Question map
With reference to the cultural history of medieval India, consider the following statements : 1. Siddhas (Sittars) of Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry. 2. Lingayats of Kannada region questioned the theory of rebirth and rejected the caste hierarchy. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because both statements are accurate.
**Statement 1 is correct:** Siddhas (Sittars) of Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.[2] This reflects their distinctive spiritual approach in medieval Tamil culture.
**Statement 2 is correct:** The Lingayats (Virashaivas) of Karnataka indeed challenged core Brahmanical doctrines. They questioned the theory of rebirth.[3] Additionally, the Lingayats challenged the idea of caste and the "pollution" attributed to certain groups by Brahmanas.[3] In the thirteenth century, the Virashaiva or Lingayat sect of Karnataka founded by Basava believed in one God (Parashiva).[4]
Both movements represented significant reformist tendencies in medieval Indian religious history, challenging established orthodox practices and promoting more egalitarian spiritual paths. Therefore, both statements 1 and 2 are correct, making option C the right answer.
Sources- [3] THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART II, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Bhakti-Sufi Traditions > 3. The Virashaiva Tradition in Karnataka > p. 147
- [4] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 10: Advent of Arabs and Turks > Religion > p. 149
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewStatement 2 is a verbatim lift from NCERT Class XII (Themes II, p.147), making it a non-negotiable 'Sitter'. Statement 1 is a classic fact from the Tamil Nadu Class 11 History textbook. The strategy is binary: Master the NCERT 'Bhakti-Sufi' chapter for the core, and use TN Board History to cover the specific cultural nuances of South India.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the cultural history of medieval India, were the Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region monotheistic?
- Statement 2: In the cultural history of medieval India, did the Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region condemn idolatry?
- Statement 3: In the cultural history of medieval India, did the Lingayats of the Kannada region question the theory of rebirth?
- Statement 4: In the cultural history of medieval India, did the Lingayats of the Kannada region reject the caste hierarchy?
- Directly states the claim that Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.
- The line appears as a clear declarative item in a cultural-history question context, indicating the assertion is attributed to that tradition.
- Repeats the same assertion that Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.
- Serves as an independent web instance presenting the claim in an educational/quiz format.
- Contains the same statement as part of a list used in a curricular/exam context, corroborating that this view is presented in study materials.
- Explicitly links the Siddhas to monotheism and condemnation of idolatry in the quoted line.
Describes the Tamil Bhakti movement centred on Saivism and Vaishnavism, showing the region had strong sectarian devotional traditions.
A student could check whether Siddha literature aligns with Saivite or Vaishnava devotionalism (which may be theistic) or with non-theistic/heterodox strains.
Notes the temple became the nucleus of the Bhakti movement in Tamil country, implying religious life was often organised around deity-worship.
Use this to test whether Siddhas operated within temple-centred deity worship (suggesting theistic practice) or outside it (suggesting other orientations).
Refers to a 'popular monotheistic movement along with Vaishnava Bhakti' and 'monotheists' distinct from dominant religions.
A student could compare Siddha teachings to descriptions of these monotheistic currents to see if Siddhas claimed a single supreme deity.
Gives an example of a regional Hindu monotheistic sect (Virashaiva/Lingayat) that believed in one God (Parashiva), showing medieval South India had precedents for monotheistic Hindu sects.
Use this pattern to ask whether Siddhas articulated a comparable 'one-God' doctrine (e.g., Parashiva) or were doctrinally different (mystical, tantric, pantheistic).
Highlights that Tamil bhakti poets often opposed Buddhism and Jainism, indicating sharp doctrinal distinctions in the region's religious discourse.
A student could investigate whether Siddhas framed their teaching in opposition to other religions (as monotheists sometimes did) or in a different, non-theistic/mystical register.
- Explicitly states that Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.
- Directly ties the Siddhas to the cultural-history claim about medieval India.
- Repeats the same sentence asserting the Siddhas were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.
- Serves as an independent source corroborating the claim within study/quiz material.
- Again states clearly that Siddhas (Sittars) of the Tamil region were monotheistic and condemned idolatry.
