Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. Other than those made by humans, nanoparticles do not exist in nature. 2. Nanoparticles of some metallic oxides are used in the manufacture of some cosmetics. 3. Nanoparticles of some commercial products which enter the environment are unsafe for humans. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (2 and 3) because of the following reasons:
- Statement 1 is incorrect: Nanoparticles occur abundantly in nature. They are found in volcanic ash, ocean spray, mineral composites, and are even produced by certain biological processes. Therefore, the claim that they only exist due to human activity is false.
- Statement 2 is correct: Metallic oxide nanoparticles, particularly Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) and Zinc Oxide (ZnO), are widely used in cosmetics like sunscreens and foundations. They are preferred because they provide effective UV protection while remaining transparent on the skin.
- Statement 3 is correct: Due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, nanoparticles can be chemically reactive and penetrate biological membranes. Studies indicate that certain commercial nanoparticles entering the environment can accumulate in the food chain, posing potential toxicological risks to human health.
Since statements 2 and 3 are scientifically accurate while statement 1 is factually wrong, Option 4 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Applied Science' question. While Statement 3 is directly in standard books (Shankar IAS), Statements 1 and 2 require 'Scientific Common Sense' rather than rote memorization. The key was realizing that nature operates at all scales, not just the ones humans invented.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Do naturally occurring nanoparticles exist in nature independent of human manufacturing?
- Statement 2: Are nanoparticles of metallic oxides (for example titanium dioxide or zinc oxide) used in the manufacture of some cosmetics such as sunscreens and makeup?
- Statement 3: Do nanoparticles released from commercial products into the environment pose health risks to humans?
- Explicitly states that human exposure to naturally occurring nanoparticles has been a constant feature of the environment.
- Distinguishes naturally occurring NPs from engineered/anthropogenic sources, implying they exist independent of human manufacturing.
- States that nanomaterials have been present since Earth's origin, indicating their natural occurrence long before human manufacturing.
- Links naturally occurring nanomaterials to the evolution of life, reinforcing their natural, pre-anthropogenic presence.
- Identifies weathering and mineral formation in soils as main producers of Earth's natural nanomaterials.
- Specifically names clays as the most abundant naturally occurring inorganic nanomaterial, showing natural formation processes create NPs.
Says some elements are 'naturally occurring' while others are artificially made, establishing a category distinction between naturally present substances and human-made ones.
A student could combine this with knowledge that elements/compounds can form extremely small particles (e.g., dust, soot, mineral grains) to infer that naturally occurring very-small-scale particles might exist.
Explains atoms combine to form molecules and gives examples of naturally occurring elements and simple molecules, implying natural formation of small-scale particles from atoms.
Using basic chemistry and scale facts (atoms → molecules → clusters), a student could reason that natural processes could produce particulate clusters at nanometer scales.
Defines 'Nature' as life and non-life forms that exist independently of humans and treats materials from nature as resources when used, implying many materials exist without human manufacture.
Combine this with geological and biological knowledge (minerals, volcanic ash, biogenic particles) to suspect naturally formed tiny particles exist independent of humans.
Discusses microparticles (micron-sized plastic beads) being present in the environment and ingested by organisms, illustrating that small particles exist in ecosystems and are relevant at small scales.
A student could note that if micron-scale particles occur and affect organisms, then by analogy and known size ranges, even smaller (nano-scale) particles may also be present naturally (e.g., from biological or geological sources).
Provides a classification 'according to their existence in nature', distinguishing 'qualitative pollutants' that do not occur in nature, which implicitly acknowledges that some pollutants/particles do occur naturally.
Use this rule to reason that since the classification separates man-made from naturally occurring substances, there is a recognized category of naturally occurring particulate matter that could include nanoparticles.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.