Question map
Which of the following best describes/describe the aim of 'Green India Mission' of the Government of India? 1. Incorporating environmental benefits and costs into the Union and State Budgets thereby implementing the 'green accounting' 2. Launching the second green revolution to enhance agricultural output so as to ensure food security to one and all in the future 3. Restoring and enhancing forest cover and responding to climate change by a combination of adaptation and mitigation measures Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The Green India Mission aims at protecting, restoring and enhancing India's forest and tree cover and responding to climate change through a combination of adaptation and mitigation[2] measures[1] that help enhance carbon sinks. The mission recognizes the influences and potential that forests and other natural ecosystems have on climate adaptation/mitigation, and on food, water, environmental and livelihood security[3].
Statement 1 is incorrect as green accounting is not part of the Green India Mission's aims, though it may be relevant to broader environmental governance. Statement 2 is incorrect because the mission is not about launching a second green revolution for agricultural output; rather, it focuses specifically on forest conservation and ecosystem restoration. Therefore, only statement 3 accurately describes the aim of the Green India Mission, making option C the correct answer.
Sources- [1] https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2017/08/Revised%20Mission%20Document.pdf
- [2] https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2017/08/Revised%20Mission%20Document.pdf
- [3] https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2017/08/Revised%20Mission%20Document.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Definition Swap' trap where the examiner conflates 'Green Revolution' (Agriculture) with 'Green India' (Forestry). The strategy is to strictly map keywords in scheme titles to their nodal Ministries—Agriculture vs. Environment.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Green India Mission of the Government of India include incorporating environmental benefits and costs into Union and State budgets (green accounting) as one of its aims?
- Statement 2: Does the Green India Mission of the Government of India include launching a "second green revolution" to enhance agricultural output and ensure future food security as one of its aims?
- Statement 3: Does the Green India Mission of the Government of India include restoring and enhancing forest cover and responding to climate change through a combination of adaptation and mitigation measures as one of its aims?
- The paper explicitly lists as its objective to appraise Green Accounting as an integral part of the "Green India" campaign.
- The study draws on reports including the National Mission for a Green India, linking green accounting analysis to the Mission.
- Describes the Green India Mission's objectives (preserving and conserving greenery) but does not explicitly list green accounting among the mission objectives in the quoted text.
- Provides context that the mission focuses on pollution reduction and increasing carbon sinks, which the paper treats alongside green accounting in its analysis.
Defines Green GDP as subtracting environmental degradation/resource depletion from national output and notes the Centre is initiating measurement of States' green GDP.
A student could infer that if the Centre is measuring Green GDP for States, related missions (like Green India) might align with or promote such accounting; they could check Green India Mission documents for mention of green accounting or linkages to Green GDP work.
Explains the concept of 'green economy' as national-policy-dependent and linked to sustainable development and inclusive growth.
One could reasonably expect national missions addressing forestry/environment to include economic instruments or accounting measures to align with a green economy approach; verify whether Green India Mission lists budget/accounting aims.
Describes fiscal measures (state green cess, eco tax, Clean Energy Cess) used to capture environmental externality costs through taxation.
Shows precedent for fiscal recognition of environmental costs; a student could look for analogous language in Green India Mission about internalizing environmental costs via budgets or cess/earmarked funds.
Summarizes the constitutional/technical framework for preparing annual budgets (distinguishing revenue and capital accounts).
A student could use this to assess where 'green accounting' entries would appear in Union/State budgets (revenue vs capital) and then inspect budget documents for such line items linked to the Green India Mission.
Provides examples of what is included in government capital budgets and practice of budget categorization.
This helps a student reason where environmental asset/liability adjustments or green accounting entries might be recorded and then check whether Green India Mission proposes such budgetary treatment.
- Official mission document lists forest/restoration strategies (e.g., tree plantation) rather than agricultural intensification.
- The cited strategy focuses on saturating vulnerable landscapes through tree plantation, not launching a 'second green revolution'.
- The mission links forests and natural ecosystems to food, water and livelihood security, framing food security as an ecosystem service impact.
