Question map
With reference to the proposals of Cripps Mission, consider the following statements: 1. The Constituent Assembly would have members nominated by the Provincial Assemblies as well as the Princely States. 2. Any Province, which is not prepared to accept the new Constitution would have the right to sign a separate agreement with Britain regarding its future status. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2. The Cripps Mission (1942) introduced several provisions that were ultimately rejected by Indian leaders but are crucial for historical analysis.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: The Mission proposed a Constituent Assembly where members from Provincial Assemblies would be elected (through proportional representation), while members from the Princely States would be nominated by their rulers. The statement wrongly suggests nomination for both.
- Statement 2 is correct: A novel and controversial feature of the proposals was the "non-accession clause." It stated that any province unwilling to accept the new Constitution could retain its existing constitutional position and had the right to negotiate a separate agreement with the British government, effectively granting them the same status as the Indian Union.
This provision was a major reason for the Congress's rejection, as it was perceived as a blueprint for the partition of India and the creation of "Pakistan" through the back door.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Accuracy Check' question from standard sources (Spectrum/Laxmikanth). The trap lies in a single word—'nominated' vs 'elected'. If you read history like a novel, you missed it; if you read it like a lawyer, you scored.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: According to the Cripps Mission proposals (1942), did the Constituent Assembly include members nominated by the Provincial Assemblies and by the Princely States?
- Statement 2: According to the Cripps Mission proposals (1942), did any province that refused to accept the proposed new constitution have the right to sign a separate agreement with Britain concerning its future status?
- Explicitly states the assembly would be partly elected by provincial assemblies and partly nominated by princes.
- Presented as the mission's main proposal about Constituent Assembly composition.
- Specifies representatives of princely states were to be nominated by the heads of those states.
- Specifies members were to be indirectly elected by provincial assemblies (proportional representation).
- Gives numeric allocation showing provincial assemblies and princely states as distinct sources of members (provincial 292; princely 93).
- Demonstrates both provincial assemblies and princely states supplied members to the Constituent Assembly.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.