Question map
There is some concern regarding the nanoparticles of some chemical elements that are used by the industry in the manufacture of various products. Why? 1. They can accumulate in the environment, and contaminate water and soil. 2. They can enter the food chains. 3. They can trigger the production of free radicals. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because all three statements are valid concerns regarding industrial nanoparticles.
Statement 1 is correct: Up to 0.3 Tg of engineered nanomaterials enter landfills, soil, water, and air annually[1], and they may reach aquatic environments via industrial effluents, treated wastewater discharge, or surface runoff from soils affected by erosion, with titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles frequently found in these environmental pathways[2].
Statement 2 is correct: Nanomaterials enter the food chain through multiple pathways, including industrial waste, sewage, and agricultural runoff, and are absorbed by aquatic organisms such as algae and bacteria and then transferred to larger organisms via predation[3].
Statement 3 is correct: Nanoparticles can trigger free radical production. Environmental exposures significantly influence the balance between free radical production and antioxidant capacity[4], and industrial chemicals are known exogenous sources that can generate free radicals. Given their high surface area-to-volume ratio and reactivity[5], nanoparticles can act as catalysts for free radical generation, posing biochemical risks.
Sources- [1] https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aau8299
- [4] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41420-024-02278-8
- [5] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/soil-science/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2025.1705689/full
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Science-Environment Intersection' question. While specific lines aren't in textbooks, the logic is derived from general pollution principles (persistence, bioaccumulation). It relies heavily on the 'Scientific Plausibility' heuristic—if a new technology *can* theoretically cause an effect, UPSC considers it correct.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products accumulate in the environment?
- Statement 2: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products contaminate water and soil?
- Statement 3: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products enter food chains?
- Statement 4: Can nanoparticles of chemical elements used by industry in the manufacture of various products trigger the production of free radicals?
States that industries dispose wastes (including poisonous elements and heavy metals) into rivers, lakes and soil, causing these elements to reach and affect water bodies.
A student could extend this by noting that if bulk elemental wastes reach water/soil, then engineered nanoparticles of those elements released similarly could also be transported and accumulate in the same environmental compartments.
Lists specific elemental pollutants in industrial waste (mercury, lead, copper, zinc, cadmium, etc.), showing industry uses and emits metal elements.
Knowing industries emit elemental metals, one can reasonably suspect industry might also release those elements in nanoparticulate form which could follow analogous accumulation pathways.
Describes inorganic pollutants from chemical plants (chlorides, sulphates, nitrates of metals, suspended particles) and notes landfill/solid wastes pollute surface and groundwater.
Since suspended particles and metal salts enter water/groundwater, a student could infer that particulate forms including nanoparticles may likewise persist and accumulate in sediments and aquifers.
Explains chemical fertilizers and synthetic organic compounds flow into water bodies and can accumulate (e.g., nitrates causing eutrophication), illustrating environmental accumulation of applied chemicals.
By analogy, this pattern of chemical runoff and accumulation supports the possibility that nanoparticulate chemical forms released to land or water might also concentrate and impact ecosystems.
Notes certain industrial by-products (perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride) have long atmospheric lifetimes and are associated with manufacturing processes.
This provides an example of industrial chemicals that persist and travel in the environment, suggesting nanoparticles produced or emitted by similar industries could likewise be persistent and transportable before eventual accumulation.
- Explicitly describes pathways by which nanomaterials reach aquatic environments and soils (industrial effluents, treated wastewater, runoff).
- Names commonly studied nanoparticles (titanium dioxide, silver) as being frequently found in these environmental pathways.
- Provides an expert estimate quantifying engineered nanomaterials entering landfills, soil, water, and air annually (up to 0.3 Tg).
- Lists common engineered nanomaterials used in many commercial products, linking industrial use to environmental release.
- States engineered nanoparticles are highly dynamic in aquatic environments and soil-plant systems due to high surface area and reactivity.
- Notes research showing ENPs at sufficient concentrations can harm aquatic organisms, implying environmental presence and impact.
Shows industries release chemical residuals and numerous heavy metals into water bodies and soils via disposal of wastes.
A student could extend this by noting that if industries emit elemental particles (including nanoparticles), the same disposal pathways could carry them into water/soil.
Describes how acidification and other processes increase leaching and mobility of metals (Al, Cd, Pb, Hg) from watersheds into water supplies.
Combine with knowledge that smaller particles/colloids are often more mobile to infer nanoparticles of such elements may also be mobilized under similar conditions.
States that pollutants are deposited in soils and that chemical fertilisers, insecticides and pesticides change soil chemistry and can infiltrate groundwater.
