Question map
With reference to Rowlatt Satyagraha, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. The Rowlatt Act was based on the recommendations of the 'Sedition Committee'. 2. In Rowlatt Satyagraha, Gandhiji tried to utilize the Home Rule League. 3. Demonstrations against the arrival of Simon Commission coincided with Rowlatt Satyagraha. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (statements 1 and 2 only).
**Statement 1 is correct:** The Rowlatt Act was based on the recommendations made by the Rowlatt Commission, headed by British judge Sir Sidney Rowlatt, to investigate the 'seditious conspiracy' of the Indian people.[1] This commission is also known as the Sedition Committee.
**Statement 2 is correct:** During the Rowlatt Satyagraha, Gandhi organised a Satyagraha Sabha and roped in younger members of Home Rule Leagues and the Pan Islamists.[2] This shows Gandhi actively utilized the Home Rule League networks for the movement.
**Statement 3 is incorrect:** The Rowlatt Satyagraha occurred in 1919, while the Simon Commission arrived in India in 1928[3], nearly a decade later. These two events did not coincide; they were separated by approximately nine years. The Rowlatt Satyagraha was one of Gandhi's early mass movements, whereas the Simon Commission protests came much later in the freedom struggle.
Sources- [1] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > The Rowlatt Act > p. 320
- [2] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Act— First Mass Strike > p. 321
- [3] https://ncert.nic.in/textbook/pdf/jess302.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Timeline + Continuity' question. It tests if you understand the transition of power from Tilak/Besant (Home Rule) to Gandhi, and if you possess a basic chronological map of the freedom struggle (1919 vs 1928). It rewards reading standard texts like Spectrum with attention to 'organizational machinery' rather than just dates.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Rowlatt Act (which led to the Rowlatt Satyagraha) based on the recommendations of the "Sedition Committee" (Rowlatt Committee)?
- Statement 2: Did Mahatma Gandhi attempt to utilize the Home Rule League during the Rowlatt Satyagraha?
- Statement 3: Did demonstrations against the arrival of the Simon Commission coincide with the Rowlatt Satyagraha?
- Explicitly states the Act 'was based on the recommendations' of the Rowlatt Commission chaired by Sir Sidney Rowlatt.
- Notes the commission investigated 'seditious conspiracy' and recommended detention/deportation without trial—measures that the Act enacted.
- States that 'on the recommendation of a committee chaired by Sir Sidney Rowlatt' tough wartime measures were continued, linking the committee's recommendation to the Rowlatt Act.
- Directly connects the committee recommendation to the political response (Gandhi's campaign) against the Rowlatt Act.
- Explicitly states Gandhi 'roped in younger members of Home Rule Leagues' when he organised the Satyagraha Sabha for Rowlatt protests.
- Connects Home Rule League personnel directly to the planning and execution of the Rowlatt Satyagraha.
- Says Home Rule Leagues prepared the ground for Gandhi's satyagraha movements and that many early Gandhian satyagrahis had been League members.
- Indicates Gandhi used the organisational networks created by the Leagues to spread Gandhian methods of agitation.
- Notes Gandhi's Satyagraha Sabha (central to the Rowlatt campaign) as the body that pledged disobedience against the Act.
- Supports the link between Gandhi's Rowlatt movement apparatus and groups (like Home Rule League members) involved in mobilisation.
- Explicitly states the two events coincided.
- Directly ties demonstrations against the Simon Commission to the Rowlatt Satyagraha.
- Gives the date/year for the Rowlatt Satyagraha (1919).
- Establishes timing of the Rowlatt movement, enabling comparison with Simon Commission dates.
- Gives the year the Simon Commission arrived in India (1928).
- Shows the Simon Commission events occurred almost a decade after the Rowlatt Satyagraha.
Describes the Rowlatt Satyagraha as a nationwide satyagraha launched in 1919 with hartals, rallies and strikes — establishing its time and that it produced mass demonstrations.
A student could note the 1919 timing here and compare it with the Simon Commission dates from other snippets to check for overlap.
States that satyagraha was to be launched on April 6, 1919 and that large-scale demonstrations occurred before that — reinforcing the Rowlatt-era protest period.
Use this to fix the Rowlatt protests in 1919 and then compare to when the Simon Commission arrived (from Simon-related snippets).
Gives the appointment date (November 1927) of the Simon Commission and notes it was greeted by widespread protest — providing the Simon Commission time-frame.
Combine this 1927/1928 timing with the 1919 date of Rowlatt Satyagraha to judge whether the events coincided (they appear separated in time).
Specifies the commission landed on February 3, 1928 and that a countrywide hartal and mass rallies were organised on that day — showing the Simon protests were in early 1928.
Compare the explicit 3 Feb 1928 protest date with the 1919 Rowlatt protest period to assess coincidence (chronological mismatch suggests no coincidence).
Notes the Simon Commission arrived in India in 1928 and was greeted with the slogan 'Go back Simon' with all parties participating — showing the character and nationwide nature of Simon protests.
