement 2 is incorrect because devaluation, by definition, decreases the foreign value of the domestic currency, making it weaker against others.
- Statement 3 is not necessarily correct. While devaluation aims to improve the trade balance, its success depends on the Marshall-Lerner condition (the price elasticity of demand for exports and imports). If the demand is inelastic, or if the cost of essential imported raw materials rises significantly, the trade balance may actually worsen, as seen in the "J-curve" effect.
Since statement 1 is the only outcome that occurs by default through the mechanism of price reduction, 1 only is the most accurate choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Mechanism vs. Outcome' trap. UPSC tests if you distinguish between the immediate price effect (competitiveness) and the conditional final result (trade balance). The word 'necessarily' is the key filter—it validates the definition (S1) but invalidates the conditional outcome (S3).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily improve the competitiveness of that country's domestic exports in foreign markets?
- Statement 2: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily increase the value of the domestic currency in terms of foreign currencies?
- Statement 3: Does devaluation of a country's currency necessarily improve that country's trade balance?
- Explicitly qualifies devaluation with '(not always)', denying automatic effectiveness.
- Presents devaluation as one measure among others to address BOP, implying conditional outcomes.
- Links devaluation to export stimulation but frames it as a conditional, not guaranteed, tool.
- Identifies the real exchange rate as the determinant of exports and competitiveness.
- Shows exports depend on foreign income and the real exchange rate, so nominal devaluation helps only if the real rate (and external demand) changes accordingly.
- Provides a concrete conditional example: domestic inflation can make exports uncompetitive and devaluation can restore competitiveness only in that situation.
- Implicates that effectiveness of devaluation depends on underlying price levels and relative prices, not on devaluation alone.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.