- Appears in exam-prep material, directly supporting the historical claim.
Specifically names 'sittar' poets (Tayumanavar) and says they 'protested against the abuses of temple-rule and the caste system', indicating some Siddha/Sittar critique of temple-related practices.
A student could check whether 'abuses of temple-rule' critiques included rejection of idol worship by consulting sittar hymns or secondary studies of Tayumanavar.
Describes the Bhakti movement in the Tamil region as expressed through Nayanmars and Azhwars using hymns and temple-related devotional musicโestablishing that mainstream devotional practice was temple- and image-centred.
Compare the siddha/sittar corpus with bhakti hymns to see if Siddhas opposed this temple-centred, image-based devotion.
States that the hymns of Azhwars and Nayanmars 'inaugurated the bhakti cult' and that rulers patronized bhakti, showing strong institutional support for temple/idol worship in the region.
Use this as a baseline of strong temple/idolatry practices to test whether Siddhasโ writings were reacting against that dominant model.
Notes inscriptions and temple records are major sources and that the Bhakti movement found expression in songs of Azhwars and Nayanmars, again illustrating the prominence of temple-centred religion in sources.
A student could look for absence or presence of siddha critique in these temple-related sources or in complementary literary sources to infer attitudes toward idolatry.
Describes extensive temple-building and idol sculpture (Siva, Vishnu, etc.) under Pandyas, indicating a pervasive cult of images in medieval Tamil society.
Treat this as contextual evidence: if temple/idol worship was pervasive, any siddha condemnation would stand out and be traceable in siddha literature or critiques.
- Direct statement that the Lingayats 'questioned the theory of rebirth.'
- Places this claim within the Virashaiva (Lingayat) reform context (funerary practice, caste challenge), reinforcing that questioning rebirth was part of their doctrinal stance.
- Identifies the Virashaiva/Lingayat sect of Karnataka (founded by Basava) and notes distinctive beliefs and social reforms.
- Provides contextual support that the sect held doctrines distinct from orthodox Brahmanical positions, making it plausible they questioned orthodox beliefs like rebirth.
- States that rebirth was a topic of hot debate among medieval thinkers.
- Situates the Lingayat critique within a wider intellectual environment where rebirth was contested.
- Explicitly states the Lingayats 'challenged the idea of caste' and the pollution concept promoted by Brahmanas
- Describes social reforms (burial instead of cremation, questioning rebirth, remarriage of widows) that undercut Dharmashastra-based caste norms
- Identifies the Virashaiva/Lingayat sect as denying caste distinctions
- Notes changes in social roles (better status for women, end of Brahman monopoly on priesthood) that imply rejection of caste hierarchy
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter for Statement 2 (Direct NCERT Themes II); Moderate for Statement 1 (Standard TN Board fact).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Protest' tradition within Bhakti. Distinguishing between 'Conformist' (Vedic-friendly) and 'Radical' (Anti-caste/Anti-ritual) movements.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Siddhas (Tamil, Agastya/Tirumular, Medicine, Monotheistic/Void worship); Lingayats (Basavanna, Vachanas, Burial over Cremation, Ishtalinga); Nathpanthis (North India, Yoga/Tantra, influence on Kabir).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Never study Bhakti saints just as 'devotees'. Classify them immediately: Did they accept the Vedas/Idols (Saguna) or reject them (Nirguna/Siddhas)? This binary classification solves the question instantly.
The question concerns religious tendencies in medieval Tamil region; several references describe Tamil devotionalism centred on Nayanmars and Azhwars.
High-yield for UPSC: Tamil bhakti literature and saints are frequently asked in cultural history sections. Understanding who the Nayanmars/Azhwars were, their genre (hymns), and their role in popularising devotional practices helps answer questions on regional religious developments. Prepare by reviewing primary features of Tamil bhakti, key saintly groups, and their literary outputs.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > 9.6 Tamil Devotionalism > p. 130
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > 9.6 Tamil Devotionalism > p. 129
The references discuss 'monotheistic movements' alongside Bhakti and cite examples (e.g., Virashaiva/Lingayat), relevant when assessing claims that particular groups were monotheistic.
