Question map
In India, what is the role of the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO)? 1. CCO is the major source of Coal Statistics in Government of India. 2. It monitors progress of development of Captive Coal/Lignite blocks. 3. It hears any objection to the Government’s notification relating to acquisition of coal-bearing areas. 4. It ensures that coal mining companies deliver the coal to end users in the prescribed time. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1, 2, and 3). The Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) performs several statutory and administrative functions under the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) and the Ministry of Coal.
- Statement 1 is correct: The CCO is the primary agency responsible for the collection and publication of coal statistics in India. It publishes the Annual Coal Directory and the Provisional Coal Statistics.
- Statement 2 is correct: The CCO monitors the progress of the development of captive coal and lignite mines and ensures compliance with the terms and conditions of allotment.
- Statement 3 is correct: Under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, the Coal Controller is the competent authority to hear and adjudicate objections regarding the government's intention to acquire coal-bearing land.
- Statement 4 is incorrect: The CCO does not have a mandate to ensure the timely delivery of coal to end-users. Distribution and supply timelines are commercial matters governed by Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) between mining companies and consumers.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question is a classic 'Institutional Role' bouncer. While Statement 1 is hidden in the footnotes of Majid Husain (Source: CCO), Statements 2 and 3 demand a look at the Ministry of Coal's 'Functions' page. It tests if you know the difference between a Regulator/Statistician (CCO) and a Commercial Operator (Coal India/Railways).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) in India the primary/major source of official coal statistics for the Government of India?
- Statement 2: Does the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) in India monitor the progress of development of captive coal and lignite blocks?
- Statement 3: Does the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) in India hear objections to Government notifications related to acquisition of coal-bearing areas?
- Statement 4: Does the Coal Controller’s Organization (CCO) in India ensure that coal mining companies deliver coal to end users within prescribed timeframes?
- Identifies Provisional Coal Statistics as published by the Coal Controller (Govt. of India, Ministry of Coal).
- Uses CCO data to report state-level production figures (Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh).
- Table of historical coal production explicitly attributes the data to Provisional Coal Statistics from the Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata.
- Shows CCO figures are used for national production time-series, implying central statistical role.
- State reserve and production descriptions are drawn from Provisional Coal Statistics by the Coal Controller's Organization.
- Demonstrates CCO data underpins descriptive accounts of major coal-bearing states.
- Explicitly lists monitoring the progress of development of captive coal/lignite blocks as a function of the CCO.
- Direct statement from the Ministry of Coal annual report showing this is an official duty.
- Describes operational activity: CCO collects progress data on captive coal/lignite blocks and consolidates reports.
- Shows CCO furnishes consolidated quarterly reports to the Ministry of Coal for review, evidencing active monitoring.
- Confirms the Office of the Coal Controller collects status/progress of allocated coal blocks and associated end-use projects.
- Reinforces that monitoring progress of coal blocks is a CCO activity.
Cites the Coal Controller as the source of provisional coal and lignite production statistics, implying the CCO collects and publishes production data.
A student could infer that an agency that compiles production statistics likely tracks outputs from different types of blocks (including captive/lignite) and then check CCO publications for block-level progress data.
Specifies 'Provisional Coal Statistics 2016–17, Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata' as a data source, showing CCO provides detailed coalfield/region information.
One could extend this by looking up such CCO reports to see whether they include development or production status of individual captive blocks.
Explains the captive mining regime and notes that allocations were made without bidding and without described mechanisms, suggesting regulatory or monitoring needs for captive blocks.
Given the special allocation regime, a student might reason that a central statistical/regulatory body (like CCO) would be a plausible place to monitor progress and compliance, and hence examine CCO functions or circulars for oversight roles.
Mentions the 'Coal Mitra Web Portal' launched to manage coal utilisation and transfers, indicating the sector uses centralized information systems for monitoring and management.
By analogy, a student could check whether the CCO feeds data to or uses such portals to monitor development of blocks, especially captive/lignite ones.
Notes policy shifts allowing different bidding/usage regimes for coal blocks, implying evolving oversight requirements over block allocation and development.