A student could reason that engineered or incidental elemental nanoparticles applied or emitted similarly could be retained in or migrate through soil layers into groundwater.
Identifies synthetic organic compounds and agricultural chemicals as important sources of water pollution through runoff and accumulation.
Using the pattern that industrial/agricultural chemicals reach water via runoff, one could suspect industrial nanoparticles released to land would follow the same transport routes.
Explains that plastics and their additives can leach toxic substances into soil and affect groundwater recharge and soil microbes.
A student could extend this by considering that small-scale particulate forms (including nanoparticles) of industrial additives may likewise leach and interact with soil and water systems.
- Explicitly states that nanomaterials enter the food chain and lists industrial pathways (industrial waste, sewage, agricultural runoff).
- Describes uptake by primary aquatic organisms (algae, bacteria) and transfer to larger organisms via predation, indicating movement through food webs.
- States that nanoplastics have long life and high ingestion rates that enable 'efficient passaging through aquatic food chains'.
- Links environmental presence of nanomaterials to biological impacts through trophic transfer.
- Reports that silver nanoparticles are used within the food industry and in food packaging, indicating a direct source of nanoparticles to the food system.
- Discusses gastrointestinal (GIT) fate and toxicity, implying potential for ingestion and entry into consumer food chains.
States that non‑degradable chemicals enter food chains and bioaccumulate at higher trophic levels (biological magnification) and that pesticide residues persist in food.
A student could infer that persistent industrial nanoparticles (if non‑degradable) might similarly accumulate in organisms and trace them up trophic levels to test entry into food chains.
Describes the chemical industry as a major supplier of raw materials (including heavy and fine chemicals) used across many product lines.
One can extend this to note that widespread industrial use of elemental chemicals increases opportunities for environmental release of related particles (including nanoparticles) that could reach ecosystems and food chains.
Explains that chemical‑based industries use natural chemical minerals and produce products (plastics, synthetic fibres) that pervade many sectors.
A student could reason that elemental forms or engineered forms (e.g., very small particles) derived from such industries could be released during manufacture, use or disposal and become environmental contaminants.
Outlines food manufacturing and value‑addition processes that transform raw agricultural and animal products into edible goods.
One could investigate whether industrial chemicals or particulates present in raw inputs, processing environments, or packaging become incorporated into processed foods and thus enter food chains.
Lists metallurgical and mineral‑extracting industries that handle many metals (copper, tin, aluminium, lead, zinc, chromium, nickel, cobalt, etc.).
A student could focus on whether nanoscale forms of these elemental metals (used in industry) are released to air/soil/water near such industries and then taken up by plants or animals entering local food webs.
Describes how particles (sulphuric acid particles) can liberate reactive atoms (free chlorine) that then participate in further chemical reactions.
A student could generalize that small particles or aerosols can release reactive species and ask whether metal or element nanoparticles similarly release atoms or reactive fragments that form free radicals.
Explains that different metals have differing reactivities with oxygen and that metal surfaces form oxide layers, implying surface chemistry and reactivity vary with element and form.
A student could infer that nanoscale forms (much higher surface area) might alter oxidation behavior and thus influence radical-generating reactions with oxygen.
Notes industries release chemical residuals and heavy metals into the environment, providing context that industrially used elements and their residues are present where radical-generating processes could occur.
Combine this with knowledge of nanoparticle release to consider environmental exposure pathways where nanoparticles could undergo reactions producing radicals.
Lists industrially produced compounds and by-products from manufacturing and semiconductor processes, indicating many reactive chemical species are associated with industry.
Use this to identify specific industrial elements/compounds that, when present as nanoparticles, could participate in surface or redox chemistry leading to radical formation.
Shows examples of redox reactions involving metal oxides and metals (ZnO reduced to Zn), illustrating that metal compounds can undergo reactions that change oxidation states.
A student could extend this to ask whether nanoscale metal oxides more readily undergo redox steps that can produce radical species (e.g., via Fenton-like chemistry).
- [THE VERDICT]: Logical Sitter. While the specific term 'nanoparticle free radicals' isn't in NCERT, the 'Can' wording makes it a high-probability 'All of the above' case.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Emerging Technologies (Nanotech) intersecting with Environmental Pollution (Bioaccumulation/Toxicity).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize parallel emerging pollutants: Microplastics (<5mm, enter blood-brain barrier), PFAS ('Forever Chemicals' in non-stick cookware), Bisphenol A (Endocrine disruptor in plastics), and E-waste heavy metals (Lead, Cadmium, Beryllium).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: In Science & Tech, distinguish between 'Definitive' statements (will, always) and 'Possibility' statements (can, may). For emerging tech risks or applications, 'Can' statements are 95% correct unless they violate basic laws of physics.
