GS2 2024 Q2 10 marks 150 words Alternative Dispute Resolution

UPSC Mains 2024 GS2 Q2 — Alternative Dispute Resolution

Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals, Whether they intertain civil as well as criminal cases? (Answer in 150 words) 10

Write your answer →

Similar Previous Year Questions

No closely related PYQs found in our 11-year corpus — this question explores a relatively unique angle. We only surface matches with substantive topical overlap, not loose adjacency.

Related Prelims MCQs

Build factual foundation — these MCQs cover facts/concepts you'll need for this Mains question.

Source Map — where to read

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) · Lok Adalats and Other Courts · p.376 Polity

"A Lok Adalat shall have the requisite powers to specify its own procedure for determining any dispute coming before it. Also, all proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code (1860) and every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of the Code of Criminal Procedure (1973). 6. An award of a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court or an order of any Other court. Every award made by a Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute.…"

Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. · Lok Adalats and Other Courts · p.376 Polity

"Also, all proceedings before a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of the Indian Penal Code (1860) and every Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for the purpose of the Code of Criminal Procedure (1973). 6. An award of a Lok Adalat shall be deemed to be a decree of a Civil Court or an order of any Other court. Every award made by a Lok Adalat shall be final and binding on all the parties to the dispute. No appeal shall lie to any court against the award of the Lok Adalat.…"

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) · Lok Adalats and Other Courts · p.375 Polity

"The Supreme Court has explained the meaning of the institution of Lok Adalat in the following way2: The 'Lok Adalat' is an old form of adjudicating system prevailed in ancient India and it's validity has not been taken away even in the modern days. The word 'Lok Adalat' means 'People's Court'. This system is based on Gandhian principles. It is one of the components of the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) system. As the Indian courts are overburdened with the backlog of cases and the regular courts are to decide the cases involving a lengthy, expensive and tedious procedure. In Lok Adalat p…"

Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. · Lok Adalats and Other Courts · p.375 Polity

"The Supreme Court has explained the meaning of the institution of Lok Adalat in the following way2: The 'Lok Adalat' is an old form of adjudicating system prevailed in ancient India and it's validity has not been taken away even in the modern days. The word 'Lok Adalat' means 'People's Court'. This system is based on Gandhian principles. It is one of the components of the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) system. As the Indian courts are overburdened with the backlog of cases and the regular courts are to decide the cases involving a lengthy, expensive and tedious procedure. In Lok Adalat p…"

Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. · Lok Adalats and Other Courts · p.377 Polity

"Ji According to the Supreme Court, the benefits under Lok Adalat are as follows3: • 1. There is no court fee and if court fee is already paid the amount will be refunded if the dispute is settled at Lok Adalat.• 2. The basic features of Lok Adalat are the procedural flexibility and speedy trial of the disputes. There is no strict application of procedural laws like the Civil Procedure Code and the Evidence Act while assessing the claim by Lok Adalat.• 3 3P.T Tho~as vs. Thomas Job (2005). 4. The award by the Lok Adalat is binding on the parties and it has the status of a decree of a civil court…"

How this topic is evolving

Context Update Connected to trend: Justice, Welfare, and Institutional Efficiency · 44 recent news items

While the 2024 query focused on the structural distinction between Lok Adalats and Arbitration, the discourse has shifted toward 'efficiency-led administrative missions' as a solution to the 5.1 crore case pendency. The focus is now on whether the jurisdictional limits of Permanent Lok Adalats and the decolonization intent of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) can effectively address institutional inertia without compromising constitutional entitlements.

A current examiner could reframe this as:

With over 5 crore cases pending in the Indian judiciary, critically examine the role of Permanent Lok Adalats in ensuring public utility efficiency. To what extent can the transition to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) resolve the systemic bottlenecks currently faced by the lower judiciary? (Answer in 250 words)

Why this framing: Implementation of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the 5.1 crore case pendency milestone.

