Question map
Ashokan inscriptions suggest that the 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka' and Yukta' were important officers at the
Explanation
Ashokan inscriptions suggest that the "Pradeshika", "Rajuka" and "Yukta[2]" were important officers at the district level.[1] These officials had specific roles: yuktas were subordinate officials, rajjukas were rural administrators, and pradesikas were heads of the districts.[5] Ashoka instructed these officers to go on tours every five years to instruct people in dhamma (Major Rock Edict 3).[3] This clearly establishes their role in district-level administration rather than at village, provincial, or central levels. The district level was an important tier in the Mauryan administrative hierarchy, and these three categories of officers formed the backbone of governance at this level, implementing royal policies and maintaining administrative oversight in their respective districts.
Sources- [2] https://www.spcmc.ac.in/uploads/1707380061_Mauryan-Administration-copy.pdf
- [3] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
- [4] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
- [5] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Term-Definition' question sourced directly from standard textbooks (TN Board Class XI). The strategy is simple: when studying ancient polities (Mauryan, Gupta, Chola), you must create a 3-column table: Term — Function — Administrative Level. Reading the text passively without categorizing the hierarchy (Central vs. District vs. Village) is the mistake here.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did Ashokan inscriptions identify 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka', and 'Yukta' as officers of village-level administration?
- Statement 2: Did Ashokan inscriptions identify 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka', and 'Yukta' as officers of district-level administration?
- Statement 3: Did Ashokan inscriptions identify 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka', and 'Yukta' as officers of provincial administration?
- Statement 4: Did Ashokan inscriptions identify 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka', and 'Yukta' as officers of the central administration?
- The passage explicitly states these titles were officers at the district level, which contradicts the claim they were village-level officers.
- It ties the terms 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka' and 'Yukta' directly to Ashokan inscriptions, showing the inscriptions place them at a higher administrative tier than village.
- This passage likewise identifies pradeshika, rajuka, and yukta as important officers at the district level.
- It reinforces that the roles belong to district administration rather than village administration.
Explicitly names yuktas (subordinate officials), rajjukas (rural administrators) and pradesikas (heads of the districts) in Ashoka's Major Rock Edict 3 — showing the inscriptions record administrative titles and duties.
A student could examine the exact Edict 3 text or translations to check context (local vs. district duties) and whether duties described are village-level.
Notes Asokan inscriptions list the empire's major political/provincial centres and convey a uniform administrative message across regions.
Use this pattern to infer Ashokan inscriptions often dealt with administrative matters, so investigate whether the named officers appear alongside district/village contexts in those inscriptions.
States Ashokan edicts present a picture of political condition in south India and list neighbouring ruling houses, indicating the edicts record political-administrative information beyond ideology.
Compare the kinds of administrative names found in the edicts with later local records to judge whether terms denote village- or higher-level offices.
Describes later (Gupta-period) village-level offices (e.g., gramika, gramadhyaksha, mahattara), illustrating a historical pattern of inscriptions recording specific local office-holders.
Use this comparative pattern to assess whether the Ashokan titles could plausibly denote village officials by analogy with later known village offices.
Lists traditional village officials in South India (nala-kavundas, kamunda, karana etc.), showing terminology and roles at village level are commonly recorded regionally.
A student might compare the functions associated with these well-attested village offices to the functions ascribed to yuktas/rajjukas/pradesikas in Ashokan texts to evaluate their likely administrative level.
- Directly names yuktas, rajjukas and pradesikas as officials and gives brief functional labels (subordinate officials, rural administrators, heads of districts).
- Specifies these officers were instructed (Major Rock Edict 3) to undertake administrative tours, implying an official district-level role.
- Uses the actual Ashokan edict context to link the terms to administrative duties rather than generic titles.
- Identifies the Major Rock Edicts as the concrete corpus of Ashokan inscriptions which carry administrative directives.
- Establishes the geographic and textual reach of the edicts, supporting the credibility of the administrative titles recorded in them.
- Major Rock Edict 3 explicitly names yuktas (subordinate officials), rajjukas (rural administrators) and pradesikas (heads of districts).
- Text records Ashoka's instruction that these officers undertake five-yearly tours to instruct people in dhamma, implying administrative roles.
- Ashokan inscriptions list major provincial centres (Taxila, Ujjayini, Tosali, Suvarnagiri) alongside the capital, showing a provincial administrative framework.
- The widespread, uniform nature of these inscriptions across regions supports the existence of organized provincial administration where such officers would function.
- Explicitly names yuktas, rajjukas and pradesikas as 'his officials' in the context of Royal instructions (Major Rock Edict 3).
- Provides functional descriptions: yuktas = subordinate officials, rajjukas = rural administrators, pradesikas = district heads.
