Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement I : Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change is frequently discussed in global discussions on sustainable development and climate change. Statement II : Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change sets out the principles of carbon markets. Statement III : Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change intends to promote inter-country non-market strategies to reach their climate targets. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation
Article 6 of the Paris Agreement deals with rules for carbon markets and voluntary international cooperation, which were agreed upon in Glasgow.[3] Article 6 contains three separate mechanisms for "voluntary cooperation" towards climate goals - two mechanisms are based on markets and a third is based on "non-market approaches".[4]
Statement II is correct because Article 6 establishes rules for carbon markets[3], and it closed the double counting/double claiming of carbon emission cuts[3], which are fundamental principles of carbon market functioning.
Statement III is also correct as Article 6 explicitly provides for non-market approaches as one of its three mechanisms for voluntary cooperation[4] to help countries reach their climate targets.
Both statements explain why Article 6 is frequently discussed in global climate discussions (Statement I) - the establishment of carbon market principles and provision for non-market cooperation are crucial mechanisms for countries to achieve their climate goals under the Paris Agreement. Therefore, option A is correct.
Sources- [1] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- [3] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- [4] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.1Lo..2.. Article 6 > p. 331
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Index Check' question derived directly from standard texts like Shankar IAS. It rewards aspirants who didn't just stop at 'Paris Agreement = 1.5Β°C' but read the specific operational sub-headings. If you knew Article 6 is the 'trading engine' of the treaty, this was a free hit.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change is frequently discussed in international/global discussions on sustainable development and climate change.
- Statement 2: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change sets out principles for international carbon markets.
- Statement 3: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change provides for non-market approaches to cooperation between countries to help them achieve their climate targets.
- Explicitly discusses Article 6 rules (carbon markets and voluntary international cooperation).
- Notes that Article 6 rules were negotiated and agreed at Glasgow (a major international forum).
- Addresses carbon-credit double counting, a core issue linked to Article 6 market mechanisms.
- Highlights active disagreement among countries, implying ongoing international discussion.
- Explains that the Paris Agreement requires further elaboration through a 'Paris rulebook', implying Article 6 is subject to continuing international negotiation.
- Connects procedural COP sessions (Marrakech) to the operationalization of Paris provisions.
- Explicitly links Article 6 to rules for carbon markets and voluntary international cooperation.
- Lists concrete Article 6 outcomes (agreement in Glasgow; carryover limits; measures on double counting and excluded credits).
- Describes the Paris Agreement principle that a country selling offset credits cannot also count those emissions cuts toward its own targets.
- This rule addresses core integrity issues central to international carbon market principles (double-counting prevention).
- Identifies the Partnership for Market Readiness as promoting market readiness for international carbon markets.
- Illustrates institutional and technical support mechanisms that enable implementation of market-based approaches under the Paris framework.
- Explicitly describes three mechanisms for voluntary cooperation tied to Article 6, noting two are market-based and a third is based on 'non-market approaches'.
- Entry is from the Article 6 section, so the reference to a 'non-markel approach' directly ties that concept to Article 6.
- Identifies Article 6 as covering carbon markets and voluntary international cooperation, linking Article 6 to cooperative mechanisms beyond purely domestic action.
- Supports the view that Article 6 encompasses different cooperation modalities (market and non-market) by referencing rules for carbon markets and cooperation.
- Addresses accounting issues (double counting) arising from international transfers of emission reductions, which is central to designing both market and non-market cooperation under Article 6.
- Provides contextual support about why distinct cooperation mechanisms (including non-market) are specified to preserve integrity of targets.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct hit from Shankar IAS Ch. 24 (Climate Organizations) or any basic COP26/Glasgow summary.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: UNFCCC Mechanisms > Paris Agreement > Operational Rules (The 'Paris Rulebook').
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the Article 6 Trinity: Art 6.2 (ITMOs - bilateral trading), Art 6.4 (Sustainable Development Mechanism - centralized UN market replacing Kyoto's CDM), and Art 6.8 (Non-market approaches like aid/tech transfer). Also, know 'OMGE' (Overall Mitigation in Global Emissions).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Stop memorizing generic goals. Focus on the 'How'. How is the treaty implemented? The 'Mechanism' chapters (Kyoto's CDM, Paris's Art 6) are high-yield because they involve money and trade rules.
Article 6 establishes market mechanisms and rules for voluntary cooperation between countries to meet climate goals.
High-yield for UPSC because it explains a central mechanism used in international climate diplomacy and links mitigation policy to tradeable instruments; useful for questions on climate governance, international negotiations, and policy instruments.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Major outcomes > p. 335
The Paris Agreementβs provisions require detailed rules to be adopted through the Paris rulebook at international meetings.
Important for aspirants to understand how global agreements move from text to implementation via COP/CMA decisions; connects to topics on international law, multilateral processes, and implementation challenges (e.g., Katowice, Marrakech).
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 4.1c..1, Nationally determined contributions > p. 331
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > zorS > p. 323
Double counting and the carryover of past credits are core technical and political issues in international carbon-market discussions.
Knowing these specifics helps answer questions on the controversies and technicalities of market mechanisms, negotiator positions, and implications for national targets; useful in essays and policy-analysis questions.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Major outcomes > p. 335
Article 6 establishes the framework and negotiated rules for using market mechanisms and voluntary cooperation between countries to meet Paris goals.
High-yield for UPSC because it links climate diplomacy, international law and market instruments; helps answer questions on how countries meet NDCs, negotiate rules, and use carbon trading as a policy tool. Connects to topics on mitigation finance, international negotiations and national climate policy implementation.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 4.1c..1, Nationally determined contributions > p. 331
A core principle is that emission reductions sold as offsets cannot also be counted by the seller toward its own targets.
Vital for understanding integrity of carbon markets and disputes in climate negotiations; useful for questions on accounting, transparency, and credibility of NDCs. Links to broader themes of measurement, reporting, verification and trust in multilateral agreements.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Major outcomes > p. 335
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
Negotiations addressed whether and how credits generated under the Kyoto Protocol could be transferred into the Paris mechanism, including numerical limits.
Important for exam answers on continuity between climate regimes, negotiation trade-offs, and national interests in preserving past credits; enables discussion of negotiation outcomes, equity and market impacts. Connects to history of Kyoto mechanisms and Paris rulebook debates.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 2()01 > p. 322
Describes Article 6 as establishing three voluntary cooperation mechanisms, two market-based and one non-market approach.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often probe the mechanisms and modalities of the Paris Agreement. Mastering this clarifies distinctions between carbon markets, bilateral/multilateral cooperation, and alternatives used to meet NDCs, and links to COP negotiation outcomes.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.1Lo..2.. Article 6 > p. 331
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Article 6 (refer COP zr) > p. 336
The 'Share of Proceeds' Trap. Future Q: Which Article 6 mechanism mandates a levy to fund the Adaptation Fund? Answer: Article 6.4 (Centralized) mandates it; Article 6.2 (Bilateral) makes it voluntary. This was a major bone of contention at COP27.
Use the 'Diplomatic Consensus' Logic. International treaties are designed to please everyone. The West wants 'Markets' (Statement II), and the Global South/Socialists want 'Non-Market' aid (Statement III). To get a treaty signed, *both* usually have to be included. Therefore, if options suggest a mix of opposing mechanisms, both are likely correct.
Link to GS-3 (Economy/Energy): India's 'Carbon Credit Trading Scheme' (CCTS) under the Energy Conservation Amendment Act 2022 is designed to align with Article 6.2, allowing India to export credits. This turns climate policy into trade policy.