UPSC Mains 2018 GS4 Q10 — Case Study: Environment vs Economy
A big corporate house is engaged in manufacturing industrial chemicals on a large scale. It proposes to set up an additional unit. Many States rejected its proposal due to detrimental effect on the environment. But one State government acceded to the request and permitted the unit close to a city, brushing aside all opposition. The unit was set up 10 years ago and was in full swing till recently. The pollution caused by the industrial effluents was affecting the land, water and crops in the area. It was also causing serious health problems to human beings and animals. This gave rise to a series of agitations demanding the closure of the plant. In a recent agitation thousands of people took part, creating a law and order problem necessitating stern police action. Following the public outcry, the State government ordered the closure of the factory. The closure of the factory resulted in the unemployment of not only those workers who were engaged in the factory but also those who were working in the ancillary units. It also very badly affected those industries which depended on the chemicals manufactured by it. As a senior officer entrusted with the responsibility of handling this issue, how are you going to address it ? (250 words)
Question Decoded — examiner's intent
- Directive verbs
- address
- Scope keywords
- additional unitdetrimental effect on the environmentbrushing aside all oppositionserious health problemslaw and order problemclosure of the factoryunemployment of workersancillary units
- Implicit sub-parts
- Identification of ethical dilemmas (Environment vs. Livelihood, Profit vs. Public Health).
- Analysis of the failures of the State and the Corporate House in the preceding decade.
- Short-term measures for managing the law and order situation and public outcry.
- Medium-term rehabilitation plan for direct and indirect workers rendered unemployed.
- Long-term policy recommendations for 'sustainable industrialization' and environmental remediation of the contaminated site.
- Common pitfalls
- Focusing only on the immediate law and order issue without addressing the long-term loss of livelihood.
- Proposing a permanent closure without suggesting a 'Green Transition' or technical upgradation of the plant.
- Ignoring the accountability of the State officials who allowed the unit 'brushing aside all opposition' 10 years ago.
- Failing to address the disruption in the supply chain for industries dependent on these chemicals.
- Dimensions required
- EthicalEconomicEnvironmentalAdministrative/RegulatorySocial-Legal
- Marks allocation hint
Allocate 50 words to identifying stakeholders and ethical issues. Dedicate 100 words to immediate and medium-term administrative actions (rehabilitation and compensation). Use the final 100 words to propose systemic reforms, such as environmental audits and balancing industrial growth with the 'Precautionary Principle' and 'Polluter Pays Principle'.
Unlock the full analysis for this question
You've seen the question and its examiner-intent decoding. Subscribers also get:
- 🔗 Similar Previous Year Questions — cross-year, cross-paper matches so you study the topic, not the question
- 📚 Source Map — verified citations from Laxmikanth, NCERT, PRS, Yojana, Economic Survey, Spectrum
- 🌱 How this topic is evolving — current-affairs bridge anchored to live TARS news clustering
- 🧭 Examiner's Pattern — how the topic has been framed across every year UPSC has tested it
- ✍️ Answer Skeleton — a structured outline (intro → body → conclusion) you can flesh out
- 🎯 AI evaluation — write your answer, get rubric-based scoring from gs-eval
Or browse 132+ free preview questions across all years and papers — the first 3 questions of every paper are unlocked.
Ready to practice?
Subscribers can attempt this question in 250 words and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where they stand.
Subscribe to evaluate your answer →