Question map
There is a Parliamentary System of Government in India because the
Explanation
The defining feature of a Parliamentary System of Government is the principle of collective responsibility of the executive to the legislature. The fundamental principle underlying the working of parliamentary system of government is the principle of collective responsibility. Article 75 clearly states that the council of ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.[1] The principle of collective responsibility implies that the Lok Sabha can remove the ministry (i.e., council of ministers headed by the Prime Minister) from office by passing a vote of no confidence.[2]
While options A, B, and C are factually correct statements about India's political system, they do not define the parliamentary system. The Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha and not Rajya Sabha.[3] This accountability of the executive (Council of Ministers) to the directly elected house (Lok Sabha) is the cornerstone that distinguishes a parliamentary system from a presidential system, where the executive is separately elected and not removable by the legislature through a no-confidence vote.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 21: Central Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 215
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > DEMERITS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM > p. 133
- [3] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Special Powers of Rajya Sabha > p. 110
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Best Answer' trap. All four options are factually true statements about the Indian polity, but only [D] defines the *system* itself. This requires conceptual clarity from NCERT Class XI (Constitution at Work) rather than just rote memorization of articles.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are members of the Lok Sabha in India's parliamentary system elected directly by the people?
- Statement 2: Can the Parliament of India amend the Constitution of India?
- Statement 3: Is the Rajya Sabha in India's Parliament a permanent house that cannot be dissolved?
- Statement 4: Is the Council of Ministers in India's parliamentary system responsible to the Lok Sabha?
- Explicitly states that the people of India choose their representatives for the Lok Sabha through a direct election.
- Contrasts Lok Sabha (direct election) with Rajya Sabha (indirect election), reinforcing the direct nature for Lok Sabha.
- Says representatives of states in the Lok Sabha are directly elected by the people from territorial constituencies.
- Mentions universal adult franchise and eligibility to vote, linking voter participation to Lok Sabha elections.
- States that the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies are directly elected by the people.
- Explains division into territorial constituencies and one representative elected from each, supporting direct election.
- Explicitly cites Article 368 and states Parliament 'may, in exercise of its constituent power, amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of the Constitution.'
- Frames amendment as a parliamentary power (constituent power) rather than ordinary legislative power.
- States Parliament is 'vested with the powers to amend the Constitution by way of addition, variation or repeal of any provision.'
- Specifies majority requirements for amendments (special majority, simple majority, and cases requiring state consent), showing scope and limits of parliamentary amendment power.
- Describes the two methods under Article 368: (a) amendment by special majority of both Houses and (b) special majority plus consent of half the State legislatures.
- Provides procedural detail reinforcing that Parliament (with or without state consent) effects constitutional amendments under Article 368.
- Explicitly states Rajya Sabha is never fully dissolved and is called the 'permanent House'.
- Explains practical consequence: it can meet and conduct urgent business even when Lok Sabha is dissolved.
- Describes Rajya Sabha as a 'continuing chamber' and a 'permanent body not subject to dissolution'.
- Provides supporting detail on replacement mechanism (one-third retirements) that explains continuity.
- Concise statement: 'Rajya Sabha, being a permanent House, is not subject to dissolution.'
- Located in a standard polity text (Laxmikanth), reinforcing the constitutional interpretation.
- Explicitly states Article 75: the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.
- Defines collective responsibility as joint accountability of all ministers to the Lok Sabha ('swim or sink together').
- Affirms collective responsibility as the bedrock of parliamentary government and names Lok Sabha in particular (Article 75).
- Links collective responsibility to the Lok Sabha's power to remove the ministry via a no-confidence motion.
- States directly that the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha and not the Rajya Sabha.
- Explains constitutional reasoning why Rajya Sabha cannot remove the government, reinforcing Lok Sabha's exclusive responsibility role.
- [THE VERDICT]: Absolute Sitter. Direct conceptual lift from Laxmikanth Chapter 12 (Parliamentary System) or NCERT Class XI Chapter 4 (Executive).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Classification of Governments. The core distinction between Parliamentary and Presidential systems lies in the relationship between the Executive and the Legislature.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Westminster' features: 1. Dual Executive (Head of State vs Head of Govt), 2. Majority Party Rule, 3. Collective Responsibility (Art 75), 4. Political Homogeneity, 5. Double Membership (Ministers are MPs), 6. Dissolution of Lower House.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When UPSC asks 'Why is X called Y?', look for the functional definition, not just a structural feature. Direct elections (Option A) happen in Presidential systems (USA) too, so that cannot be the defining reason for a Parliamentary system.
