Question map
Consider the following statements : I. Indian Railways have prepared a National Rail Plan (NRP) to create a 'future ready' railway system by 2028. II. 'Kavach' is an Automatic Train Protection system developed in collaboration with Germany. III. 'Kavach' system consists of RFID tags fitted on track in station section. Which of the statements given above are not correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A because statements I and II are incorrect.
**Statement I is incorrect:** The National Rail Plan lays down the road map for capacity expansion of the railway network by 2030 to cater to growth up to 2050.[1] The rail budget envisages a future-ready green Indian Railways by 2030.[2] The target year is 2030, not 2028 as mentioned in the statement.
**Statement II is incorrect:** Kavach is an Automatic Train Protection (ATP) system which has been indigenously developed by Research Design and Standards Organisation (RDSO) in collaboration with Indian industry[3], not in collaboration with Germany. It is a completely indigenous system.
**Statement III is correct:** Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags are placed throughout the entire track length to enable the Kavach system to track train positions[4], which includes station sections. Therefore, statements I and II are not correct, making option A the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2022-23/economicsurvey/doc/echapter.pdf
- [2] https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-03/Efficiency%20and%20competitiveness%20of%20Indian%20Railways.pdf
- [3] https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/mar/doc202231424701.pdf
- [4] https://www.pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=153556&ModuleId=3
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Metadata Swap' trap. The examiner took real current affairs (NRP, Kavach) and swapped the 'Target Year' (2030 â 2028) and the 'Origin' (Indigenous â Germany). Standard books discuss rail problems generally, but only specific PIB tracking of flagship schemes solves this.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did Indian Railways prepare a National Rail Plan (NRP) that aims to create a "future ready" railway system by 2028?
- Statement 2: Was "Kavach," the Automatic Train Protection system of Indian Railways, developed in collaboration with Germany?
- Statement 3: Does the Indian Railways "Kavach" system consist of RFID tags fitted on the track in station sections?
- Directly names the National Rail Plan and uses the phrase 'future ready' for the railway system.
- Specifies the roadmap timeframe as 'by 2030', which does not match the 2028 date in the statement.
- Refers to a 'future-ready' Indian Railways in official planning context.
- Sets the target year as 2030 ('future-ready green Indian Railways by 2030'), not 2028.
Mentions an explicit longârange 'vision 2020' for Indian Railways with concrete technical strategies â shows Indian Railways produces named strategic/vision documents with target horizons.
A student could infer that similar strategic plans (like an NRP) with a target year are consistent with this institutional practice and then look for an NRP document or announcement with a 2028 horizon.
Describes 'Setu Bharatam' as a government scheme with a specified completion year (2019) â example of government transport programmes setting explicit deadlines.
Use the pattern that ministries set target years for infrastructure programmes to judge plausibility of an NRP targeting 2028 and then search official releases for a 2028 target.
Describes structured modernization models (PPP, foreign collaboration, Swiss Challenge) for station redevelopment â evidence of organized, programmatic modernization efforts.
A student could treat 'future ready' as modernization and expect an overarching plan (NRP) coordinating such models; then check for a national plan that integrates these approaches with a timeline to 2028.
Explains policy changes (100% FDI in rail infrastructure) to meet capital needs â indicates recent policy-level initiatives to reform and invest in rail infrastructure.
Combine this with the idea of a national plan: if policy reforms aim to attract investment, an NRP could plausibly set a target year (2028) for implementation; student should verify via official policy documents or the Railway Ministry.
Lists planned highâspeed rail corridors and discusses building new corridors â shows planning of major rail projects with corridorâlevel timelines.
A student could infer that corridor planning fits within broader national rail planning and thus search those project announcements or the consolidated NRP to see if they reference a 2028 'future ready' goal.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.