Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. 'Right to the City' is an agreed human right and the UN-Habitat monitors the commitments made by each country in this regard. 2. Right to the City' gives every occupant of the city the right to reclaim public spaces and public participation in the city. 3. 'Right to the City' means that the State cannot deny any public service or facility to the unauthorized colonies in the city. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (2 and 3). The concept of the "Right to the City" is a collective right emphasizing democratic control over urban spaces and social justice.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: While the "Right to the City" is a recognized advocacy framework and part of the New Urban Agenda (Habitat III), it is not a legally binding "agreed human right" under international law, nor does UN-Habitat have a formal mandate to monitor specific national commitments in a regulatory sense.
- Statement 2 is correct: It aligns with the core philosophy of Henri Lefebvre, suggesting that inhabitants should have the power to reshape the city, reclaim public spaces, and participate in urban decision-making processes.
- Statement 3 is correct: From a rights-based perspective, the "Right to the City" implies that all residents, including those in unauthorized colonies or informal settlements, are entitled to basic public services and dignity, preventing the State from exclusionary practices based on legal tenure status.
Therefore, statements 2 and 3 accurately reflect the socio-legal dimensions of the concept, making Option 4 correct.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a 'Soft Law' trap. UPSC tests if you can distinguish between a binding International Treaty (Hard Law) and a progressive policy framework (Soft Law). The 'Right to the City' is a conceptual paradigm (New Urban Agenda), not a codified treaty with a monitoring body. Always verify the 'legal status' of buzzwords.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is "Right to the City" recognized as an international or agreed human right under international law or UN instruments?
- Statement 2: Does UN-Habitat formally monitor commitments made by individual countries specifically regarding the "Right to the City"?
- Statement 3: Does the "Right to the City" concept grant every occupant of a city the right to reclaim public spaces?
- Statement 4: Does the "Right to the City" concept grant every occupant of a city the right to public participation in urban decision-making?
- Statement 5: Does the "Right to the City" imply that the State cannot deny public services or facilities to unauthorized colonies within a city?
- Explicitly distinguishes 'right to the city' from enumerated human rights: it "does not grant specific rights".
- Frames the concept as a paradigm that enables inhabitants rather than as a codified, specific international right.
- Notes that international human rights instruments are the starting point for states and that elaboration of rights has been argued for by the international community.
- Implies the 'right to the city' is a subject of discussion and potential elaboration rather than already an agreed international legal right.
- Shows UN agencies (UNESCO and UN-HABITAT) have launched a joint project on the 'Right to the City', indicating UN engagement with the concept.
- Engagement by UN bodies does not by itself equate to formal recognition as an agreed international human right.
States that new rights evolve over time and some international covenants have contributed to expansion of rights, indicating that recognition of novel rights is a process.
A student could use this rule to check major international covenants (e.g., UDHR, ICESCR) and later UN declarations to see whether "Right to the City" has been incorporated as a recognized right.
The UDHR is presented as a universal standard proclaimed by the UN, showing that UN proclamations can establish common standards of human rights.
Use this pattern to examine whether the UN General Assembly or similar UN instruments have proclaimed or defined a "Right to the City" as a common standard.
Notes that international covenants may recognise rights not in domestic constitutions and that some instruments are seen as standards even before becoming treaties.
A student could check whether any UN texts or covenants mention the concept even if it hasnât been formalized into a binding treaty.
Explains that legal recognition depends on government support and law, highlighting the difference between moral claims and legally enforceable international rights.
Apply this distinction to see if "Right to the City" exists as a moral/advocacy claim versus being legally binding under international law.
Describes the role of international NGOs in advocacy and in building coalitions that can push for recognition of rights at the international level.
Investigate whether NGOs or coalitions have campaigned for "Right to the City" in UN fora or influenced any UN instruments or soft-law documents.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.