Question map
Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action', often seen in the news, is
Explanation
The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, adopted unanimously by 189 countries, was an agenda for women's empowerment that is now considered the key global policy document on gender equality.[1] It was adopted at a meeting held in Beijing from 4 to 15 September 1995[2], which was the Fourth World Conference on Women[3] convened by the United Nations. As an agenda for action, the Platform seeks to promote and protect the full enjoyment of all human rights and the fundamental freedoms of all women throughout their life cycle.[4]
Options A, B, and D are incorrect as they wrongly attribute the Beijing Declaration to other international organizations (Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Asia-Pacific Economic Forum, and East Asia Summit) and misrepresent its purpose. The document is specifically a UN initiative focused on women's rights and gender equality, not on terrorism, economic growth, or wildlife trafficking.
Sources- [1] https://www.un.org/en/conferences/women/beijing1995
- [2] https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/BDPfA%20E.pdf
- [3] https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/BDPfA%20E.pdf
- [4] https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/BDPfA%20E.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question was driven by the '20th Anniversary' (Beijing+20) in 2015. It exploits the 'City Name Trap'—aspirants hear 'Beijing' and assume China-led blocs like SCO or APEC. Strategy: Track 10/20/25-year anniversaries of major UN summits.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted as an agenda for women's empowerment at the United Nations World Conference on Women in Beijing (1995)?
- Statement 2: Was the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action issued by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a strategy to tackle regional terrorism?
- Statement 3: Was the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action issued by the Asia-Pacific Economic Forum (APEC) as a plan of action for sustainable economic growth in the Asia-Pacific?
- Statement 4: Was the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action issued by the East Asia Summit as a strategy to combat wildlife trafficking?
- Official UN conference document records the conference outcome and adoption.
- Shows the Declaration and Platform for Action were adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, 4–15 September 1995.
- UN web summary explicitly states the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action were adopted by countries at the conference.
- Directly labels the document 'an agenda for women’s empowerment', tying adoption to that role.
- The Platform for Action text describes itself as 'an agenda for action', indicating its intended use to promote women's rights.
- Frames the Platform's purpose as promoting and protecting women's human rights across their life cycle.
Shows that UN world conferences commonly produce named action plans or 'Agendas' (e.g., Agenda 21 from the 1992 UNCED in Rio).
A student can infer it is plausible that a 1995 UN World Conference on Women could likewise have produced a named declaration/platform, and then check conference records or UN archives for a Beijing document.
Reinforces the pattern that major UN conferences (Earth Summit delegates from many nations) frame non‑binding action plans titled as agendas or declarations.
Use this pattern to treat the existence of a 'Beijing Declaration' as plausible and look up the specific 1995 conference outputs to confirm.
States that UN high‑level meetings (e.g., Millennium Summit) produce declarations addressing issues including discrimination against women, indicating the UN uses declarations to address women's rights.
Combine this with knowledge that there was a 1995 World Conference on Women to reason that the UN likely produced a declaration/platform on women's empowerment at that conference, then verify with UN documents.
Shows the UN adopts universal goals (SDGs) that explicitly include ending discrimination against women, illustrating an ongoing UN practice of formal instruments addressing women's empowerment.
A student can link the UN's history of issuing formal, titled instruments on social issues to expect a dedicated 1995 instrument on women and seek the specific Beijing text.
Describes national institutional mechanisms (National Commission for Women) and government policy focus on women's development, reflecting broader global institutional attention to women's empowerment.
This domestic-level emphasis suggests international conferences (like a UN World Conference on Women) are plausible venues for adopting frameworks that countries then implement; thus check if such a framework (Beijing Declaration/Platform for Action) dates to 1995.
- Explicitly states the instrument was adopted by the Fourth World Conference on Women (a UN conference), not by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
- Shows the document was recommended to the UN General Assembly, indicating UN origin and endorsement.
- Document header identifies it as a United Nations publication (© United Nations 1995), confirming UN authorship.
- Table of contents and chapters focus on women's issues (education, poverty, empowerment), not on regional terrorism or SCO strategies.
Shows regional organisations (SAARC) explicitly include 'anti-terrorism' among their cooperative remit, indicating that regional bodies often adopt formal measures/agreements to tackle terrorism.
A student could check whether the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (another regional body) likewise frames terrorism in formal declarations like a 'Beijing Declaration'.
Discusses proposals by regional actors (including China) to 'set up a security mechanism' to address ethnic insurgencies and terrorism linked to cross-border projects.
Use this pattern to expect that China-linked regional fora may produce declarations/platforms aimed at security and counter‑terrorism, and then look for SCO texts titled 'Beijing Declaration' or 'Platform for Action'.
Identifies Chinese strategic concerns (CPEC, Xinjiang, Uighur population) that motivate Beijing to seek regional routes and security — implying China has incentives to support regional counter‑terrorism initiatives.
Combine this motive with the knowledge that China hosts/initiates regional organisations (e.g., SCO) to hypothesize that Beijing‑based declarations could address terrorism.
