Question map
Which of the following statements is/are correct? Proper design and effective implementation of UN-REDD+ Programme can significantly contribute to 1. protection of biodiversity 2. resilience of forest ecosystems 3. poverty reduction Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because all three statements are correct.
REDD+ goes beyond merely checking deforestation and forest degradation, and includes incentives for positive elements of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks[1], which directly supports biodiversity protection and forest ecosystem resilience. The set of decisions bolsters forest preservation and sustainable use of forests with direct benefits for people who live in and around forests[2], indicating that the programme contributes to poverty reduction by providing direct benefits to forest-dependent communities.
Additionally, the documents note that forests provide multiple benefits for livelihoods and biodiversity to societies while storing carbon at the same time[3], and the UN-REDD Programme supports the capacity of national governments to prepare and implement national REDD+ strategies with the active involvement of all stakeholders, including indigenous peoples and other forest-dependent communities[4]. This comprehensive approach demonstrates that proper design and implementation of UN-REDD+ can simultaneously achieve biodiversity protection, enhance forest ecosystem resilience, and reduce poverty through sustainable forest management and stakeholder involvement.
Sources- [1] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.17. REDD & REDD+ > p. 337
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Cutting emissions from deforestation - (the Warsaw Framework for REDD+") > p. 330
- [3] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/REDD%20Leaflet%20Supporting_countries_to_get_ready_for_REDD+%20ENG.pdf
- [4] https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/REDD%20Leaflet%20Supporting_countries_to_get_ready_for_REDD+%20ENG.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Co-benefits' question. UPSC moves beyond the primary aim (carbon) to secondary impacts (biodiversity, livelihoods). If you only studied REDD+ as a carbon mechanism, you missed the 'Plus'. The '+' literally stands for conservation and sustainable management, which implies biodiversity and livelihood links.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can proper design and effective implementation of the UN-REDD+ Programme significantly contribute to protection of biodiversity?
- Statement 2: Can proper design and effective implementation of the UN-REDD+ Programme significantly contribute to resilience of forest ecosystems?
- Statement 3: Can proper design and effective implementation of the UN-REDD+ Programme significantly contribute to poverty reduction?
- Defines REDD+ as including incentives for conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancement of forest carbon stocks — measures that protect habitat and species.
- Directly links REDD+ scope to positive conservation actions beyond mere emissions reduction.
- Describes the UN-REDD Programme administered by UN agencies and supporting national capacity to prepare and implement REDD strategies.
- Capacity building and stakeholder involvement enable practical implementation that can reduce deforestation — a primary threat to biodiversity.
- Warsaw Framework decisions bolster forest preservation and sustainable use, creating institutional backing for forest protection.
- Establishes means for results-based payments contingent on demonstrating forest protection, creating incentives aligned with biodiversity outcomes.
- States UN-REDD provides multiple benefits to livelihoods and biodiversity while storing carbon — outcomes that support ecosystem resilience.
- Indicates the Programme conducts national forest assessments and monitors policy and institutional change, key elements for effective design and implementation.
- Explains the Programme helps countries prepare and implement national REDD+ strategies — showing focus on proper design and implementation.
- Highlights active involvement of stakeholders, including indigenous and forest-dependent communities, which supports socially robust, resilient outcomes.
- Describes the Programme's aim to significantly reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation — actions that directly reduce pressures on forest ecosystems.
- Notes broad geographic support (many partner countries), indicating potential for large-scale positive impacts on forest resilience when well implemented.
Describes UN-REDD as a multi-agency programme that supports national governments to prepare and implement national REDD strategies with stakeholder involvement.
A student could infer that strong design + stakeholder-inclusive implementation capacity at national level is a prerequisite for actions that strengthen forest resilience, and then check case examples or national plans for concrete resilience measures.
Defines REDD+ as including conservation, sustainable management and enhancement of forest carbon stocks beyond just stopping deforestation.
One could extend this to argue that interventions aimed at conservation and sustainable management are likely to enhance ecosystem resilience, and then compare REDD+ measures with resilience-enhancing practices (e.g., diversity, restoration).
Notes the Warsaw Framework bolsters forest preservation and sustainable use and links results-based payments to demonstrated protection of forests.
A student could reason that financial incentives tied to verifiable forest protection can motivate implementation of resilience-building practices and then look for evidence where payments enabled restoration or sustainable management.
Explains the Forest Investment Program provides scaled-up financing for readiness reforms and public/private investments identified through national REDD readiness strategies.
This suggests that funding for readiness and investments is a mechanism by which REDD+ can support on-the-ground actions (e.g., restoration, fire management) that improve resilience; one could map financed activities to resilience outcomes.
Lists ecosystem services and explicitly states forests help in maintaining the resilience characteristics of ecosystems.
Use this definition of resilience to evaluate whether typical REDD+/REDD+ interventions (conservation, sustainable management, carbon enhancement) would preserve or strengthen those specific services.
- Explicitly states REDD+ decisions 'bolster forest preservation and sustainable use of forests with direct benefits for people who live in and around forests'.
