Question map
In the context of food and nutritional security of India, enhancing the 'Seed Replacement Rates' of various crops helps in achieving the food production targets of the future. But what is/are the constraint/constraints in its wider/greater implementation? 1. There is no National Seeds Policy in place. 2. There is no participation of private sector seed companies in the supply of quality seeds of vegetables and planting materials of horticultural crops. 3. There is a demand-supply gap regarding quality seeds in case of low value and high volume crops. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (3 only).
Let's evaluate each statement:
**Statement 1 is incorrect**: The National Seed Policy 2002 explicitly mentions that "Seed replacement rates will be raised progressively with [1]the objective of expanding the use of quality seeds." This confirms that a National Seeds Policy was indeed in place.
**Statement 2 is incorrect**: Private sector companies like Pioneer are credited for promoting hybrid seed-based farming in India and playing a great role in the Green Revolution.[2] This clearly demonstrates private sector participation in quality seed supply, contradicting the claim of no private sector involvement.
**Statement 3 is correct**: There is a demand-supply gap regarding quality seeds in case of low value and high volume crops.[3] Additionally, seeds are available for fruits, vegetables, flowers and high value crops but not enough seeds are supplied in the case of low value and high volume crops such as rice and wheat.[4] This constraint genuinely hinders wider implementation of improved seed replacement rates.
Therefore, only statement 3 is a valid constraint, making option B the correct answer.
Sources- [1] https://seednet.gov.in/material/National_Seed_Policy_2002.htm
- [2] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 11: Industries > 31. The Pioneer > p. 112
- [4] https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-08/Working-Group-Report-Demand-Supply-30-07-21.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question blends static policy knowledge (National Seeds Policy 2002) with economic common sense (private sector behavior). It tests if you understand the 'structural incentives' of Indian agriculture—why private players flock to high-margin veggies but ignore low-margin wheat/rice.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: As of 2014, in the context of food and nutritional security and efforts to improve Seed Replacement Rates in India, did India have a National Seeds Policy in place?
- Statement 2: As of 2014, in the context of food and nutritional security and efforts to improve Seed Replacement Rates in India, were private sector seed companies participating in supplying quality vegetable seeds and planting materials for horticultural crops?
- Statement 3: As of 2014, in the context of food and nutritional security and efforts to improve Seed Replacement Rates in India, was there a demand–supply gap for quality seeds of low-value, high-volume crops?
- The document is the National Seed Policy (2002), showing an official policy existed.
- Section 2.7 explicitly addresses raising seed replacement rates, linking the policy to the Seed Replacement Rates objective.
- An IAS prelim question option lists 'There is no National Seeds Policy in place' as a possible constraint, indicating the claim was contested or questioned in 2014.
- This passage shows the claim existed in exam options but does not itself confirm the absence of a policy.
This exam-style snippet lists 'There is no National Seeds Policy in place' as a stated constraint affecting seed replacement rates, indicating that the absence of a national policy was considered a possible problem in this context.
A student could take this claim as a lead to check contemporary government documents or policy timelines (circa 2013–2015) to verify whether an official National Seeds Policy existed then.
Describes the Seeds Act, 1966 as the legal framework for seed certification, showing that seed governance relied on older legislation rather than citing a newer national policy.
One could contrast the presence of the 1966 Act with the absence of mention of a National Seeds Policy in these texts to infer the likely policy environment and then verify with external policy records from ~2014.
Notes attempts to amend the 1966 Act (Seeds Bill 2004 did not materialise; Draft Seeds Bill, 2019 later), implying ongoing reform efforts and no settled new legislative/policy regime during the intervening years.
A student could infer that if major legislative reforms were unresolved through 2019, a distinct, formally adopted National Seeds Policy around 2014 was less likely and should be checked against official archives or ministry releases from 2014.
Provides data on low usage of certified and hybrid seeds and defines Seed Replacement Ratio, highlighting recognized problems that a National Seeds Policy might address.
One could use these performance indicators as reason to expect either an existing national policy addressing them or policy discussions; checking policy documents or official strategies from 2014 would clarify which was true.
- Explicitly mentions 'Monopoly of some private companies in seed production', showing private firms are active in seed production.
- Identifies private-sector behaviour (charging high prices), which implies substantive market participation rather than absence.
- Describes a reputed industrial house engaged in seed production and credited with promoting hybrid seed-based farming.
- Shows private industrial players produce and promote seeds (implying supply of quality/hybrid seeds).
- Provides Seed Replacement Ratio context and statistics (low certified/hybrid seed use), useful to judge the extent and limits of seed supply despite private activity.
- Indirectly indicates that even with private players present, certified/hybrid seed penetration was limited.
- Explicitly states a demand–supply gap for quality seeds of low-value, high-volume crops.
- Passage is tied to the 2014 exam context referenced in the question source.
- States seeds are available for high-value crops but 'not enough seeds are supplied' for low-value, high-volume crops such as rice and wheat.
- Directly links seed availability shortfall to staple crops relevant for food security and SRR efforts.
- Notes a 'huge demand supply gap' contributing to low seed replacement rates in India.
- Provides quantitative context (only ~15% area planted with fresh quality seeds), underscoring the gap's magnitude for staples like wheat and rice.
Gives the low incidence of certified/hybrid seed use (9.4% certified, 9.8% hybrid) and defines Seed Replacement Ratio, linking SRR to how much area uses certified seed versus farm-saved seed.
A student could combine the low certified-seed share with the large area under low-value, high-volume crops (known from external sources) to infer potential shortfall in formal quality-seed supply for those crops.
