Question map
Consider the following countries : I. Austria II. Bulgaria III. Croatia IV. Serbia V. Sweden VI. North Macedonia How many of the above are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization?
Explanation
NATO is an intergovernmental military alliance between 32 member states—30 in Europe and 2 in North America.[1] Among the listed countries, five are NATO members: Bulgaria, Croatia, Sweden, North Macedonia, and one other from the list.
Based on the documents and established NATO membership records, Bulgaria joined NATO in 2004, Croatia in 2009, North Macedonia achieved recent membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization[2], and Sweden became NATO's newest member in 2024. Austria maintains a policy of military neutrality and is not a NATO member. Serbia also remains outside NATO and has maintained a policy of military neutrality.
Sources
- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO
- [2] https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/345932/WHO-EURO-2021-3435-43194-60508-eng.pdf?sequence=1
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Current Affairs masquerading as Static' question. The trigger is Sweden's historic 2024 entry into NATO. The trap lies in assuming all Western European EU nations (like Austria) are in NATO, or that all Balkan nations (like Serbia) have joined. You don't need a list of 32 members; you need to know the 'Outliers' and the 'New Entrants'.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is Austria a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
- Statement 2: Is Bulgaria a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
- Statement 3: Is Croatia a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
- Statement 4: Is Serbia a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
- Statement 5: Is Sweden a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
- Statement 6: Is North Macedonia a member state of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)?
Lists countries that joined the EU in 1995 — Austria is explicitly named as an EU member that year.
A student can use this to note that Austria is an EU member (1995) and then check external lists to see whether EU membership coincides with NATO membership for those countries.
Explains that after the Soviet bloc ended, some new states (Baltic and east European) sought NATO membership.
A student could use this pattern to distinguish which post‑Cold War European states sought NATO membership and then see whether Austria was among those actively seeking NATO entry.
Describes the origin/purpose of NATO as a Western collective defence formed from insecurity about communism.
A student can use the stated purpose to infer which European states aligned with Western defence structures and then check whether Austria — given its political stance — fits that pattern.
Shows the existence of a Cold War military bloc (Warsaw Pact) formed in response to NATO membership expansion (example: West Germany joining NATO).
A student could extend this rule that NATO membership was a politically consequential choice for European states and therefore verify whether Austria made such a choice historically.
Notes historical treaty provisions about Austria's independence (Treaty of Versailles/Treaty of St. Germain) emphasizing Austria as a distinct state.
A student can combine Austria's long‑recognized independent status with later Cold War patterns to check whether Austria joined Western defence pacts like NATO.
Lists Bulgaria as a member of the Warsaw Pact (Soviet-aligned military bloc), which establishes its Cold War alignment opposite NATO.
A student could use the fact that many former Warsaw Pact states shifted alliances after 1990 to check whether Bulgaria later sought Western institutions like NATO.
Notes that many Baltic and East European states wanted to join the European Union and become part of NATO after the Soviet bloc ended.
One can extend this pattern to ask whether Bulgaria — an East European state — followed the same trajectory and then verify its NATO accession date from an external source.
Shows Bulgaria joined the European Union in 2007, indicating a westward/European integration trajectory in the post-Cold War period.
Given EU accession often coincided with Euro-Atlantic integration for several states, a student could check whether Bulgaria also joined NATO (using a map or timeline of NATO enlargements).
Provides context about NATO as the US-Western security organisation formed in response to Communist expansion.
Using this definition, a student can infer that former Communist-aligned countries were candidates for NATO membership after the Cold War and then look up Bulgaria specifically in NATO enlargement records.
Includes an exercise prompt to 'Trace the background of the formation of NATO', highlighting that NATO enlargement and its rivals (e.g., Warsaw Pact) are a topic to study.
A student could follow that suggested line of study to compare timelines of NATO enlargement with Bulgaria's post-1990 political changes to assess likelihood of membership.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
States of post‑Cold War Europe (example: Croatia) are noted as joining European institutions (Croatia became the 28th EU member in 2013), suggesting integration into Euro‑Atlantic structures.
A student could use this pattern plus a map/timeline of post‑1991 European states to check whether Croatia followed the common path of EU entrants also joining NATO.
The snippet states that many Baltic and East European states wanted to join the EU and 'become part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO)', establishing a general rule that post‑Soviet/ Eastern European countries sought NATO membership.
Apply this rule to Balkan successor states of Yugoslavia (including Croatia) to infer they were candidates for NATO accession and then verify with accession dates.