- This link to food security is via forest ecosystem services, not an explicit aim to boost agricultural output via a 'second green revolution'.
- A secondary source summarizes the mission's objectives as lowering pollution and increasing carbon sinks, emphasizing conservation and restoration.
- There is no mention here of launching a 'second green revolution' to increase agricultural output.
Provides an explicit list of objectives commonly attributed to a 'second Green Revolution', including raising agricultural productivity to promote food security.
A student could compare this canonical list of 'second Green Revolution' aims with the stated aims of the Green India Mission to see if agriculture/food-security objectives match; if not present, that argues against the statement.
States that rising future food demand requires increased production from new areas and that first Green Revolution production has plateaued—offering the rationale for a 'second' push in agriculture.
Use this rationale to test whether the Green India Mission's aims address agricultural intensification or instead focus on other measures (e.g., forest/green cover), by checking mission scope.
Summarises Green Revolution achievements emphasizing self-sufficiency in staple foods and increased productivity—showing the usual policy link between 'green' initiatives and food-security goals.
A student could use this pattern (green initiatives → food security) to examine whether the Green India Mission similarly frames its activities as intended to boost staple production or if its targets are ecological/forestry-oriented.
Notes that 'Green Revolution' historically aimed at self-sufficiency in foodgrains and was explicitly launched as an agricultural strategy to increase output.
Compare the historical 'Green Revolution' agricultural focus with the title 'Green India Mission' to judge whether the latter likely denotes an agricultural 'second revolution' or a different (e.g., forestry/green cover) programme by consulting the mission description.
Shows production growth trajectories and the need for further increases to meet future demand—supporting why governments might propose new large-scale agricultural initiatives.
Use these production trends to assess whether a mission labelled 'Green India' would plausibly include measures aimed specifically at increasing agricultural output, by comparing trends to the mission's stated objectives.
- Explicitly mentions protecting, restoring and enhancing India’s forest and tree cover.
- Directly links those actions to responding to climate change through adaptation and mitigation measures and enhancing carbon sinks.
- States the Mission aims at responding to climate change through a combination of adaptation and mitigation measures.
- Connects that aim to enhancing carbon sinks in sustainably managed forests, implying restoration/enhancement of forest cover.
Lists sub-missions that explicitly include 'Enhancing quality of forest cover and improving ecosystem services', 'Ecosystem restoration and increase in forest cover', 'Agro-forestry ... creating carbon sink' — items that match restoring/enhancing forest cover and mitigation via carbon sinks.
A student could connect these sub-mission goals to the Green India Mission (a known national mission) and infer the mission targets both forest cover restoration and mitigation (carbon sinks), then check mission documents for explicit wording on adaptation.
Describes a national 'Climate Smart' framework that explicitly intends to combat climate change through both mitigation and adaptation measures, showing a policy pattern of pairing these approaches.
A student might generalize that major Indian climate-related missions adopt combined adaptation/mitigation approaches and therefore expect the Green India Mission to include both types of measures.
States at the UNFCCC-related level that objectives should include 'Minimizing negative impacts through adaptation measures ... and mitigation at the global level', establishing a normative linkage between adaptation and mitigation in climate policy.
A student could use this stated national/international objective to argue it's plausible for national missions (like Green India Mission) to frame goals in terms of both adaptation and mitigation.
Mentions 'enhancing green cover' as part of India's climate action (INDC) and links green cover to national emission-intensity reduction achievements, implying forest/green cover is a recognized climate measure.
One can reasonably infer that a mission focused on forests would be tied to national climate commitments and thus include climate-relevant aims (mitigation and possibly adaptation).
Notes India has a strong, growing afforestation programme accelerated by policy (Forest Conservation Act), showing precedent for government programmes focused on afforestation and forest restoration.