- Identifies 'results-based payments' as a mechanism for rewarding demonstrated forest protection — a direct income/benefit channel to local populations.
- Provides a concrete estimate of economic value: REDD+ in India could provide over USD 3 billion as carbon service incentives.
- Monetary incentives of this scale imply potential resources that could be redirected to livelihoods or poverty-alleviation if well implemented.
- Describes UN-REDD as a multi-agency programme supporting capacity of national governments to prepare and implement national REDD strategies.
- Emphasizes involvement of all stakeholders — indicating that proper design and implementation (inclusive, capacity-driven) are core programme elements enabling benefits to local people.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter (Conceptual). Covered in standard texts (Shankar IAS Ch. 24) and basic current affairs.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The '+' in REDD+. Understanding that REDD was just 'avoided deforestation', but REDD+ added 'conservation, sustainable management, and enhancement of carbon stocks'.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 5 activities of REDD+: (1) Reducing deforestation, (2) Reducing degradation, (3) Conservation, (4) Sustainable management, (5) Enhancement of carbon stocks. Agencies: UN-REDD = FAO + UNDP + UNEP. Funding: FCPF (World Bank) vs UN-REDD (UN Trust Fund).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Think in 'Ecosystem Services'. If a program saves a forest, it AUTOMATICALLY saves biodiversity (habitat) and increases resilience (water/soil). If it involves 'payments for ecosystem services' (PES), it AUTOMATICALLY links to poverty reduction.
REDD+ explicitly expands REDD to include conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancement of forest carbon stocks — directly relevant to biodiversity protection.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask how climate mechanisms intersect with biodiversity and development. Understanding REDD+ lets candidates explain policy design that links carbon incentives to habitat protection, enabling answers on mitigation-adaptation-biodiversity co-benefits. Prepare by comparing REDD and REDD+ objectives and real-world implications.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.17. REDD & REDD+ > p. 337
UN-REDD's role is to support countries to design and implement REDD+ strategies with stakeholder involvement — a practical pathway to reduce deforestation and protect biodiversity.
Important for UPSC: links institutional mechanisms to on-ground conservation outcomes. Helps answer questions on international climate finance, governance, and effectiveness of multilateral programmes. Study programme structure, agency roles, and readiness activities.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > UN-BEDD Programme > p. 347
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Forest Carbon Partnership Facility > p. 344
The Warsaw Framework provides decisions and results-based payment mechanisms that create incentives for demonstrable forest protection — tying finance to biodiversity outcomes.
Valuable concept: exam questions probe incentive structures and international frameworks. Understanding results-based finance clarifies how policy design drives implementation and accountability. Focus on how conditional payments encourage measurable conservation results.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Cutting emissions from deforestation - (the Warsaw Framework for REDD+") > p. 330
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.17. REDD & REDD+ > p. 337
REDD+ expands REDD by including conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancement of forest carbon stocks — central to how the programme can deliver benefits.
Understanding the difference clarifies why REDD+ can generate both climate mitigation and socioeconomic incentives; UPSC questions often link environmental mechanisms to development outcomes. Master this to answer questions on forest policy, climate finance and rural livelihoods. Study definitions, scope, and examples of incentive-linked mechanisms.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > 24.17. REDD & REDD+ > p. 337
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Cutting emissions from deforestation - (the Warsaw Framework for REDD+") > p. 330
References identify results-based payments and estimated carbon service revenues (e.g., USD 3 billion) as the financial channels through which REDD+ can deliver local benefits.
High-yield for essays and GS mains where links between climate finance and poverty alleviation are tested. Helps frame arguments on implementation design, fiscal flows, and conditionality. Prepare by studying payment-for-ecosystem-services models and country examples.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > L)" tr4 ...sk-r EHUIRSNMEN.= frjr > p. 338
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > Cutting emissions from deforestation - (the Warsaw Framework for REDD+") > p. 330
UN-REDD supports national capacity to prepare/implement strategies with stakeholder involvement — key implementation elements that determine whether benefits reach the poor.
Frequently tested theme: policy design vs implementation gap. Useful for questions on programme effectiveness, decentralisation, and participatory approaches. Focus on institutional roles, stakeholder engagement, and implementation bottlenecks.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 24: Climate Change Organizations > UN-BEDD Programme > p. 347
The 'Agency Trap': UN-REDD is a partnership of FAO, UNDP, and UNEP. However, the 'Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF)' is managed by the World Bank. UPSC loves to swap these agencies in statements.
The 'Utopian Qualifier' Hack. The question starts with 'Proper design and effective implementation...'. This removes all real-world flaws. In a theoretically perfect implementation, does saving a forest help the poor and the ecosystem? Yes. Extreme positive possibilities are usually correct in Science/Env questions.
Mains GS-3 (Environment & Economy): Use REDD+ as a case study for 'Green Economy'. It monetizes 'Natural Capital' (forests) to fund 'Social Capital' (tribal livelihoods), linking Article 21 (Livelihood) with Article 48A (Environment).