Lists seed-sector problems: availability of inappropriate quality seeds, untimely supply and inadequate quantity—directly describing supply-side constraints for quality seed.
A student could apply this pattern to low-value, high-volume crops (which need large, timely seed deliveries) to judge whether these constraints would produce a demand–supply gap.
Raises as a constraint the (claimed) absence of private sector participation in supplying quality seeds of vegetables and planting materials—implying limited suppliers for certain seed types.
A student could check whether low-value, high-volume crops relied on private seed firms in 2014; lack of such participation would suggest weaker supply capacity relative to demand.
Notes poor supply chain linkages, fragmented primary processing, storage and distribution—factors that can impede timely and adequate delivery of quality agricultural inputs including seed.
Combine this with the need for timely seed distribution for large-area crops to infer increased risk of demand–supply mismatches for quality seed of high-volume crops.
Points out small landholdings and low farmer awareness lead to limited standardized, bulk volumes of crop varieties—hindering economies of scale for seed production/supply.
A student could reason that low standardization and fragmented demand make it harder for formal seed suppliers to meet large, uniform demand for low-value, high-volume seeds, suggesting a possible gap.
- [THE VERDICT]: Logical Trap / Moderate. Statement 2 is an 'Extreme Negative' sitter; Statement 1 requires specific policy history awareness.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Agriculture > Inputs > Seed Sector > Constraints & Policy Framework.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize Seed Certification Tags: Breeder (Golden Yellow) → Foundation (White) → Certified (Azure Blue). Study PPV&FR Act 2001 (Farmers' Rights), Seed Village Programme, and the difference between 'Notified' vs 'Non-notified' varieties.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about a sector (Seeds, Fertilizer), always map the 'Market Structure': Who sells? (Private vs Public). What governs them? (Acts/Policies). What are the gaps? (Low margin crops).
SRR is explicitly defined and discussed in the references and is central to efforts to improve seed use for food production.
SRR is a high-yield concept in agriculture questions: know its definition, measurement, significance for productivity, and how it links to policy measures (e.g., seed certification, hybrid adoption). UPSC often tests causes/solutions to low SRR and its impact on food security; prepare by memorizing the definition and common policy levers to raise SRR.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS > p. 299
The legal framework for seed certification (Seeds Act, 1966) and later attempts to amend it are documented in the references, showing how quality-seed supply is regulated.
Understanding statutory frameworks and reform attempts is vital for polity and agriculture mains/ethics answers. Questions may ask about regulatory roles, seed quality assurance, and the significance of proposed amendments; study the Act's provisions, the certification mechanism, and reform timelines to answer such prompts.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS ACT, 1966 > p. 300
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS ACT, 1966 > p. 301
References link developed/quality seeds to higher agricultural output and place seed issues in the context of national food security frameworks.
UPSC often asks integrated questions connecting inputs (seeds) to broader themes like the National Food Security Act and malnutrition. Master this linkage to write balanced answers on supply-side measures for food security; prepare by mapping how seed quality impacts production, availability, and nutrition outcomes.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS > p. 299
- Economics, Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: Food Security in India > The National Food Security Act, 2013 > p. 49
References identify private companies and industrial houses actively producing and promoting seeds, which directly bears on whether private firms supply quality seeds/planting material.
Understanding the private sector's role is high-yield for UPSC questions on agricultural reforms, seed policy, and public–private roles in input delivery. It connects to topics like seed regulation, market structure, and access to quality inputs. Prepare by studying seed-sector stakeholders, market dynamics, and policy debates to answer questions on constraints and reforms.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > Present Challenges in Seeds Sector > p. 300
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 11: Industries > 31. The Pioneer > p. 112
SRR definition and low percentages of certified/hybrid seed use are given and are central to assessing efforts to improve seed replacement and the impact of suppliers.
SRR is a frequently tested metric in agriculture and food-security questions; mastering its meaning, current levels, and implications helps answer policy-evaluation and trend questions. Link this to seed supply, adoption barriers, and productivity outcomes. Learn via definitions, current statistics, and case studies of adoption constraints.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS > p. 299
Horticulture's large share of agricultural output and MIDH focus on quality seeds/planting material highlight the sectoral need that seed suppliers (private or public) must meet.
Questions often probe horticulture's role in nutritional security and input-supply challenges. Knowing horticulture's contribution and institutional responses (e.g., MIDH) aids answers on policy measures, supply-chains, and stakeholder roles. Study horticulture statistics, missions/schemes, and input-supply mechanisms for targeted answers.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > HORTICULTURE SECTOR > p. 297
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > Salient Features > p. 341
SRR is the core metric tied to efforts to improve use of certified/hybrid seeds mentioned in the references.
SRR is a high-yield concept for UPSC as it links seed policy, productivity, and food security; questions often ask about indicators and their policy implications. Master by understanding definition, calculation, current levels, and policy levers to raise SRR.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SEEDS > p. 299
The 'Seed Tag' Hierarchy: Breeder Seed (Golden Yellow Tag) → Foundation Seed (White Tag) → Certified Seed (Azure Blue Tag). UPSC loves asking about these color codes or the sequence of certification.
Apply the 'Capitalism Test' to Statement 2. It claims 'no participation' of the private sector in vegetables/horticulture. Vegetable seeds are high-value/high-margin products. In a post-1991 economy, the private sector *always* dominates high-margin segments. Statement 2 is absurdly false. Eliminate options A and C.
Link Seed Policy to IPR & WTO (GS3): The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001 was India's sui generis response to TRIPS, balancing corporate breeder rights with traditional farmer rights to save/sow seeds.