Notes increasing bilateral and multilateral engagement (visits, cooperation) between China and neighbours, a pattern that often produces joint statements or coordinated policies.
A student could infer that such diplomatic interaction makes it plausible for China‑centered regional organisations to issue coordinated strategies, then search SCO records for a Beijing Declaration on terrorism.
- Identifies the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action as adopted by the Fourth World Conference on Women (a UN conference), not by APEC.
- Shows the document is a global women’s rights/development platform rather than an APEC economic growth plan.
- States ESCAP (a UN regional commission) leads Asia-Pacific regional reviews of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, linking it to UN/ESCAP processes rather than APEC.
- Frames the Platform as a gender-equality/empowerment instrument, not an APEC sustainable economic growth plan.
Defines APEC as a regional economic forum (21 Pacific Rim countries) whose stated aims are inclusive growth, greater prosperity and free trade.
A student could compare the typical outputs of APEC (economic/ trade declarations, leaders' statements) with the title 'Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action' to see if the wording matches APEC's usual remit.
Describes the 1992 Earth Summit producing an 'action plan' called Agenda 21 and labels outcome documents as 'declarations' and 'action plans' in the sustainable development context.
Use the pattern that large UN environmental/sustainable-development conferences produce 'declarations' and 'platforms for action' to test whether the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action might more likely be a UN/conference product than an APEC product.
Reiterates that UN conferences (Earth Summit/UNCED) issue an action plan called Agenda 21 and outcome documents titled as declarations/platforms.
Combine with knowledge of which international bodies conventionally issue 'Platform for Action' documents (UN conferences) to judge whether APEC is the likely issuer.
States Asian Development Bank (ADB) has objectives including eradication of poverty and sustainable development and issues publications/action through development institutions rather than regional forums alone.
A student could contrast the roles of multilateral development banks (ADB) and regional forums (APEC) to assess which types of institutions commonly produce formal 'platforms for action' on sustainability.
Notes the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was founded (Beijing-headquartered) to finance sustainable projects — shows 'Beijing' is associated with institutions that deal with Asia-Pacific development.
Use a map or list of organizations headquartered in Beijing and their typical outputs to see if a 'Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action' is more plausibly linked to a Beijing-based development institution than to APEC.
- Identifies the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action as adopted by the Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing, 4–15 September 1995), a UN event—not the East Asia Summit.
- Shows the document is a UN conference outcome recommended to the UN General Assembly, not a strategy on wildlife trafficking.
- Describes the Declaration and Platform for Action in the context of gender equality and women's empowerment implementation in Asia-Pacific.
- Treats the Platform as a guiding document for gender equality and the 2030 Agenda, with no mention of the East Asia Summit or wildlife trafficking.
Shows precedent that international summits (e.g., the 1992 Earth Summit) issue high‑level outcome documents and action plans (Agenda 21) as strategies for environmental problems.
A student could infer that if the East Asia Summit followed similar practice, it might issue a declaration/plan — so they should check East Asia Summit records for a 'Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action'.
Lists major international instruments and organizations (CITES, TRAFFIC, CBD) that are typically used to address wildlife trade, indicating specialised conventions rather than a generic summit as usual vehicles for combating trafficking.
A student could compare which bodies normally produce anti‑trafficking strategies (CITES, TRAFFIC) versus which summits (e.g., East Asia Summit) issue political declarations, to judge plausibility of the claimed document and issuer.
Describes the Coalition Against Wildlife Trafficking (CAWT), a targeted multilateral initiative created to focus resources on ending illegal wildlife trade, illustrating that specialised coalitions produce strategic actions on trafficking.
A student could use this pattern to assess whether a strategy called 'Platform for Action' is more likely from a specialised coalition or from a regional political summit like the East Asia Summit.
Describes regional ministerial/tiger conservation conferences in Asia that explicitly 'strengthen cooperation to combat wildlife crime', showing regional fora in Asia do adopt joint documents/commitments on wildlife crime.
A student could infer the East Asia region does convene meetings that produce anti‑wildlife‑crime commitments and should therefore check whether the East Asia Summit produced a Beijing document on this topic.
Explains that South Asia established SAWEN (a regional statute/network) to control transboundary wildlife crime, showing regional networks produce formal instruments addressing trafficking rather than every summit.
A student could contrast the roles of regional networks (SAWEN) versus summits (East Asia Summit) to determine which is the likely source of an enforcement strategy titled 'Platform for Action'.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter for current affairs readers; Trap for static guessers. The 'Beijing+20' review was a major headline in 2015.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Major UN Conferences of the 1990s (The 'Decade of Conferences').
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'City-Theme' pairs: Rio 1992 (Environment), Vienna 1993 (Human Rights), Cairo 1994 (Population), Copenhagen 1995 (Social Dev), Istanbul 1996 (Habitat/Housing).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not associate a declaration's city solely with the host country's geopolitics (e.g., Beijing ≠ SCO). Treat the city as a neutral venue for Global/UN consensus.
