Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement-I : Recently, the United States of America (USA) and the European Union (EU) have launched the Trade and Technology Council'. Statement-II : The USA and the EU claim that through this they are trying to bring technological progress and physical productivity under their control. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 3 because Statement-I is factually accurate, while Statement-II misrepresents the objectives of the initiative.
Statement-I is correct: The USA and the European Union officially launched the Trade and Technology Council (TTC) during the EU-US Summit in June 2021. It serves as a high-level strategic forum to coordinate approaches to key global trade, economic, and technology issues based on shared democratic values.
Statement-II is incorrect: The stated goal of the TTC is not to bring productivity "under their control" in a restrictive sense. Instead, it aims to foster transatlantic cooperation, strengthen supply chains, promote responsible innovation, and set global standards for emerging technologies. The focus is on democratic sovereignty and competitiveness against non-market economies, rather than monopolistic control over physical productivity. Therefore, Statement-II is a false characterization of the council's diplomatic and economic mandate.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Headline vs. Fine Print' trap. While the launch (Statement I) was widely covered in newspapers, Statement II uses extreme, non-market language ('control physical productivity') to test your common sense about Western economic philosophy. It's a logic test disguised as a fact question.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: When was the United States–European Union Trade and Technology Council (TTC) launched and which parties established it?
- Statement 2: Do official United States and European Union statements describe the Trade and Technology Council as intending to bring technological progress and "physical productivity" under US and EU control?
- Explicitly states the TTC launch timing.
- Provides the month and year the TTC was launched (June 2021).
- Identifies the full name of the TTC linking the United States and the European Union.
- Describes the TTC as the coordination mechanism through which the United States engaged the EU, showing the two parties that established it.
Explains the establishment and institutional identity of the European Union (dates of formation), which identifies one party in any EU–level institution or partnership.
A student could combine the EU's existence (1992–93) with current affairs sources to seek when an EU-wide council with the US might have been launched and by whom.
Gives the timeline and political evolution that created the EU as a coherent actor in foreign/economic policy—useful to know the EU can enter formal councils with external partners.
Use this background to narrow searches to EU-level announcements (rather than individual member states) when verifying who set up the TTC and when.
Describes the EEC/EU role in eliminating trade barriers and developing common external trade policy—illustrates the EU's capacity to form trade/technology partnerships.
A student could infer such institutional trade roles make the EU the natural counterpart to the United States in a transatlantic Trade and Technology Council, then check news/official releases for launch details.
Summarizes the creation of an international trade organisation (WTO) and the norm of formal institutions to manage trade—shows precedent for establishing dedicated trade councils.
Use the pattern that major trade issues are handled by formal bodies to justify searching for an official launch event and the parties (i.e., national/regional governments) that created the TTC.
Gives an historical example (Concert of Europe) where major powers collectively founded a coordinating body—a pattern of great-power councils for cooperation.
Apply this pattern to modern great-power relations to hypothesize that leading powers (the United States and the EU as a bloc) could jointly establish a council, then verify the specific participants and date from contemporary sources.
- Official U.S. State Department text links the U.S.-EU Trade and Technology Council to active steps on technology policy.
- It explicitly says the Council can "facilitate technological advancements" and "shape the economic rules of the road," which indicates intent to shape/guide technological progress.
- A U.S. Trade Representative report describes the TTC as the principal coordination mechanism for U.S.-EU trade policy.
- It states the US and EU are "pursuing policy outcomes on trade and technology" that align with shared values — showing active policy-direction over technology and related economic activity.
- An academic analysis cites official language noting the US and EU aim to "shape the production, distribution and governance of technology."
- It quotes a senior U.S. official saying the US and EU "plan to align our approaches to trade and technology," indicating intent to coordinate control/management of technological direction.
Shows that trade agreements (e.g., the Information Technology Agreement) explicitly target high-technology products and supply chains.
A student could check whether the TTC's remit/language mirrors ITA-style coverage (semiconductors, telecoms, etc.) to infer if TTC statements aim to shape control over tech goods.
Describes an institutional 'Technology Mechanism' set up to facilitate technology development and transfer under an international body, illustrating how treaties create formal mechanisms to manage technology flows.
Compare the TTC's stated functions to this model of governance to see if TTC statements frame technology transfer as something to be coordinated or controlled by US/EU bodies.
Explains the EU's large share of world trade and its capacity to be 'assertive in trade disputes', implying institutional leverage to influence technology and trade policy.