The question asks whether Lok Sabha members are directly elected; multiple references state direct elections and reference universal adult suffrage.
High-yield for UPSC polity: understanding who elects representatives is foundational for questions on democratic legitimacy, voter rights, and electoral reforms. Links to topics on franchise, electoral participation, and constitutional provisions; revise NCERT and Laxmikanth summaries and practice factual recall and application questions.
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 6: The Parliamentary System: Legislature and Executive > LET'S REMEMBER > p. 142
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Composition of Lok Sabha > p. 223
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Lok Sabha > p. 106
References contrast Lok Sabha's direct elections with Rajya Sabha's indirect election by an electoral college.
Frequently tested distinction in polity papers and prelims; helps answer questions on powers, representation, and bicameralism. Study comparative features, election methods, and consequences for legislative powers; use source comparisons (NCERT vs Laxmikanth) for clarity.
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 6: The Parliamentary System: Legislature and Executive > LET'S REMEMBER > p. 142
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Special Powers of Rajya Sabha > p. 110
Supports how Lok Sabha members are chosen: single-member territorial constituencies and FPTP electoral rule are stated in the references.
Important for questions on electoral systems, representation quality, and reform debates. Understand mechanics, advantages/disadvantages, and implications (e.g., single-member constituencies, plurality winners); compare with proportional representation when answering normative/analytical questions.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > First-Past-The-Post System > p. 225
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Composition of Lok Sabha > p. 223
Multiple references (notably [2] and [8]) centre the amendment power in Article 368, showing Parliament exercises constituent power to alter the Constitution.
High-yield: Article 368 is frequently tested in questions on amendment procedure and constitutional law. Understanding its text and scope connects to topics like federalism, fundamental rights and judicial review. Prepare by memorising the two methods under Art. 368, its scope, and landmark cases that interpret it.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 11: Amendment of the Constitution > Amendment of the Constitution > p. 123
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: CONSTITUTION AS A LIVING DOCUMENT > Article 368: > p. 201
References ([4], [8]) enumerate the types of majorities required and when state legislatures' consent is necessary.
Essential for UPSC: questions often ask which provisions need special majorities or state consent. This links to Parliament vs. State powers and federal structure. Learn by categorising amendment types, the exact majority thresholds, and examples of provisions requiring state ratification.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > III Const ituent Powers and Functions > p. 258
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: CONSTITUTION AS A LIVING DOCUMENT > Article 368: > p. 201
Evidence ([7], [6]) records the Kesavananda Bharati outcome and that 'basic features' cannot be altered by Parliament despite Article 368.
Crucial doctrinal concept: the Basic Structure Doctrine is a recurrent UPSC topic connecting amendment power, judicial review, and fundamental rights. Master by studying the doctrine's origin, core elements, and its implications for parliamentary sovereignty and constitutional amendments.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION > Chapter 2: Rights in the Indian Constitution > p. 47
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > Exceptions to Funda· mental Rights. > p. 96
All selected references explicitly label the Rajya Sabha as a permanent/continuing chamber not subject to dissolution.
High-yield for polity questions comparing Houses of Parliament; frequently tested in MCQs and mains questions on structure and functions. Connects to constitutional design and stability of legislature. Memorise the terminology ('continuing chamber'/'permanent') and where it contrasts with Lok Sabha.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > WHY DO WE NEED TWO HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT? > p. 106
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Duration of Rajya Sabha > p. 225
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Dissolution > p. 236
Since they asked about Collective Responsibility (Art 75(3)), the logical sibling is Individual Responsibility (Art 75(2)). Ministers hold office during the 'pleasure of the President', not the Prime Minister (though PM advises it).
Use the 'Relationship Test'. A 'System of Government' describes how the organs (Legislature, Executive, Judiciary) interact. Options A, B, and C describe the organs in isolation (Lok Sabha's election, Parliament's power, Rajya Sabha's tenure). Only Option D describes an interaction/relationship between two organs.
Mains GS-2 (Separation of Powers): The Parliamentary system represents a 'Fusion of Powers' (Executive sits inside Legislature), unlike the US Presidential system which has strict 'Separation of Powers'. This fusion is why the Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule) is crucial for stability.