Question map
There is some concern regarding the nanoparticles of some chemical elements that are used by the industry in the manufacture of various products. Why? 1. They can accumulate in the environment, and contaminate water and soil. 2. They can enter the food chains. 3. They can trigger the production of free radicals. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because all three statements are valid concerns regarding industrial nanoparticles.
Statement 1 is correct: Up to 0.3 Tg of engineered nanomaterials enter landfills, soil, water, and air annually[1], and they may reach aquatic environments via industrial effluents, treated wastewater discharge, or surface runoff from soils affected by erosion, with titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles frequently found in these environmental pathways[2].
Statement 2 is correct: Nanomaterials enter the food chain through multiple pathways, including industrial waste, sewage, and agricultural runoff, and are absorbed by aquatic organisms such as algae and bacteria and then transferred to larger organisms via predation[3].
Statement 3 is correct: Nanoparticles can trigger free radical production. Environmental exposures significantly influence the balance between free radical production and antioxidant capacity[4], and industrial chemicals are known exogenous sources that can generate free radicals. Given their high surface area-to-volume ratio and reactivity[5], nanoparticles can act as catalysts for free radical generation, posing biochemical risks.
Sources- [1] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau8299
- [4] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41420-024-02278-8
- [5] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/soil-science/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1705689/full
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Science-Environment Intersection' question. While specific lines aren't in textbooks, the logic is derived from general pollution principles (persistence, bioaccumulation). It relies heavily on the 'Scientific Plausibility' heuristic—if a new technology *can* theoretically cause an effect, UPSC considers it correct.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products accumulate in the environment?
- Statement 2: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products contaminate water and soil?
- Statement 3: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products enter food chains?
- Statement 4: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products trigger the production of free radicals?
States that industries dispose wastes (including poisonous elements and heavy metals) into rivers, lakes and soil, causing these elements to reach and affect water bodies.
A student could extend this by noting that if bulk elemental wastes reach water/soil, then engineered nanoparticles of those elements released similarly could also be transported and accumulate in the same environmental compartments.
Lists specific elemental pollutants in industrial waste (mercury, lead, copper, zinc, cadmium, etc.), showing industry uses and emits metal elements.
Knowing industries emit elemental metals, one can reasonably suspect industry might also release those elements in nanoparticulate form which could follow analogous accumulation pathways.
Describes inorganic pollutants from chemical plants (chlorides, sulphates, nitrates of metals, suspended particles) and notes landfill/solid wastes pollute surface and groundwater.
Since suspended particles and metal salts enter water/groundwater, a student could infer that particulate forms including nanoparticles may likewise persist and accumulate in sediments and aquifers.
Explains chemical fertilizers and synthetic organic compounds flow into water bodies and can accumulate (e.g., nitrates causing eutrophication), illustrating environmental accumulation of applied chemicals.
By analogy, this pattern of chemical runoff and accumulation supports the possibility that nanoparticulate chemical forms released to land or water might also concentrate and impact ecosystems.
Notes certain industrial by-products (perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride) have long atmospheric lifetimes and are associated with manufacturing processes.
This provides an example of industrial chemicals that persist and travel in the environment, suggesting nanoparticles produced or emitted by similar industries could likewise be persistent and transportable before eventual accumulation.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.