Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement-I : Carbon markets are likely to be one of the most widespread tools in the fight against climate change. Statement-II : Carbon markets transfer resources from the private sector to the State. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2.
Statement-I is correct: Carbon markets (compliance and voluntary) are increasingly adopted globally as a key policy tool to mitigate climate change. By putting a price on carbon emissions, they incentivize industries to adopt cleaner technologies, making them a widespread mechanism for global decarbonization.
Statement-II is correct: In many regulatory frameworks, such as "Cap-and-Trade" systems, the State auctions emission permits to companies. This process effectively transfers financial resources from the private sector to the State, which can then be reinvested in green infrastructure or climate adaptation.
Why Statement-II is not the correct explanation: While both statements are true, Statement-II describes a fiscal mechanism of the market, whereas Statement-I refers to its efficacy as a mitigation tool. The primary reason carbon markets are "widespread tools" is their ability to reduce emissions cost-effectively through market dynamics, not merely because they generate revenue for the State.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question bridges Environment and Economy. It moves beyond 'What is the Kyoto Protocol?' to 'How does the money flow in a carbon market?'. It rewards candidates who understand the economic mechanics (Cap-and-Trade auctions) rather than just the environmental definitions.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Describes programs created to promote readiness for the anticipated emergence of international carbon markets.
- Notes provision of grants and technical support specifically for implementing market-based mitigation tools.
- Documents substantial global carbon credit trading value and active participation by major economies (India, China, Europe).
- Identifies developing countries as major sellers and advanced regions as buyers, signalling broad international market uptake.
- Explains the Kyoto Protocol's flexible market mechanisms based on emissions-permit trading as a way to meet targets.
- Emphasises market mechanisms as a policy route to encourage cost-effective greenhouse gas abatement.
- Explicitly states carbon credits under the Kyoto system can be sold for money, establishing that carbon permits have monetary value and are traded.
- If permits/credits carry monetary value and are sold, money flows are created that could be directed to purchasers or sellers depending on market design.
- Defines emission permits/allowances as carbon credits and describes assigned allowances, making clear governments or countries can allocate tradable emission rights.
- Allocation of a fixed amount of allowances creates a tradable asset that can be transacted for money.
- Shows that when the government auctions a public right (here, coal mines), proceeds from the auction are disbursed to state governments, demonstrating auctioning as a mechanism to move private payments to the public treasury.
- By analogy, auctioning emission allowances would similarly channel bid payments from private bidders to government accounts.
- Bullet 1. [THE VERDICT]: Conceptual Trap + Shankar IAS (Ch 24) & Nitin Singhania (Ch 21).
- Bullet 2. [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: 'Climate Finance' and 'Market-Based Instruments' under the Mitigation Strategies syllabus.
- Bullet 3. [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Pricing' siblings: Carbon Tax vs. Cap-and-Trade, Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Internal Carbon Pricing, and Article 6 (Paris Agreement) mechanisms (ITMOs).
- Bullet 4. [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Don't just read definitions. Ask the 'Cui Bono' (Who benefits?) question. In a Carbon Tax or Auctioned Permit system, who collects the money? (The State). Who pays? (The Private Sector). This economic logic solves Statement II.
Carbon trading functions as a market mechanism to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by creating tradable credits and permits.
High-yield for UPSC because questions probe policy instruments for climate mitigation and international mechanisms; links to topics on climate finance, international agreements, and domestic policy design. Understanding this enables candidates to evaluate economic incentives vs regulatory approaches in syllabus and essay questions.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Partnership for Market Readiness > p. 345
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 21: Mitigation Strategies > Developing countries > p. 284
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > z. Flexible Market Mechanisms > p. 325
International governance (Article 6) establishes rules and operational details that shape cross-border carbon trading.
Important for Mains and current-affairs answers on Paris Agreement implementation and global climate governance; connects to negotiations, double counting issues, and transfer of credits. Mastery helps answer questions on treaty mechanisms and reform of market instruments.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Partnership for Market Readiness > p. 345
Kyoto-style market mechanisms use permit trading to allow countries to meet targets cost-effectively by buying/selling emissions allowances or credits.
Useful for comparatives between command-and-control vs market-based policies in UPSC; ties into environmental economics, international commitments, and national mitigation strategies. Enables analysis of policy efficiency, equity, and implementation challenges.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > z. Flexible Market Mechanisms > p. 325
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Low-Carbon Economy > p. 604
Emission permits are defined as carbon credits and represent tradable rights to emit which can be bought or sold for money.
High-yield for questions on climate policy and market instruments β knowing that allowances are tradable explains how market transactions create monetary flows. Connects to international agreements (Kyoto) and domestic allowance schemes; useful for essay/GS mains and policy analysis.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Emission tradinsl'cap-and-trade', > p. 326
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Low-Carbon Economy > p. 604
Government auctions of public rights convert private bids into public revenue, with proceeds disbursed to state coffers.
Core fiscal-policy concept relevant to privatisation, resource allocation and revenue mobilisation. Helps answer questions on how market mechanisms can raise public funds (e.g., auctions of spectrum, mines, or potentially emissions allowances).
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 14: Infrastructure and Investment Models > Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Act 2015: > p. 428
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 17: Contemporary Issues > Privatisation > p. 84
Carbon trading under treaties like Kyoto permits selling of carbon credits in a market-oriented system, creating financial transactions around emissions.
Essential for understanding climate governance and economic instruments in environmental policy. Useful across GS papers (economy, environment) and for evaluating policy options (cap-and-trade vs taxes).
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Low-Carbon Economy > p. 604
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Emission tradinsl'cap-and-trade', > p. 326
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Since UPSC asked about domestic carbon markets transferring resources, the next logical step is international trade defenses where carbon costs are equalized at the border (EU's specific tool).
The 'Public Trust' Heuristic. Ask yourself: Who owns the atmosphere? The State (as trustee of the commons). If a private entity wants to use/pollute this public asset, they must pay the owner. Therefore, the flow of resources MUST be Private -> State (via auctions/taxes). This logic validates Statement II immediately.
Fiscal Policy (Economy). View Carbon Markets not just as 'Environment' but as 'Non-Tax Revenue' for the government. Just as spectrum auctions transfer private money to the State, auctioning 'pollution rights' does the same.