- Records a central directive requiring these officials to undertake five-year tours to instruct people in dhamma, indicating they acted under royal/central authority.
- Lists major political centres named in Ashokan inscriptions and notes that virtually the same message was engraved everywhere.
- Supports the idea of a uniform, centrally issued administrative message that these officers would carry out across regions.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct lift from TN History Class XI (2024), Chapter 4, p. 55. If you read the chapter on Mauryan Administration, this is unmissable.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Mauryan Bureaucracy & Administrative Hierarchy. Specifically, the decentralization of power from Pataliputra to the provinces and districts.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the hierarchy: 1. Central: Tirthas (18 top officials), Adhyakshas (27 heads e.g., Sitadhyaksha-Agriculture, Panyadhyaksha-Commerce). 2. District/Intermediary: Pradeshika (Head), Rajuka (Revenue/Justice), Yukta (Subordinate/Accounts), Sthanika (Tax collection for 100 villages). 3. Village: Gramika (Head), Gramani. 4. City: Nagaraka (City Superintendent), Astinomi (Megasthenes' 6 committees).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not just memorize the name; memorize the 'Jurisdiction'. UPSC traps usually involve swapping levels (e.g., calling a 'Pradeshika' a village headman). Ask yourself: Does this officer sit in the capital, tour a district, or stay in a village?
Yuktas, rajjukas and pradesikas are named as officials in the Ashokan inscriptions.
High-yield for questions on Mauryan administration: knowing the specific officer titles helps distinguish levels and functions of governance. It links to later administrative terminology and is useful for comparative questions on ancient Indian bureaucracy.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
Ashokan inscriptions distinguish pradesikas as district heads and rajjukas as rural administrators, demonstrating hierarchical administrative levels rather than uniform village-level roles.
Important for answering questions on administrative structure and decentralisation under the Mauryas; helps frame contrast between district, rural and village officials and connect to later regional developments.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART I, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Kings, Farmers and Towns > 3.2 Administering the empire > p. 32
The inscriptions instruct these officers to undertake five-year tours to propagate dhamma, showing their active administrative and supervisory roles.
Useful for essay and mains answers on state policy and governance under Ashoka; demonstrates how edicts served administrative, moral and integrative purposes and can be used to explain mechanisms of control and communication.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
These are the specific officer-designations used in Ashokan inscriptions for subordinate, rural and district heads.
High-yield for ancient Indian polity questions: recognizing these terms helps answer questions on Mauryan local administration and bureaucratic nomenclature. It links to topics on administrative hierarchy and role-based functions in the Mauryan state and aids comparison with later administrative systems.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
Major Rock Edicts are the inscriptional source through which Ashoka recorded instructions to officials and identified administrative personnel.
Essential for source-based questions: knowing that administrative rules and officer-names are preserved in the Rock Edicts helps in source analysis and in evaluating claims about Mauryan governance. This concept connects to questions on epigraphy, territorial reach of inscriptions and reconstructing administrative practices.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Edicts of Ashoka > p. 52
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
Ashokan instructions require these officers to undertake five-year tours to instruct the populace, reflecting an inspectorial/district supervision mechanism.
Useful for conceptual questions on how central authority monitored local administration; explains mechanisms of governance beyond mere titles. This prepares aspirants for analytical questions comparing administrative control and implementation across ancient regimes.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
Yukta, Rajuka and Pradesika are named as subordinate official, rural administrator and district head in Ashokan inscriptions.
High-yield for questions on Mauryan administration and epigraphy; helps link inscriptional terminology to administrative functions and to differentiate local (rajuka/pradesika) from centrally appointed officials. Useful for source-based and polity questions.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Emergence of State and Empire > Ashoka's Dharmic State > p. 55
The 'Rajukas' were initially revenue officers but were later granted judicial powers (Danda-samata and Vyavahara-samata) by Ashoka in Pillar Edict IV to ensure impartial justice. This evolution of power is a prime candidate for a future statement-based question.
Etymological Logic: 'Pradeshika' contains the root 'Pradesh' (Region/Province). A 'Pradesh' is linguistically too large to be a 'Village' (Option A). Conversely, 'Central' administration (Option D) is usually associated with Ministers (Mantri/Parisha). The requirement to go on 'tours every five years' (anusamyana) implies a jurisdiction that requires travel—fitting the 'District' level perfectly, as village officials are static and central officials are usually court-bound.
Mains GS-2 (Indian Administration): Use the 'Rajuka' as a historical precedent for the modern 'District Collector'. Just like the Rajuka combined revenue and judicial functions (magisterial powers) to maintain order, the British and subsequently the Indian administrative system retained this convergence of power at the district level.