Question map
Consider the following organizations/bodies in India : 1. The National Commission for Backward Classes 2. The National Human Rights Commission 3. The National Law Commission 4. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission How many of the above are constitutional bodies?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (Only one) because among the four listed organizations, only the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is a constitutional body.
- National Commission for Backward Classes: Originally a statutory body, it was granted constitutional status via the 102nd Amendment Act, 2018, inserting Article 338B into the Constitution.
- National Human Rights Commission (NHRC): It is a statutory body established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- National Law Commission: It is an executive body established by an order of the Government of India; it has neither constitutional nor statutory status.
- National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): It is a statutory, quasi-judicial body established under the Consumer Protection Act.
Since only the NCBC is mandated by the Constitution, Option 1 is the accurate choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a 'Bread and Butter' Polity question; missing this is fatal for your cutoff chances. It comes directly from the Table of Contents of standard books like Laxmikanth, specifically the classification of bodies into Constitutional, Statutory, and Executive. The only 'current affairs' edge is knowing the 102nd Amendment (2018) elevated NCBC to constitutional status.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the National Commission for Backward Classes in India a constitutional body established under the Constitution of India?
- Statement 2: Is the National Human Rights Commission in India a constitutional body established under the Constitution of India?
- Statement 3: Is the National Law Commission in India a constitutional body established under the Constitution of India?
- Statement 4: Is the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in India a constitutional body established under the Constitution of India?
- States that the 102nd Amendment Act of 2018 conferred constitutional status on the Commission.
- Specifies the insertion of Article 338-B in the Constitution, after which the Commission ceased to be a statutory body and became constitutional.
- Identifies that the Constitution (102nd Amendment) Act, 2018 inserted Article 338B to provide Constitutional status to the NCBC.
- Links the amendment explicitly to constitutional recognition of the Commission for socially and educationally backward classes.
- Records that the One Hundred and Second Amendment Act, 2018 conferred constitutional status on the NCBC which had been set up in 1993 by an Act of Parliament.
- Summarises the amendment's effect of elevating NCBC from a statutory to a constitutional body.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.