Use this to judge whether TTC rhetoric about 'cooperation' could be operationalized by the EU's existing trade leverage to shape technological outcomes.
States' import policies explicitly aim to 'sustain ... technological upgradation' and modernisation, showing governments use trade policy to steer technological progress and productivity.
A student could test if TTC language parallels national import-policy goals—i.e., seeks to direct tech flows to boost 'physical productivity' under allied control.
Notes the EU's use of diplomacy, economic investments and negotiations (rather than force) to influence other states on issues including human rights and environment—an example of soft leverage in international policy domains.
Apply this pattern to technology: examine whether TTC statements employ similar diplomatic/economic instruments to steer technological progress and productivity.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap. Statement I is standard Current Affairs (The Hindu/IE International Page), but Statement II is a 'Language Trap'.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The shift from Globalisation to 'Strategic Autonomy' and 'Friend-shoring' in the post-COVID world.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize sibling strategic tech alliances: iCET (India-US), Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), Supply Chain Resilience Initiative (SCRI), and the 'Chip 4' Alliance. Know the difference between 'Decoupling' and 'De-risking'.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about US/EU bodies, apply the 'Market Economy Filter'. Western alliances aim for 'coordination', 'standards', or 'resilience'. They never aim for 'control of physical productivity'—that is command-economy language. Use this ideological mismatch to spot fake statements.
Knowing the Maastricht Treaty and the year the EU was established frames timelines for later EU external initiatives and institutions.
High-yield: questions often require dating major EU milestones and linking legal foundations to contemporary policies. This concept connects to EU foreign policy, trade agreements, and institutional authority, enabling chronological and institutional analysis in answers.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > European Union Flag - Euro Currency > p. 258
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > European Union > p. 16
The sequential stages of integration explain how economic and political cooperation progressed to create a unified market affecting trade policy.
High-yield: UPSC often asks about the evolution of regional integration and its impact on trade regimes; mastering this helps analyse the EU's negotiation capacity and the historical basis of its trade and technology posture.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > TIMELINE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION > p. 18
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > EEC in Session > p. 257
Distinct features of an economic union clarify what common policies and freedoms the EU can exercise in external trade and economic coordination.
High-yield: comparative questions test differences between customs union, common market and economic union; this aids essays and policy analysis on regional trade blocs and how collective economic policy affects international agreements.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 17: India’s Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade > Economic Union Commenting Unions Currency > p. 504
The ITA eliminates tariffs on a wide range of high-technology products (computers, telecom equipment, semiconductors and related parts), shaping how countries trade advanced technologies.
High-yield for UPSC because it links trade liberalization to technology diffusion and industrial policy; helps analyse how plurilateral WTO arrangements affect domestic manufacturing competitiveness and international supply chains. Useful for questions on trade policy, technology trade, and multilateral negotiations.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 13: International Organizations > 13.5.3Information Technology Agreement (ITA) > p. 383
The EU's large GDP, substantial share of world trade, and diplomatic tools give it leverage in trade disputes and capacity to influence other major powers' policies.
Essential for UPSC aspirants to evaluate the EU as an international actor—relevant to questions on comparative economic power, currency influence, and trade diplomacy. Connects to topics on geopolitical competition, trade negotiations, and multilateral institutions.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > European Union > p. 17
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > TIMELINE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION > p. 18
The Technology Mechanism is designed to facilitate technology development and transfer to support mitigation and adaptation actions in climate policy.
Important for environment and international relations sections: links climate governance to technology transfer, capacity building, and international cooperation. Prepares candidates for questions on climate finance, technology transfer obligations, and institutional mechanisms under COP.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Technology Mechanism > p. 328
The 'Minerals Security Partnership' (MSP). Just as TTC secures tech, MSP secures critical minerals (Lithium, Cobalt). India was inducted recently. Expect a question on its members (14 countries + EU) or its specific goal (breaking Chinese monopoly).
The 'Capitalist Litmus Test'. The US and EU are free-market economies. They do not claim to bring 'physical productivity' (a factory-level metric) under state control. That phrasing sounds like a Soviet Five-Year Plan. If a statement attributes 'total control of production' to the US/EU, it is 99% False.
Mains GS-2 (IR) & GS-3 (Security): The TTC is an example of the 'Weaponization of Interdependence'. Use it to argue how trade is no longer just economics but national security, forcing India to pursue 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' in semiconductors.