Mentions NATO intervention in the Yugoslav conflicts and bombing of Yugoslavia — indicating NATO engagement in the Balkans and operational relations with successor states like Croatia.
From NATO's active role in the region, a student could reasonably investigate whether Balkan states (Croatia among them) later formalized ties by joining NATO.
Describes NATO expansion implications (West Germany joining NATO provoked a Warsaw Pact response), illustrating that NATO has historically expanded by incorporating European states.
Use the general pattern of NATO expansion into Europe to consider whether later European entrants (e.g., former Yugoslav republics) were admitted to NATO and check specific membership records for Croatia.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
Defines NATO as an organisation formed because Western European countries felt insecure and sought US-led collective security.
A student could use this rule to check whether Serbia is typically categorised with the 'Western European' states that originally joined NATO or with other regional groupings.
Lists members of the Warsaw Pact (Soviet-aligned Eastern European states), illustrating a Cold War divide between NATO and Soviet blocs.
A student can place Serbia (and its predecessors) on a Cold War map to see whether it fell into NATO, Warsaw Pact, or a non-aligned category, which informs likelihood of NATO membership.
Notes that after the Soviet bloc ended, many Baltic and East European states sought to join NATO.
A student can compare Serbia's post-Cold War political trajectory (whether it is one of those East European applicants) against the list of states that joined NATO to judge membership probability.
Discusses Serbia's historical conflicts in the Balkans, indicating Serbia is a Balkan state with its own regional history distinct from Western Europe.
A student could use basic geography (Balkan location) plus this regional history to check whether Balkan states were NATO members or not, narrowing the search for Serbia's status.
Mentions Serbia explicitly in the context of early 20th-century wars, confirming Serbia is a distinct historical polity in Europe rather than a Baltic/East European Soviet-bloc state.
A student can combine this identification with knowledge of which European countries joined NATO to assess whether Serbia appears among NATO member states.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
Shows Sweden's European integration milestone (joined the EU in 1995), placing it among European states that might or might not join NATO.
A student could compare lists/maps of EU members versus NATO members to see whether Sweden appears in both.
Explains that after the Soviet bloc ended, several Baltic and East European states sought NATO membership — establishes a pattern of post‑Cold War European states joining NATO.
A student could apply this pattern to Western/Nordic Europe and check if Sweden followed that same post‑Cold War joining trend using a NATO membership list or map.
Describes NATO's expansion (e.g., West Germany joining) provoking counter‑alliances, indicating NATO has added European states beyond its original members.
A student could use the pattern of NATO expanding to check whether other European countries (including Sweden) were later added by consulting an expansion timeline or map.
Notes that Denmark and Sweden resisted certain EU integration steps (Maastricht/euro), suggesting Sweden has been cautious about supranational commitments.
Using this inclination toward caution, a student might hypothesize Sweden historically maintained neutrality and then verify via a NATO membership roster or timeline.
Shows Sweden participates in international coalitions (e.g., climate alliance) alongside other European states, indicating active international engagement but not necessarily NATO membership.
A student could note that participation in other multilateral groups does not imply NATO membership and thus check a definitive NATO member list to confirm Sweden's status.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly refers to "recent membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization" in connection with North Macedonia.
- Names North Macedonia directly, tying the country to NATO membership.
- Phrase indicates the membership is current/recent, supporting a positive answer to the question.
Explains a clear post‑Cold War pattern: many new countries from the Baltic and Eastern Europe sought to join NATO.
A student can locate North Macedonia on a map (it is a new/European state after the Soviet-era reshuffle) and ask whether it followed the same east/central European accession pattern to NATO.
Mentions the formal country name 'Republic of North Macedonia', confirming the state's modern identity used in international institutions.
Knowing the exact modern name lets a student search contemporary NATO membership lists or news for 'Republic of North Macedonia' rather than older names, improving verification.
Gives background on NATO's role as a US‑led Western alliance that attracted concern from others, implying it is an organization countries aimed to join for security.
A student can combine this with North Macedonia's geographic location in Europe to assess whether joining NATO would fit regional security motivations.
Describes NATO–Warsaw Pact rivalry and that Western European states joined NATO (e.g., West Germany), showing NATO expansion is regionally significant in Europe.
A student could infer that European countries, including those in the Balkans, have been candidates or targets for NATO expansion and then check if North Macedonia was among them.
Defines NATO as the US‑led camp during the Cold War, highlighting that non‑aligned countries later had to choose alignment or join such alliances.
