Question map
Consider the following statements: 1. Tight monetary policy of US Federal Reserve could lead to capital flight. 2. Capital flight may increase the interest cost of firms with existing External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs). 3. Devaluation of domestic currency decreases the currency risk associated with ECBs. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 and 2 only). The explanation for the statements is as follows:
- Statement 1 is correct: A tight monetary policy (increasing interest rates) by the US Federal Reserve makes dollar-denominated assets more attractive. This leads to capital flight from emerging markets like India as investors seek higher, safer returns in the US.
- Statement 2 is correct: Capital flight leads to a depreciation of the domestic currency (Rupee). For firms with External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs), a weaker Rupee means they must spend more domestic currency to buy the same amount of dollars to service their debt, effectively increasing their interest and repayment costs.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: Devaluation or depreciation of the domestic currency increases the currency risk associated with ECBs. It makes the repayment of foreign-denominated debt more expensive, potentially leading to a "currency mismatch" on the firm's balance sheet.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 represent accurate economic consequences.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Mechanism' question rather than a 'Definition' question. It tests if you can simulate a chain reaction: US Policy → Capital Flows → Exchange Rate → Corporate Balance Sheet. Statements 1 and 2 are standard textbook logic, while Statement 3 is a logic trap that requires understanding that a weaker currency hurts, not helps, foreign borrowers.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can a tight monetary policy by the US Federal Reserve cause capital flight from emerging markets?
- Statement 2: Can capital flight increase the interest costs for firms that have existing External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs)?
- Statement 3: Does a devaluation of the domestic currency decrease the currency risk associated with External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs) denominated in foreign currency?
- Explains that monetary policy changes are transmitted through money markets into bond and bank loan markets.
- States financial markets play a critical role in transmitting monetary policy impulses to the rest of the economy.
- Transmission across markets provides a channel by which an external tightening can affect other economies' financial conditions.
- States that flexible/free float exchange regimes carry the risk of sudden capital flight and speculative attacks.
- Links exchange rate regime vulnerability to rapid cross-border capital movements that can harm an economy.
- Describes that changes in forex reserves and the financial account (FDI, FPI, reserves) reflect capital flow transactions.
- Connects capital/financial account movements and reserve changes as measurable outcomes of cross-border capital flows.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.