A student might deduce that policy changes increase the need for monitoring by agencies like the CCO and therefore review CCO responsibilities in the context of these reforms.
- Explicitly states CCO handles 'Disposal of cases under Section 8' of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development) Act, and submits reports in respect of notifications.
- Linking disposal of Section 8 cases to 'notifications' indicates CCO deals with matters arising from government notifications under the Act (e.g., objections/cases).
- Identifies administration of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 as within the Ministry/CCO's remit.
- Supports that CCO has statutory functions related to the Act under which notifications and related objections would be handled.
States that 'Regulation of mines and mineral development' is on the Union List and that the Centre frames rules/regulations for minerals like coal, implying central bodies may have regulatory/administrative roles over coal.
A student could use this to check central statutes/notifications (e.g., the Coal Bearing Areas Act/regulations) to see whether functions like hearing objections are assigned to a central office such as the CCO.
Mentions the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 and that its validity was litigated, showing there is specific central legislation governing acquisition of coal-bearing areas.
Knowing a central Act exists, a student could examine that Act’s text or rules to locate who is empowered to issue notifications and who is authorised to receive/hear objections.
Repeats that the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 is central legislation challenged in court, reinforcing that acquisition is governed by statutory procedure at the Union level.
Use the Act as a starting point to trace delegated powers to administrative bodies (e.g., whether the Coal Controller’s Organization is named for procedural tasks like hearing objections).
Identifies the Coal Controller's Organization (Kolkata) as the source of official provisional coal statistics, showing the CCO is an official central agency involved in coal administration/data.
From the CCO’s role as an official agency, a student might infer it could have broader administrative functions and therefore check its mandate or rules to confirm if objections/hearings are within its remit.
Lists the CCO as the source for provisional coal statistics and locates major coal reserves, again demonstrating the CCO’s formal presence in central coal administration.
A student could combine this institutional evidence with the Act (from snippets above) to inspect whether statutory procedures for acquisition delegate objection-hearing powers to the CCO.
Explicitly cites 'Provisional Coal Statistics 2016–17, Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata' — showing CCO acts as a statistical/recording agency for coal data.
A student could infer that because CCO collects and publishes detailed coal statistics, it likely has data that could be used to monitor supply/delivery performance and then check CCO's stated functions or reports for any timing/dispatch-monitoring role.
Again identifies the CCO as the source for national coal reserve/production information, implying a central data/monitoring function.
Combine this with knowledge that monitoring agencies that publish production/dispatch statistics often also publish performance indicators or directives — so one could look for CCO publications/regulations on delivery timeliness.
Lists 'Less Efficient Transport System' and shortage of wagons as a major problem causing delays in delivering coal to distant places.
Using this, a student could reason that even if a regulator/agency (like CCO) issues timeframes, practical delivery depends on transport constraints — so check whether CCO's remit includes enforcement or only data/standards while rail logistics are a separate constraint.
Mentions the 'Coal Mitra Web Portal' launched to bring flexibility in utilisation by transferring coal from high-cost to cost-efficient stations — indicating government/administrative mechanisms exist to manage coal allocation/logistics.
A student could extend this by investigating whether the CCO is involved with such portals/allocations or whether those are managed by other departments (suggesting CCO may not directly enforce delivery timeframes).
Describes governmental initiatives aimed at ensuring adequate coal for electricity and bringing transparency to the mining sector, implying oversight and optimization efforts.
One could use this to hypothesize that agencies (potentially including CCO) may have roles in transparency/monitoring; follow-up would be to check specific mandates to see if timely delivery enforcement is included.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap-laden Moderate. Statement 1 is in Majid Husain (footnotes of Coal chapter), but Stmt 4 is the logic key to eliminate.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Mineral Regulation & Institutional Framework. Not just 'where is coal found,' but 'who governs it?'
