Question map
With reference to Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC), consider the following statements : 1. It was established very recently in response to incidents of piracy and accidents of oil spills. 2. It is an alliance meant for maritime security only. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Neither statement is correct.
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The IOR-ARC (now IORA) was established[1] in March 1997[2], which is not "very recent" in the context of a 2015 question, and there is no evidence it was created specifically in response to piracy or oil spills. The concept was for socio-economic cooperation and other peaceful endeavours[3].
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC) is aimed at economic rather than security cooperation[4]. It is the only pan Indian Ocean economic grouping, though in recent times it has begun to address maritime security issues[5]. This clearly shows it is not "meant for maritime security only" but is primarily an economic organization that has expanded to include some security concerns.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D - Neither 1 nor 2.
Sources- [1] https://www.orfonline.org/research/india-africa-maritime-cooperation-the-case-of-western-indian-ocean
- [2] https://www.orfonline.org/research/towards-a-cohesive-maritime-security-architecture-in-the-indian-ocean
- [3] https://jurnalmaritim.tnial.mil.id/index.php/IMJ/article/download/80/59
- [4] https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/Geopolitics%20and%20Maritime%20Security%20in%20the%20Indian%20Ocean.pdf
- [5] https://www.ipcs.org/issue_briefs/issue_brief_pdf/1501-IPCSAnnual.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question punishes 'headline readers' who saw IORA discussing piracy in news but missed its 1997 economic birth certificate. The trap is conflating a body's *current agenda* (anti-piracy) with its *founding purpose* (economic). Always separate 'Why it was born' from 'What it does now'.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: When was the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC) established?
- Statement 2: Was the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC) established in response to piracy incidents and oil spills?
- Statement 3: Is the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC) solely an alliance for maritime security?
- Directly states the organisation and gives an exact establishment date (month and year).
- Names IOR-ARC and explicitly ties it to the March 1997 founding.
- Confirms the year of creation for IORA/IOR-ARC as 1997.
- Supports the establishment year given in the primary supporting passage.
Notes an early pattern of Indian Ocean littoral states' meetings (first Heads conference in Cairo, 1964) and subsequent diplomatic framing (NAM calling the Ocean a 'zone of peace' in 1970).
A student can use this chronology to see that formal cooperation evolved from conferences in the 1960s–70s to later institutional bodies, and thus look for a formal organization date later than these milestones.
Gives the scope of the Indian Ocean region (47 littoral, 7 island, 13 landlocked countries) and emphasizes littoral states' desire for regional cooperation and a 'zone of peace'.
Knowing the large set of stakeholders, a student could infer the need for a formal multilateral body and search for when such a broad regional association was institutionalized.
Describes post-2004 cooperative technical initiatives in the Indian Ocean (DOARS, 2007 tsunami early warning centre), showing a pattern of issue-driven regional institutionalization after crises.
A student might compare such post-crisis institution-building dates with earlier organizational founding dates to judge whether IOR-ARC likely predates or follows these technical/regional initiatives.
Highlights India's long-term economic/technical cooperation programmes with littoral states, indicating sustained bilateral and regional engagement over decades.
A student could use this to expect that a multilateral institutional form (like IOR-ARC) emerged as these cooperation patterns matured, and thus seek its founding date within the timeline of growing regional programmes.
Provides an example pattern: regional Pacific Rim institutions (APEC) were formally established in specific years (APEC in 1989), illustrating that regional forums commonly have clear founding dates in the late 20th century.
A student can analogize and check late-20th-century founding dates for Indian Ocean regional bodies (e.g., searching records around the 1980s–1990s) to test the statement about IOR-ARC's establishment.
- States the initiative was started by Nelson Mandela and framed around socio-economic cooperation, indicating economic rather than incident-driven origins.
- Implies the association was formed for peaceful and cooperative economic purposes, not as a reactive measure to piracy or oil spills.
- Explicitly describes IOR-ARC as aimed at economic rather than security cooperation, directly contradicting the idea it was created in response to maritime incidents.
- Positions maritime security forums (e.g., IONS) as the relevant responses to security threats, not IOR-ARC.
- Notes IOR-ARC (IORA) is a pan-Indian Ocean economic grouping and 'in recent times it has begun to address maritime security issues', implying security was not the original motive.
- Supports that addressing piracy/oil spills came later, not as the founding purpose.
Explicitly names the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Co-operation as an actor that 'can foster regional economic and technical cooperation' in the context of piracy discussion.
A student could infer that if IOR-ARC is described alongside anti-piracy cooperation, one should check its founding documents or timeline to see if piracy was a motivating concern.
States that piracy in the Indian Ocean 'has given a new significance to the geopolitics' and documents recent pirate attacks, implying piracy is a regional security driver.
Combine this with the IOR-ARC being a regional body to assess whether rising piracy around the time of IOR-ARC's founding could have been a catalyst.
Discusses oil spills' variable and serious environmental impacts, showing oil pollution is a notable marine problem requiring regional management.
Knowing oil spills affect littoral states, a student could compare the timing of major spills with the IOR-ARC founding to see if environmental incidents prompted regional cooperation.
Emphasises the Indian Ocean's role as a major sea route carrying heavy petroleum traffic, highlighting regional vulnerability to oil-related incidents.
Use this to reason that protection of shipping and oil routes is a plausible motive for regional institutions; check whether IOR-ARC's agenda includes maritime security or oil-spill response.
Notes littoral states' concern about political stability and desire for the Indian Ocean to remain a 'zone of peace', indicating broad regional incentives for cooperative bodies.
A student could extend this by investigating whether IOR-ARC was framed as part of efforts to ensure stability from threats like piracy and pollution.
- Explicitly names the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Co-operation and states it can foster regional economic and technical cooperation.
