question_subject:
question_exam:
stats:
keywords:
Option 1 is true because the Lokpal Bill, 2013, does indeed provide for the creation of an anti-graft ombudsman to investigate corruption charges against public functionaries, which includes the Prime Minister, Ministers, and Members of Parliament.
Option 2 is false because the Lokpal Bill does not make it compulsory for states to create their own law for setting up Lokayuktas (anti-corruption ombudsmen) within a year. The Lokpal Bill focuses on the central government and does not impose requirements on the states.
Option 3 is false because states are not free to decide whether or not to set up Lokayuktas. The Lokpal Bill does not grant states the option to not establish Lokayuktas if they do not desire to do so.
Therefore, option 1 is the only correct statement.
Alert - correct answer should be option 1 and 3 only.