"Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan' is a national campaign to

Shows the pattern that 'Abhiyaan' (campaign) names are used for national initiatives launched by a government ministry (e.g., Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan).

A student could infer that a scheme named 'Rashtriya ... Abhiyaan' might similarly be a centrally launched campaign and then check ministry notifications or programme descriptions to verify its objectives.

Provides concrete facts about the scale and needs of the urban homeless (lack of night shelters, ID documents), highlighting typical rehabilitation needs addressed by policies.

One could use this to reason that a campaign claiming to rehabilitate homeless persons would likely include provisions for shelters, identity documentation, and access to services—so check if Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan lists these components.

Gives an historical example (Sharada Sadan/Mukti Sadan) where shelters plus vocational training were used to make destitute persons self-reliant.

A student could compare the program elements (shelter + vocational training) with the stated components of Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan to judge whether it fits the rehabilitation + livelihood model.

Lists national livelihood programmes (NRLM, NULM, PMKVY) as established mechanisms for providing skill development and livelihood access.

Use this to test whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan partners with or resembles these missions (e.g., targets urban/rural livelihoods or skill training) to assess its livelihood provision claim.

Describes MGNREGA as a major statutory programme aimed at livelihood security—illustrating the kind of large-scale intervention that provides livelihoods to vulnerable groups.

A student could check whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan coordinates with or complements national livelihood guarantees like MGNREGA when claiming to provide suitable livelihood sources.

Shows the Government launches nationwide 'Abhiyaan' campaigns (e.g., 'Beti Bachao–Beti Padhao') to address social discrimination and promote welfare.

A student could check whether 'Rashtriya ... Abhiyaan' follows this naming/policy pattern and is therefore likely to be a government-led social campaign addressing vulnerable groups.

Describes another national 'Abhiyaan' (Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan) launched by a central ministry to address a social problem and provide helpline/support.

One could infer that similarly named campaigns may be ministry-backed and provide outreach or alternative services, so verify which ministry (if any) sponsors Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan.

Mentions trafficking and 'flesh trade' involving specific communities, linking sex work/trafficking with identified social problems in India.

A student might use this to justify looking for programmes aimed at those communities (e.g., targeted rehabilitation or livelihood schemes) when investigating Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan.

Lists PIL categories including bonded labour and exploitation, indicating legal and policy attention to forced/exploitative labour situations.

This suggests routes (court/PIL) and policy frameworks exist to support release/rehabilitation of exploited persons; a student could check whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan operates within such frameworks.

Supreme Court recognition that right to life includes right to livelihood and that evicted persons should be provided alternative accommodation/livelihood.

This precedent supports the plausible policy principle that programmes seeking to remove people from certain livelihoods should offer alternatives; one could test whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan explicitly follows this principle.

Describes a nation-wide campaign aimed at cleaning public spaces and 'doing away with manual scavenging', showing such campaigns have explicit sanitation/manual-scavenging goals.

A student could compare the language, scope, and timeframe of this described campaign with descriptions of Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan (from other sources) to see if they match in objective and scale.

Explains Swachh Bharat Abhiyan as a collective national sanitation campaign, giving a pattern of how India runs nationwide cleanliness drives.

Use this pattern to check whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan is similarly structured (national, citizen participation, sanitation focus) which would support it being a national campaign against manual scavenging.

Shows official recognition of 'manual scavenger families' in SECC 2011 as a distinct vulnerable category eligible for welfare, indicating government programs often target manual scavengers for rehabilitation.

A student could infer that national campaigns addressing sanitation often include rehabilitation components and then look for evidence that Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan included such welfare/rehabilitation measures.

Provides historical/social context linking caste, poverty, and manual menial occupations (like scavenging), suggesting campaigns against manual scavenging are both social and policy issues.

Apply this context to expect that a credible national campaign (like Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan) would address social stigma and rehabilitation, prompting checks for such components in its description.

Notes Gandhi's promotion of manual work (including scavenging) as social practice, illustrating historical approaches to manual scavenging that differ from eradication/rehabilitation models.

Use this as a contrast: if Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan is framed as eradication and rehabilitation, it represents a different, policy-led approach than historical integrationist views—so look for explicit modern policy language.

Explains that bonded labour is a recognized form of exploitation in India and has been criminalised, showing the issue is a subject of national legal and policy concern.

A student could take this rule (bonded labour is a declared crime) and check whether national campaigns or programmes have been launched to implement the law—e.g., look for an Indian government campaign named Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan related to bonded labour release.

Defines 'bonded labour' and lists central statutes (Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976) indicating institutional mechanisms for abolition and rehabilitation.

Using the existence of statutory abolition and rehabilitation provisions, a student could search for national-level initiatives or campaigns (by name) that operationalise these statutory duties, such as programmes to release and rehabilitate bonded labourers.

Mentions 'Right not to be subjected to bonded labor and to be rehabilitated after release' as a legal/constitutional concern, implying state responsibility for rehabilitation.

A student could use this constitutional framing to infer that any legitimate national campaign addressing bonded labour would include rehabilitation components and then verify if Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan includes such components.

Lists 'Bonded labour matters' among categories ordinarily entertained as Public Interest Litigation, signalling high-level judicial and public attention to bonded labour issues.

Given this public-importance classification, a student could reasonably expect nationwide responses (government campaigns or NGO-led national drives) and then look up whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan is one such nationwide response focused on release and rehabilitation.

Describes the practice and social context of bonded labour (life-long servitude, child labour links) showing why targeted campaigns for release and rehabilitation would be needed.

A student could use the described social harms as criteria (release, child protection, rehabilitation) to evaluate whether Rashtriya Garima Abhiyaan’s stated objectives match those needs.