Multiple references state that industries discharge heavy metals and poisonous chemical residuals (e.g., mercury, lead, cadmium) that reach water bodies and soils.
High-yield for UPSC environment/geography: questions often ask sources, effects and control of heavy-metal pollution. It links to public health, water contamination and industrial regulation topics. Prepare by memorising common metal pollutants, their industrial sources and ecological/health impacts.
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: Geographical Perspective on Selected Issues and Problems > Water Pollution > p. 96
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.6.2. Source > p. 79
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 6.32 Environment and Ecology > p. 37
Sources describe industrial wastes being disposed into running water, lakes and infiltration of agricultural chemicals into soil and groundwater.
Frequently tested concept in environment and geography papers — helps answer questions on contamination routes, eutrophication and groundwater pollution. Practice by mapping source → pathway → receptor (e.g., factory discharge → river → aquatic ecosystem → human exposure).
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: Geographical Perspective on Selected Issues and Problems > Water Pollution > p. 96
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 2. Water (aquatic) Pollution > p. 36
References enumerate inorganic pollutants (acids, chlorides, sulphates, nitrates, metals) and synthetic organic compounds (solvents, dyes, pesticides) from industries.
Useful for classifying pollution questions and for policy/mitigation answers; links to industrial chemistry, water treatment and ecological impacts. Learn by categorising common pollutants, their industrial origins and typical environmental effects.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 6.32 Environment and Ecology > p. 37
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 2. Water (aquatic) Pollution > p. 36
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.6.2. Source > p. 79
Several references state that industrial wastes and residual chemicals are discharged into rivers, lakes and reservoirs, causing contamination of water bodies.
High-yield UPSC topic in Environment: explains sources of aquatic pollution, links to public health and regulatory policy. Questions often ask about sources, impacts and control measures of water pollution; mastering real examples and mitigation (effluent treatment, laws) helps answer both static and current-affairs questions. Prepare by mapping major industrial sources to their typical pollutants and treatment options.
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: Geographical Perspective on Selected Issues and Problems > Water Pollution > p. 96
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 2. Water (aquatic) Pollution > p. 36
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > DO, BOD, COD > p. 76
References document entry of metals (mercury, cadmium, lead, aluminium) into water/food chains and list specific human diseases (Minamata, itai-itai, lead neurotoxicity).
Frequently tested through case studies and health-impact questions; links environment to human development and public health. Useful for answering questions on toxicology, remediation, and policy (e.g., limits, monitoring). Study notable incidents, health effects, and mitigation (source control, pH effects, treatment).
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.15.6. Trigger Effect of Acid Rain on Pollutants: > p. 105
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > DO, BOD, COD > p. 76
References highlight that chemical fertilisers, pesticides and insecticides infiltrate soils and run off into water bodies, causing eutrophication and altering soil chemistry.
Core topic linking agriculture, environment and sustainable development; often appears in questions on land degradation, groundwater contamination and agri-environment policy. Master nutrient cycles, impacts of overuse, and alternatives (compost, integrated pest management) to frame policy/recommendation answers.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 2. Water (aquatic) Pollution > p. 36
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > 1. Soil Pollution > p. 34
- FUNDAMENTALS OF HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 8: International Trade > Chemical Fertilisers > p. 80
Reference [1] describes non-degradable chemicals accumulating at successive trophic levels, which is the core mechanism by which contaminants in the environment concentrate in food chains.
High-yield UPSC topic: appears in environment and ecology questions about pollution, biomagnification, and human exposure via food. Connects to topics on pesticides, persistent pollutants, and public health. Learn definition, mechanism, examples, and policy implications to answer analytical questions and case studies.
- Science , class X (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 13: Our Environment > 13.1.1 Food Chains and Webs > p. 212
Microplastics vs Nanoplastics. Microplastics are <5mm; Nanoplastics are <100nm (or <1000nm depending on definition) and can penetrate cell membranes. Next logical Q: 'Trophic Cascade' effects of these particles or 'Bio-mining' using microbes.
The 'Possibility Heuristic': The question asks what *can* happen. In the infinite complexity of nature, nanoparticles *can* theoretically do all these things. Unless an option says 'They turn water into gold' (impossible), assume the negative externality is possible. 'Can' + Science = True.
Connects to GS-3 Environment (Pollution) and Ethics (Precautionary Principle). If the effects of Nanotech are unknown but potentially disastrous (free radicals, food chain entry), should we ban it? This is the core debate in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).