A student could treat this as contextual precedent: if India runs afforestation programmes for ecological/legislative reasons, a named mission like Green India Mission likely continues that pattern and could include restoration and climate objectives.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. The 8 Missions under NAPCC are fundamental static-current overlap topics; confusing Forestry with Agriculture here is a fatal error.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) and its 8 distinct sub-missions.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 8 NAPCC pillars: 1. Solar, 2. Enhanced Energy Efficiency, 3. Sustainable Habitat, 4. Water, 5. Himalayan Ecosystem, 6. Green India (Forests), 7. Sustainable Agriculture, 8. Strategic Knowledge. Contrast 'Green India Mission' with 'Bringing Green Revolution to Eastern India' (BGREI).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Decode the Ministry logic. 'Green Accounting' is a Finance/Statistics domain (MoSPI). 'Green Revolution' is Agriculture (MoA&FW). 'Green India' is Environment (MoEFCC). A single mission rarely crosses these rigid bureaucratic silos.
The statement asks about incorporating environmental costs/benefits into budgets — the concept is directly connected to Green GDP and green accounting mentioned in the references.
Green GDP/green accounting is high-yield for UPSC because it links environmental degradation to economic indicators and policy choices; questions often test measurement challenges, implications for sustainable development, and policy instruments. Master by studying definitions, measurement issues, and examples of state-level initiatives.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > GREEN GDP > p. 606
Incorporating environmental costs into budgets is a policy tool within the broader idea of a 'green economy' described in the references.
Understanding India’s framing of the green economy (contextualised to national priorities) helps answer questions on sustainable development policy, programme design, and trade-offs. Prepare by linking Rio+20 outcomes to national schemes and studying policy rationales.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.22. GREEN ECONOMY > p. 342
Any proposal to include environmental costs/benefits in Union/State budgets must operate within the constitutional and structural framework of the budget as outlined in the references.
Budget basics are foundational for UPSC: they explain where and how new accounting items (like environmental adjustments) could appear. Questions often require linking constitutional provisions and budget documents to policy reforms; revise Article 112, budget components, and how new metrics could be integrated into revenue/capital accounts.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > 5.1 GOVERNMENT BUDGET — MEANING AND ITS COMPONENTS > p. 66
The evidence explicitly lists the main objectives of a 'second Green Revolution', which is the phrase used in the statement.
High-yield concept for UPSC: knowing the stated aims (raise productivity, emphasis on biotechnology, sustainable agriculture, self-sufficiency, farmer income) helps answer questions on agricultural policy goals and reform proposals. Connects to questions on policy design, food security and technological interventions; prepare by memorising objective lists and comparing with contemporary missions.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SECOND GREEN REVOLUTION > p. 75
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SECOND GREEN REVOLUTION > p. 74
Multiple references describe how the Green Revolution increased foodgrain production and aimed at self-sufficiency — the core outcome referenced in the statement.
Essential for UPSC: questions often ask about historical impacts of agricultural policy on food security. Understanding production figures, phases, and the self-sufficiency outcome enables linking past policies to current missions. Study by timeline and cause–effect (policy → HYV seeds/irrigation → production/self-sufficiency).
- Economics, Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: Food Security in India > Let's Discuss > p. 46
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > Green Revolution—Achievements > p. 73
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > Green Revolution > p. 303
Sources highlight environmental problems and regional disparities from the first Green Revolution and the need to use rainfed areas — explaining why a 'second' revolution might be framed differently.
Valuable for UPSC essays and mains answers: shows nuance that productivity increases can create sustainability and equity issues. Enables balanced answers on agricultural policy trade-offs and the need for inclusive, ecologically sound strategies. Prepare by linking environmental impacts to policy responses.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > SECOND GREEN REVOLUTION > p. 74
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Envisioning a New Socio-Economic Order > a) Green Revolution > p. 119
The 'National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture' (NMSA) is the actual NAPCC mission that covers the themes in Statement 2 (agriculture/food security). The examiner swapped the objectives of Mission 6 (GIM) and Mission 7 (NMSA).
Apply the 'Bureaucratic Silo' heuristic. Statement 1 (Green Accounting) requires Ministry of Finance/Statistics intervention. Statement 2 (Agri Output) is Ministry of Agriculture. GIM is a MoEFCC flagship. A MoEFCC mission will not have the primary mandate of changing National Budgeting standards or ensuring Food Security.
Connect GIM to India's NDCs under the Paris Agreement: specifically the target to create an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030.