Question Decoded — examiner's intent

Directive verbs
Explaindistinguish
Scope keywords
Lok AdalatsArbitration Tribunalscivil as well as criminal cases
Implicit sub-parts
  • Legal basis and source of authority for both mechanisms (NALSA Act vs Arbitration and Conciliation Act).
  • Structural differences in the selection and nature of presiding officers.
  • The binding nature of awards and the availability of appeal mechanisms for both.
  • Specific clarification on the nature of 'criminal cases'—specifically compoundable vs non-compoundable offenses.
Common pitfalls
  • Focusing too much on 'Gram Nyayalayas' or 'Mediation' instead of specifically 'Arbitration'.
  • Incorrectly stating that Lok Adalats can handle all criminal cases (they only handle compoundable offenses).
  • Failing to mention that Arbitration is primarily a private contract-based resolution while Lok Adalats are statutory judicial bodies.
  • Neglecting the finality of the award (Lok Adalats have the status of a civil decree with no appeal, unlike some arbitration awards).
Dimensions required
Legal/StatutoryProceduralJurisdictionalComparative
Marks allocation hint

Allocate 30 words for a concise definition of both ADR mechanisms. Dedicate 60 words to a structured comparison (tabular or bulleted) of their functions and legal status. Use the final 60 words to explicitly address the 'civil vs criminal' question, highlighting the limitation to compoundable offenses in Lok Adalats and the strictly civil/commercial nature of Arbitration.

How examiners have framed this topic over the years

From debating constitutional validity to assessing specific ADR distinctions and the tangible impact of recent legislative rationalization reforms.

Depth Deepening Based on 5 cross-year PYQs

The examiner’s lens has transitioned from questioning the basic structural legitimacy and jurisdictional friction between tribunals and courts in 2018 (GS2 Q12) to analyzing their specific operational independence in 2019 (GS2 Q2). By 2024, the focus shifted toward a granular, comparative 'Explain and Distinguish' format between specific Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms like Lok Adalats and Arbitration. Subsequently, in 2025, the framing evolved to evaluate the impact of specific legislative interventions, specifically the 2021 rationalization reforms, moving from theoretical validity to practical legislative outcomes.

Dimensions tested
Constitutional validity and competencyJudicial independence of quasi-judicial bodiesComparison between ADR mechanisms (Lok Adalats vs. Arbitration)Impact of legislative reforms (Rationalization of Tribunals 2021)Jurisdictional overlap with ordinary courtsFunctional need vs. procedural efficiency
Angles still under-tested
The role of the 'Tribunal of Appeal' and the issue of direct appeals to the Supreme Court bypassing High Courts.The impact of digitalization and 'Online Dispute Resolution' (ODR) on the efficiency of Lok Adalats and Tribunals.Financial and administrative autonomy of tribunals—the debate over a 'National Tribunals Commission'.
PYQs this pattern was synthesized from

Answer Skeleton — fill this in

Introduction

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms like Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals aim to reduce judicial pendency and provide speedy justice outside the traditional court system [NCERT Class 11, Indian Constitution at Work].

Legal Basis and Nature

Distinct Statutory Frameworks

  • Lok Adalats: Statutory bodies under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, based on Gandhian principles [Laxmikant, Ch.34].
  • Arbitration: Private dispute resolution governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, often based on prior contractual agreements.

Key Distinctions

Procedural Differences

  • Lok Adalats: Informal procedure; no court fees; presided over by judicial officers and social workers [Laxmikant, Ch.34].
  • Arbitration: Semi-formal; parties choose the arbitrator; procedures are flexible but bound by the 1996 Act [PRS Legislative Research].

Finality of Award

  • Lok Adalat Award: Deemed a decree of a civil court; final and binding; no appeal lies against the award.
  • Arbitral Award: Binding, but can be challenged in court on limited grounds like procedural irregularities.

Jurisdiction: Civil and Criminal Cases

Scope of Entertaining Cases

  • Civil Cases: Both handle civil matters like property, labor, and matrimonial disputes.
  • Criminal Cases: Lok Adalats can only entertain compoundable criminal offenses; non-compoundable offenses are strictly excluded [Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987].
  • Arbitration: Generally restricted to commercial/civil disputes; criminal matters are not arbitrable as they are "actions in rem."

Conclusion

While Lok Adalats serve as a "People's Court" for social justice, Arbitration is a specialized tool for commercial efficiency. Strengthening both is vital to achieve the goal of "Access to Justice" for all, as envisioned under Article 39A.

Ready to practice?

Take this question, write your own answer in 150 words, and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where you stand.

Open evaluation workspace →