A student can use this to reason that after Cold War shifts, European countries like North Macedonia might have moved toward Western security structures and then verify membership.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Current Affairs-Linked Map Question. Triggered by the Russia-Ukraine war pushing Finland (2023) and Sweden (2024) into NATO.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: 'European Security Architecture'. Specifically, the distinction between EU membership (economic/political) and NATO membership (military).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'EU-but-not-NATO' list: Austria, Cyprus, Ireland, Malta. Memorize the 'Recent NATO' timeline: Montenegro (2017) -> N. Macedonia (2020) -> Finland (2023) -> Sweden (2024).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not memorize the list of 32. Instead, group them: 1. The Founders. 2. The Post-Soviet Wave (Baltics/Poland). 3. The Balkan Wave (Croatia/N. Macedonia). 4. The Neutral Converts (Sweden/Finland). 5. The Holdouts (Serbia/Austria).
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
NATO is a Western collective security alliance formed after WWII in response to Western European insecurity and communist expansion.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often test Cold War institutions, post‑WWII security arrangements, and their political rationale. Mastery helps connect answers on collective security, US-European relations, and the evolution of Western alliances.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) > p. 247
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 1: The End of Bipolarity > Consequences of Disintegration > p. 7
The USSR and its European allies created the Warsaw Pact in 1955 as a counter‑arrangement to NATO.
Important for explaining bipolar security structures during the Cold War and contrasting alliance systems. Useful for questions on bloc politics, alliance dynamics, and the security choices of Eastern European states.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > Warsaw Treaty Organisation > p. 248
Joining the European Union (e.g., Austria in 1995) is distinct from joining a military alliance like NATO.
Essential for distinguishing economic/political integration from security commitments in polity and foreign policy questions. Helps prevent conflation of EU accession with defence alignment in exam answers.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > TIMELINE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION > p. 18
Bulgaria was a member of the Warsaw Pact, so understanding its Cold War alliance helps situate its historical alignment relative to NATO.
High-yield for Modern History and International Relations: knowing which states belonged to the Warsaw Pact vs NATO clarifies bloc politics, security commitments, and post-1945 foreign policies. This enables answers on alliance systems, causes of rivalry, and continuity/change in state alignments.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > Warsaw Treaty Organisation > p. 248
Many East European countries sought NATO membership after the Cold War, while countries like Bulgaria joined the EU in 2007, reflecting choices in post‑Soviet realignment.
Essential for questions on European integration and security architecture: distinguishes EU accession from NATO enlargement, explains regional strategic shifts, and helps tackle questions on enlargement waves and their political implications.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 1: The End of Bipolarity > Consequences of Disintegration > p. 7
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Contemporary Centres of Power > TIMELINE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION > p. 18
Cold War treaties (e.g., Warsaw Pact) invoked mutual defence obligations, the same conceptual idea that underpins alliances like NATO.
Crucial for understanding why alliances form and how they operate: prepares aspirants to analyse treaty texts, deterrence logic, and case studies of alliance commitments in questions on security policy and international law.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 15: The World after World War II > Warsaw Treaty Organisation > p. 248
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 1: The End of Bipolarity > Consequences of Disintegration > p. 7
NATO expanded after the end of the Soviet bloc as many East European states sought to join the alliance.
High-yield for UPSC: explains motives and timeline of European security realignment, links to EU enlargement and regional geopolitics, and helps answer questions on security architectures and alliance politics. Mastery enables answering prompts on causes, consequences, and membership patterns of western security institutions.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 1: The End of Bipolarity > Consequences of Disintegration > p. 7
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'CSTO' Trap. Just as NATO expanded, know the shrinking Russian equivalent (CSTO). Members: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan. (Armenia effectively froze participation in 2024). This is the mirror image question.
Apply the 'History & Geography' Logic:
1. **Serbia**: NATO bombed Belgrade in 1999. Public sentiment is anti-NATO. Unlikely to be a member. (Eliminate Serbia).
2. **Austria**: Vienna is a global UN hub *specifically* because of its historical neutrality. It is constitutionally neutral. (Eliminate Austria).
3. **Sweden**: Was in news 24/7 for joining in 2024. (Keep).
4. **North Macedonia**: Changed its country name from 'Macedonia' just to appease Greece and join NATO. (Keep).
Result: 2 eliminated, leaving 4 likely members.
Mains GS-2 (IR): The concept of 'Strategic Autonomy' vs 'Alliance System'. Austria and Ireland maintain military neutrality (similar to India's non-alignment roots), whereas Sweden abandoned it for collective defence. Use this contrast when discussing India's refusal to join 'Asian NATO'.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.