Consider the following statements : 1. If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court of India, all acts done by him/her in the performance of duties of his/her office of President before the date of decision become invalid. 2. Election for the post of the President of India can be postponed on the ground that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved and elections are yet to take place. 3. When a Bill is presented to the President of India, the Constitution prescribes time limits within which he/she has to declare his/her assent. How many of the above statements are correct?

The Constitution vests exclusive and final authority to decide disputes about Presidential and Vice‑Presidential elections in the Supreme Court.

High‑yield for constitutional law questions on election disputes and remedies; connects to judicial review and separation of powers. Mastering this enables answers on which forums decide different election contests and on post‑election legal consequences.

A judicial declaration voiding a President's election does not invalidate acts performed by that person prior to the decision.

Crucial for questions about legal continuity and state actions — shows how courts avoid disrupting governance despite later findings on legitimacy. Useful in scenarios on retrospective invalidation and administrative stability.

The President cannot be made answerable to courts for exercise of official powers and duties during the term of office.

Important for topics on constitutional immunities (prevents immediate legal challenges to official acts), links to Articles governing executive privileges and procedural bars on suits. Helps answer questions on limits of judicial remedies against incumbents.

The President is elected by an electoral college consisting of elected members of Parliament and elected members of State Legislative Assemblies; this determines who may vote.

High-yield for questions on presidential election procedure and constitutional provisions; connects to Articles defining roles of Union and State legislatures and ties into centre-state electoral dynamics. Mastery enables answering questions about voter eligibility and consequences of vacancies/dissolution.

Dissolution of a State Assembly causes its members to cease being qualified to vote in the presidential election, even if fresh assembly elections are pending.

Crucial for resolving procedural questions about timing of presidential elections versus state assembly elections; helps distinguish between altering electorate composition and postponing national elections. Useful for case-based questions on electoral timing and constitutional interpretation.

Constitutional concern for uniform representation and parity between states and the Union shapes rules for the presidential electoral process.

Important for conceptual questions on federal balance in constitutional design and how representation rules affect election mechanics; connects to centre-state relations and representation-weight calculations in competitive questions.

The absence of any constitutional time-limit allows the President to withhold action on a Bill indefinitely, creating the pocket veto.

High-yield for UPSC because it explains an informal executive power that affects legislative outcomes and executive-legislative relations; it connects to comparative study (difference with US 10-day rule) and helps answer questions on types of vetoes and presidential discretion.