Use this to reinforce that the Simon protests were a distinct, nationwide movement in 1928, which can be compared with the 1919 Rowlatt movement timing.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Statement 3 is a chronological blunder (1919 vs 1928) that eliminates two options immediately. Statements 1 and 2 are direct lines from Spectrum/NCERT.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Emergence of Gandhi' (1915-1920). Specifically, the operational shift from elite constitutional methods to mass Satyagraha.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Rowlatt Trinity': 1. The Official Name (Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act, 1919). 2. The Resignations (Jinnah, Malaviya, Mazhar-ul-Haq resigned from Imperial Legislative Council). 3. The Aftermath (Hunter Committee 1919). Also, note that the Home Rule League was later renamed 'Swarajya Sabha' by Gandhi in 1920.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about a new leader (Gandhi), ask: 'Whose army did he use?' Gandhi didn't build a cadre from scratch overnight; he pivoted the existing Home Rule League networks. Always trace the *human resource* continuity between movements.
The core claim links the Rowlatt Act directly to recommendations by the Rowlatt (Sedition) Committee/Commission chaired by Sir Sidney Rowlatt.
High-yield for questions on colonial legislation and administrative responses to political dissent; helps explain cause-effect between investigative committees and emergency laws. Master through focused revision of committee reports and resulting laws to answer 'origin and motive' style questions.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > The Rowlatt Act > p. 320
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 2. The Making and Unmaking of Non-cooperation > p. 289
References emphasise the committee's recommendation to continue wartime measures like detention without trial and press censorship, which the Rowlatt Act institutionalised.
Important for understanding legal tools of colonial control and their impact on nationalist mobilisation; useful across polity and modern Indian history questions on civil liberties and colonial governance. Revise by linking specific laws to the measures they authorised and the political responses they provoked.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > The Rowlatt Act > p. 320
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 1.2 The Rowlatt Act > p. 31
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 2. The Making and Unmaking of Non-cooperation > p. 289
Multiple references show Gandhi launched a nationwide satyagraha specifically in response to the Rowlatt Act, tying legislative origin to political mobilisation.
Crucial for essay and prelims/CSAT questions on movements: explains how legislation provoked non-cooperation tactics; connects legal history to mass politics. Prepare by mapping laws → reactions → leaders, using timeline-based summaries.
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 1.2 The Rowlatt Act > p. 31
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Act— First Mass Strike > p. 321
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 15: Struggle for Swaraj > Satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act > p. 267
References show Home Rule Leagues created branches/networks and that Gandhi used League members/networks during the Rowlatt Satyagraha.
High-yield for questions on pre-Gandhian political organisations and their role in mass mobilisation; helps link continuity from Home Rule movements to Gandhian satyagraha. Master by mapping organisations, leaders, geographic reach and how Gandhi incorporated existing networks into his campaigns.
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Impact of World War I on Indian Freedom Movement > c) Importance of the Home Rule Movement > p. 34
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 14: Nationalist Movement 1905—1918 > The Home Rule Leagues > p. 257
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Act— First Mass Strike > p. 321
Evidence identifies the Satyagraha Sabha as Gandhi's organising body for the Rowlatt protests and lists tactics (hartal, fasting, civil disobedience) used.
Useful for questions on methods and organisational forms of early Gandhian movements, their evolution and tactical choices; prepares candidates to explain how Gandhi translated organisational links into concrete mass actions. Prepare by memorising timelines, key bodies (e.g., Satyagraha Sabha), and typical tactics.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Act— First Mass Strike > p. 321
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 4: Advent of Gandhi and Mass Mobilisation > a) Rowlatt Act > p. 46
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 15: Struggle for Swaraj > Satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act > p. 267
The references place the Rowlatt Satyagraha in 1919 and the Simon Commission protests in 1928, so understanding their dates clarifies whether they coincided.
Dates and sequence of major movements are frequently tested in UPSC—knowing precise years prevents chronological errors in answers and essays. This concept links to questions on cause–effect (how WWI/Jallianwala influenced 1919 unrest versus late-1920s constitutional debates). Prepare by making a timeline of key events and cross-checking primary actors and outcomes.
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 1.2 The Rowlatt Act > p. 31
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 3 Towards Civil Disobedience > p. 38
Both sets of references describe hartals, rallies and slogans as the primary means of protest in these movements.
Understanding common protest tactics helps answer questions on methods of mass mobilisation and continuity/change across movements. It appears in polity and modern history mains answers and source-based questions. Learn by categorising movements by tactics and citing references/examples.
- India and the Contemporary World – II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 1.2 The Rowlatt Act > p. 31
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 18: Simon Commission and the Nehru Report > Public Response > p. 358
The 'Satyagraha Sabha' was the specific body formed to organize the Rowlatt protest. Key members who signed the pledge included B.G. Horniman, Jamnadas Dwarkadas, and Shankarlal Banker—all prominent Home Rule Leaguers. This proves the organizational overlap.
The 'Decade Jump' Hack. Rowlatt Satyagraha is inextricably linked to Jallianwala Bagh (1919). The Simon Commission is linked to the death of Lala Lajpat Rai (1928). These are two distinct eras of the freedom struggle separated by the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Swarajist lull. They cannot 'coincide'. Eliminate Statement 3 -> Answer derived.
Mains Polity Link: The Rowlatt Act allowed detention without trial for 2 years. Connect this to Article 22 of the Indian Constitution (Protection against arrest and detention) and modern Preventive Detention laws (UAPA/NSA). The Rowlatt Act is the colonial ancestor of the 'State vs. Civil Liberty' debate.