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. CCO vs CIL (Regulator vs Miner). 2. Coal Bearing Areas Act 1957 (Land acquisition specific to coal). 3. SHAKTI Policy (Coal allocation). 4. UTTAM App (Coal quality monitoring). 5. Star Rating of Mines (Sustainable Development Cell).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When a standard book table cites a data source (e.g., 'Source: Coal Controller'), pause. Google that organization. Read its 'About Us' or 'Charter'. UPSC loves asking about the *source* of the data you memorize.
Provisional Coal Statistics published by the Coal Controller's Organization provide national coal production and reserve figures used in official-level reporting.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often ask which institutions publish official sectoral statistics and how government ministries compile data; mastering this links institutional knowledge (Ministry of Coal, CCO) to data reliability and policy discussion. Knowing this enables quick answers on official data sources and their uses in planning and textbooks.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 1
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Table 8.2 > p. 7
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Source: Provisional Coal Statistics 2016–17, Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata. > p. 3
Coal reserves and production are concentrated in a few states (Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh), shaping regional resource profiles.
Essential for geography and economy questions that probe resource distribution, regional development, and industrial location; it helps link raw data to topics like energy security, interstate infrastructure, and environmental impacts. Enables comparative and map-based questions on mineral endowments.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 1
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Source: Provisional Coal Statistics 2016–17, Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata. > p. 3
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 0
Coal constitutes the major share of India's commercial energy and is tracked via annual production series (annual totals and trends are published).
Crucial for essays and prelims/GS papers on energy policy, climate trade-offs, and import dependence; understanding coal's quantitative dominance and trend data supports argumentation on transition strategies, power sector planning, and economic impacts. Useful for data-based MCQs and policy-analysis answers.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 0
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Table 8.2 > p. 7
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Mineral and Energy Resources > Coal > p. 59
CCO functions as the national agency that compiles provisional coal and lignite production statistics.
High-yield for UPSC: recognizing institutional data sources helps in answering questions on sectoral statistics, policy assessment and data reliability. It connects to questions on governance, departmental roles and interpretation of production trends.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 1
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Source: Provisional Coal Statistics 2016–17, Coal Controller's Organization, Kolkata. > p. 6
Captive coal blocks are allocated for specific end-use projects and traditionally could not be sold in the open market.
High-yield for UPSC: understanding captive mining rules is essential for questions on mineral policy reforms, allocation mechanisms and private participation in mining; links to reforms in auctioning and revenue-sharing models.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 14: Infrastructure and Investment Models > Background: > p. 427
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Part IV: New Horizons of Growth > p. 621
Coal and lignite production is regionally concentrated, with major states and corporations accounting for large shares of output.
High-yield for UPSC: resource distribution questions frequently test knowledge of major producing states and companies; this links physical geography with economic and industrial geography topics such as energy security and regional development.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 1
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Coal > p. 0
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Mineral and Energy Resources > Coal > p. 59
The Act was subject to a constitutional challenge by a State and the Supreme Court dismissed that suit, making the Act's validity a settled legal point in that dispute.
High-yield for UPSC because it ties statutory mineral acquisition law to centre–state disputes and Supreme Court original jurisdiction; useful for questions on federal disputes over resource control, constitutional validity of resource laws, and landmark litigation examples.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 347
The Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act, 2015. Since CCO monitors captive blocks (Stmt 2), the next logical question is on the 'Mine Closure Plan'—which is technically approved by the Coal Controller. Also, look out for the 'Coal Mines Surveillance & Management System (CMSMS)' and 'Khan Prahari' app for reporting illegal mining.
The 'Impossible Bureaucrat' Heuristic. Look at Statement 4: 'Ensures... deliver... in prescribed time.' A government office in Kolkata cannot physically ensure that a mining company in Jharkhand delivers coal to a power plant in Gujarat on time. That involves Railways, weather, and commercial contracts. Bureaucracies *monitor* (Stmt 2) and *adjudicate* (Stmt 3); they do not execute commercial logistics. Eliminate 4.
GS3 - Energy Security & Federalism. The CCO hearing objections on land acquisition (Stmt 3) touches on the tension between Central resource control (Union List) and State land rights. This is a perfect example of 'Cooperative Federalism' friction points in mineral governance.