UPSC Mains 2022 GS4 Q7 — Corporate Ethics Case
Prabhat was working as Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric Ltd., a reputed multinational company. But presently the company was passing through the difficult times as the sales were continuously showing downward trend in the last two quarters. His division, which hitherto had been a major revenue contributor to the company's financial health, was now desperately trying to procure some big government order for them. But their best efforts did not yield any positive success or breakthrough. His was a professional company and his local bosses were under pressure from their London-based HO to show some positive results. In the last performance review meeting taken by the Executive Director (India Head), he was reprimanded for his poor performance. He assured them that his division is working on a special contract from the Ministry of Defence for a secret installation near Gwalior and tender is being submitted shortly. He was under extreme pressure and he was deeply perturbed. What aggravated the situation further was a warning from the top that if the deal is not clinched in favour of the company, his division might have to be closed and he may have to quit his lucrative job. There was another dimension which was causing him deep mental torture a and agony. This pertained to his personal precarious financial health. He was a single earner in the family with two school-college going children and his old ailing mother. The heavy expenditure on education and medical was causing a big strain to his monthly pay packet. Regular EMI for housing loan taken from bank was unavoidable and any default would render him liable for severe legal action. In the above backdrop, he was hoping for some miracle to happen. There was sudden turn of events. His secretary informed that a gentleman-SubhashVerma wanted to see him as he was interested in the position of Manager which was to be filled in by him in the company. He further brought to his notice that his CV has been received through the office of the Minister of Defence. During interview of the candidate-Subhash Verma, he found him technically sound, resourceful and experienced marketeer. He seemed to be well-conversant with tendering procedures and having knack of follow-up and liaising in this regard. Prabhat felt that he was better choice than the rest of the candidates who were recently interviewed by him in the last few days. Subhash Verma also indicated that he was in possession of the copies of the bid documents that the Unique Electronics Ltd. would be submitting the next day to the Defence Ministry for their tender. He offered to hand over those documents subject to his employment in the company on suitable terms and conditions. He made it clear that in the process, the Sterling Electric Ltd. could outbid their rival company and get the bid and hefty Defence Ministry order. He indicated that it will be win-win situation for both-him and the company. Prabhat was absolutely stunned. It was a mixed feeling of shock and thrill. He was uncomfortable and perspiring. If accepted, all his problems would vanish instantly and he may be rewarded for securing the much awaited tender and thereby boosting company's sales and financial health. He was in a fix as to the future course of action. He was wonder-struck at the guts of Subhash Verma in having surreptitiously removing his own company papers and offering to the rival company for a job. Being an experienced person, he was examining the pros and cons of the proposal/situation and he asked him to come the next day. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Prabhat in the above situation. (c) Which of the above would be the most appropriate for Prabhat and why? (Answer in 250 words)
Question Decoded — examiner's intent
- Directive verbs
- DiscussCritically examine
- Scope keywords
- ethical issuesprofessional companypersonal precarious financial healthsecret installation near Gwaliorsurreptitiously removing his own company paperswin-win situationoptions available
- Implicit sub-parts
- Analysis of the conflict between professional survival (livelihood) and integrity (means vs ends).
- Evaluation of the corporate espionage element and the compromise of national security interests in a MoD tender.
- Assessment of Subhash Verma’s character as a 'red flag' for future organizational risk.
- Justification of a course of action that balances ethical rectitude with practical career preservation.
- Common pitfalls
- Focusing too much on Prabhat’s personal financial misery (EMIs, ailing mother) rather than the ethical breach of using stolen documents.
- Ignoring the 'Secret Installation' and 'Ministry of Defence' context which elevates the case from mere corporate rivalry to a potential national security risk.
- Failing to recognize that hiring Subhash Verma is a long-term liability as he has already proven he can be disloyal to an employer.
- Suggesting a 'middle path' that involves using the information without hiring Subhash, which is equally unethical.
- Dimensions required
- Professional Ethics (Corporate Governance)Individual Ethics (Conscience and Financial Integrity)Legal/Regulatory (IPR and Official Secrets Act context)Prudential/Risk Management (Hiring a whistleblower vs. a thief)
- Marks allocation hint
Spend approximately 60-70 words on Part (a) identifying 4 key ethical dilemmas. Devote 100 words to Part (b) to explore at least three options (Accept, Reject, Report) with their respective pros and cons. Use the remaining 80-90 words for Part (c) to justify the rejection of the offer based on long-term character over short-term gain, emphasizing that a 'win-win' based on theft is an ethical loss.
Unlock the full analysis for this question
You've seen the question and its examiner-intent decoding. Subscribers also get:
- 🔗 Similar Previous Year Questions — cross-year, cross-paper matches so you study the topic, not the question
- 📚 Source Map — verified citations from Laxmikanth, NCERT, PRS, Yojana, Economic Survey, Spectrum
- 🌱 How this topic is evolving — current-affairs bridge anchored to live TARS news clustering
- 🧭 Examiner's Pattern — how the topic has been framed across every year UPSC has tested it
- ✍️ Answer Skeleton — a structured outline (intro → body → conclusion) you can flesh out
- 🎯 AI evaluation — write your answer, get rubric-based scoring from gs-eval
Or browse 132+ free preview questions across all years and papers — the first 3 questions of every paper are unlocked.
Ready to practice?
Subscribers can attempt this question in 250 words and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where they stand.
Subscribe to evaluate your answer →