The statement asks about a UN conference outcome (the Beijing Declaration/Platform). The references show other UN outcomes such as Agenda 21 and the Millennium Declaration, illustrating that major UN conferences produce named outcomes.
UPSC frequently asks candidates to match international conferences with their outcomes. Mastering the types and names of outcomes (e.g., Agenda 21, Millennium Declaration) helps correctly attribute actions to the right conference and year. Study by making a table of major UN conferences and their declared documents/outcomes.
- NCERT. (2022). Contemporary India II: Textbook in Geography for Class X (Revised ed.). NCERT. > Chapter 1: The Rise of Nationalism in Europe > Agenda 21 > p. 4
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > MILLENNIUM SUMMIT AND THE UNITED NATIONS MILLENNIUM DECLARATION > p. 597
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 5: Biodiversity and Legislations > Earth SummIt. > p. 5
The Millennium Declaration reference notes eradication of discrimination against women, and the National Commission for Women reference shows domestic institutional responses—both are relevant when evaluating international women's empowerment commitments like Beijing.
Questions often connect international declarations to national institutions and policy responses. Understanding which global declarations address women's rights and how countries institutionalize follow-up (e.g., commissions, ministries) is high-yield for polity and international relations topics. Prepare by linking major global commitments to corresponding domestic bodies and policies.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > MILLENNIUM SUMMIT AND THE UNITED NATIONS MILLENNIUM DECLARATION > p. 597
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 59: National Commission for Women > ESTABLISHMENT > p. 480
References describe the Rio Earth Summit and Agenda 21 as a named action plan resulting from a UN conference, offering a template for how UN conferences adopt agendas and declarations.
Differentiating conferences by theme (environment vs. social/women's issues) and their resultant documents helps avoid misattribution (e.g., confusing Rio outcomes with Beijing outcomes). UPSC often tests knowledge of specific conference outcomes; focus on memorizing key conferences, themes, and declared documents.
- NCERT. (2022). Contemporary India II: Textbook in Geography for Class X (Revised ed.). NCERT. > Chapter 1: The Rise of Nationalism in Europe > Agenda 21 > p. 4
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 5: Biodiversity and Legislations > Earth SummIt. > p. 5
Reference [7] explicitly cites SAARC's mandate including anti‑terrorism cooperation, which is directly relevant to questions about regional organizations and counterterrorism strategies.
High‑yield for UPSC: understanding SAARC's stated objectives helps distinguish which regional bodies prioritize terrorism. It links to India’s neighbourhood policy and multilateral security forums. Prepares aspirants to answer comparative questions on which organizations address terrorism and how regional tensions affect cooperation; revise SAARC membership, core issues, and limitations.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > GEOPOLITICS OF SOUTH ASIA > p. 60
Reference [5] links projects like the Kolkata–Kunming corridor to risks from insurgencies, terrorism and suggests proposals for security mechanisms among neighbouring states.
Useful for UPSC mains/GS papers: shows how development projects create security externalities, requiring institutional/strategic responses. Connects geography, internal security and foreign policy topics. Study case examples and state responses to frame answers on trade‑security tradeoffs and cross‑border cooperation.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Kolkata-Kunming Corridor-A Proposed Highway > p. 81
Reference [3] describes CPEC's strategic motives and mentions Xinjiang and Uighurs, highlighting security and strategic dimensions of China’s regional initiatives.
Important for UPSC: links infrastructure diplomacy to strategic competition and security (terrorism, insurgency, minority unrest). Helps answer questions on China’s regional footprint, geostrategy, and how economic corridors have security consequences; study CPEC motives, routes, and regional responses.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > China Pakistan Economic Corridor > p. 83
The statement names APEC as the issuer; reference [1] describes what APEC is, its aims (inclusive growth, prosperity, free trade), founding year and membership.
Understanding APEC's nature and mandate helps distinguish which regional bodies produce economic policy documents versus which produce social or UN declarations. UPSC often asks to match organisations with their objectives, membership and headquarters — mastering APEC avoids misattribution. Prepare by memorising key regional forums, founding years, objectives and HQs and practising comparison-based questions.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) > p. 550
The 'Istanbul Convention' (Council of Europe) is the sibling fact often confused here—it deals specifically with 'Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence', whereas the 'Istanbul Declaration' (UN Habitat) deals with human settlements.
Linguistic Forensics: 'Platform for Action' is classic UN development jargon (similar to 'Agenda 21' or 'Sustainable Development Goals'). Security blocs like SCO use terms like 'Convention on Terrorism' or 'Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure'. Trade blocs like APEC use 'Leaders' Declaration' or 'Free Trade Goals'. 'Action/Empowerment' = UN Social/Human Rights body.
Mains GS1 (Society) & GS2 (Social Justice): The Beijing Platform defined '12 Critical Areas of Concern' (e.g., Women & Poverty, Violence, Power). Use these 12 headings as a checklist to structure any Mains answer on Women's Empowerment.