- Mentions piracy as a maritime issue but links the Association to broader regional cooperation, not only security.
- Describes India's significant economic and technical cooperation programmes with littoral states of the Indian Ocean.
- Shows institutional focus on technical training, consultancy and economic ties beyond purely military/security roles.
- Argues for bringing more economic cooperation among littoral states and for a regional organisation (Indian Ocean Community) to achieve that.
- Implies regional bodies are intended to address economic development and avoid external exploitation, not only maritime security.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap Question + Majid Husain (Ch 16). It baits you with the 'Piracy' buzzword (hot in 2011-2014) to mislabel an older economic body.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Indian Ocean Geopolitics & Regional Groupings (IORA vs IONS vs BIMSTEC).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Bio-data' of key ocean bodies: IORA (1997, Economic/Development), IONS (2008, Naval/Security), BIMSTEC (1997, Multi-sectoral), Indian Ocean Commission (1982, Island states). Know the 6 priority areas of IORA (e.g., Blue Economy, Disaster Risk).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Decode the name. 'Association for Regional Cooperation' usually implies broad economic/technical ties (like SAARC). 'Alliance' implies military/security (like NATO). Do not let a specific news event (piracy) redefine the static nature of the organization.
IOR-ARC is a cooperative forum among Indian Ocean littoral states; the references record early multilateral activity (e.g., first heads conference 1964) and the composition/concerns of littoral states.
UPSC often asks about regional groupings and their historical origins. Understanding the chronology of Indian Ocean cooperation (early conferences, evolving bodies) helps answer questions on institutional evolution, regional security and diplomacy. Prepare by mapping key conferences, member-types (littoral/island/landlocked) and their objectives from syllabus readings.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Response of the Bordering Countries > p. 73
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Response of the Bordering Countries > p. 72
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > India and the Geopolitics of the Indian Ocean > p. 78
The question asks an establishment date; references supply establishment years for other regional bodies (e.g., SAARC 1985, APEC 1989), illustrating the kind of factual timeline knowledge required.
Memorising establishment years of major regional bodies is high-yield for static GK and polity/IR questions in UPSC. It connects to comparative questions (which came first, institutional evolution) and helps eliminate distractors in MCQs. Use concise timelines/flashcards linking organisation, year, and core purpose for revision.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > GEOPOLITICS OF SOUTH ASIA > p. 60
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Contemporary South Asia > Peace and Cooperation > p. 42
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) > p. 550
IOR-ARC is a regional cooperation mechanism; references highlight common objectives of regional bodies (economic/technical cooperation, zone-of-peace concerns, training/assistance).
Questions often probe functions and objectives of regional organisations rather than just dates. Mastering common modalities (economic cooperation, technical assistance, security dialogues) enables answers on mandate, success/failure and India's role. Study by comparing mandates across organisations and noting recurring themes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > India and the Geopolitics of the Indian Ocean > p. 78
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Response of the Bordering Countries > p. 72
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Contemporary South Asia > Peace and Cooperation > p. 42
References describe rising piracy in the Indian Ocean and link the need for regional cooperation to address it, which is conceptually close to asking whether regional bodies were formed in response to piracy.
High-yield for UPSC sections on maritime security and geopolitics; it connects to India's naval strategy, regional institutions, and international law. Questions often ask causes, consequences and institutional responses to piracy — prepare by studying incident patterns, affected littoral states, and policy measures.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Issue of Piracy > p. 78
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Fig. 16.16 Pirate Attacks in Indian Ocean > p. 80
References note conferences of littoral states and appeals to identify the Indian Ocean as a 'zone of peace', linking regional diplomacy and institutional responses among coastal states.
Relevant for UPSC topics on regionalism, Non-Aligned Movement history, and diplomatic initiatives in the Indian Ocean; helps answer questions about origins and aims of regional groupings. Study timelines of conferences, resolutions, and major institutional outcomes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Response of the Bordering Countries > p. 73
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Response of the Bordering Countries > p. 72
An explicit reference describes consequences of oil spills and sensitivity of marine communities, which frames environmental drivers for regional cooperation in the maritime realm.
Important for environment and ecology portions of UPSC: links pollution impacts to policy responses, coastal management, and international environmental cooperation. Prepare by understanding oil spill impacts, affected habitats, and mitigation/response mechanisms.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > Oil-Pollution > p. 25
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > 3. Minerals > p. 67
Reference [1] directly attributes economic and technical cooperation roles to the IOR-ARC, showing it is not solely a maritime-security alliance.
Regional organisations frequently appear in UPSC questions; understanding that bodies like IOR-ARC pursue economic, technical and political cooperation (not just security) helps answer questions on region-building, maritime policy and diplomatic strategy. Study official mandates, priority areas and examples of programmes; connect to India's bilateral outreach in the Indian Ocean.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > Fig. 16.16 Pirate Attacks in Indian Ocean > p. 80
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > India and the Geopolitics of the Indian Ocean > p. 78
The 'Indian Ocean Naval Symposium' (IONS), launched by India in 2008. This is the actual body focused purely on naval cooperation and security, often confused with IORA. Also, watch for the 'Blue Economy' declaration (2014) adopted by IORA.
Linguistic Hack: Statement 2 uses 'Alliance' and 'only'. 'Alliance' is a military term (NATO); IOR-ARC has 'Cooperation' in its name, which is diplomatic code for Trade/Economy. A 'Cooperation' body is almost never a 'Security Alliance only'. Also, 'very recently' in Statement 1 is a red flag; 1997 was 18 years prior to the exam.
Connects to GS-2 (Groupings involving India) and GS-3 (Security - Role of external state/non-state actors). IORA is a key pillar of India's SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) doctrine, balancing China's String of Pearls.