Important because UPSC often asks about sectarian reforms and ideas (monotheism vs. polytheism, reformist trends). Candidates should distinguish between explicit monotheistic sects (e.g., Lingayat example in the references) and general devotional trends. Study comparative features, doctrinal claims, and socio-religious consequences to tackle source-based and analytical questions.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 10: Advent of Arabs and Turks > Religion > p. 149
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 13: Cultural Syncretism: Bhakti Movement in India > 13.2 Spread of Bhakti Movement to the North India > p. 192
Assessing religious identity of groups (like Siddhas) requires situating them within patronage networks; references note Pallava/Pandya patronage and the temple's centrality.
Useful for framing answers: UPSC questions connect religious movements to polity and social bases. Master the link between regional rulers, merchant elites, temple institutions, and devotional movements to explain spread, orthodoxy challenges, and social impacts. Use a mix of polity-culture sources and case studies for revision.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > 9.6 Tamil Devotionalism > p. 129
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART II, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Bhakti-Sufi Traditions > 2.4 Relations with the state > p. 145
Several references describe the emergence and features of Tamil bhakti, naming Azhwars and Nayanmars and their hymns as central to medieval Tamil religious life.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask about regional forms of Bhakti, their social base, and literary expressions. Mastering this helps connect religious movements to political patronage, language-literature development, and sectarian interactions. Prepare by mapping key groups (Azhwars, Nayanmars), chronology, and primary sources (hymns/temple literature).
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > 9.6 Tamil Devotionalism > p. 130
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > III The Bhakti Movement Azhwars and Navanmars > p. 133
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > Sources > p. 117
References highlight temples as the nucleus of Bhakti and describe temple-building, patronage, and administrative importance under Pallavas, Pandyas, and Cholas.
Important for polity-culture questions: temples functioned as religious, economic and social centres and are often linked to state patronage and social conflicts. Understanding temple architecture, patronage patterns, and temple-related inscriptions helps answer questions on state-society relations and cultural policy. Study inscriptions, temple economy, and examples of temple expansion.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > 9.6 Tamil Devotionalism > p. 129
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 11: Later Cholas and Pandyas > Temples > p. 171
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > Sources > p. 117
One reference explicitly notes that sittar poets (e.g., Tayumanavar) protested abuses of temple-rule and the caste system, indicating a polemical/social-critical strand in their literature.
Useful for thematic questions linking religious literature to social critique and reform. Knowing that certain devotional or mystical traditions critiqued temple administration and caste helps differentiate currents within Bhakti and related movements. Focus on representative poets and the social themes in their compositions.
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 2: Indian States and Society in the 18th Century > Social and Cultural Life > p. 42
References describe Lingayat practices (burial, caste denial, widow remarriage) and explicitly note they questioned rebirth, showing a systematic challenge to Brahmanical orthodoxy.
High-yield for medieval Indian history questions: explains social and religious reform movements in the Deccan, connects to themes of caste, ritual, and social reform. Mastering this helps answer comparative questions on heterodox movements and their social impact. Study primary textual sources (vachanas) and NCERT summaries to consolidate facts and examples.
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART II, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Bhakti-Sufi Traditions > 3. The Virashaiva Tradition in Karnataka > p. 147
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 10: Advent of Arabs and Turks > Religion > p. 149
The 'Nathpanthis' are the North Indian logical sibling to the Siddhas (both practiced Yoga/Tantra and rejected caste). A future question may target the 'Mahanubhavas' of Maharashtra (Chakradhar Swami) or the specific Lingayat concept of 'Kayaka' (Work is Worship).
The 'Radical Reformer' Heuristic: In the context of Medieval Bhakti, if a statement says a sect 'rejected caste', 'condemned idolatry', or 'questioned rebirth', it is highly likely TRUE. These groups are historically significant *precisely because* they broke these specific norms. Extreme phrasing here is often correct.
Mains GS1 (Indian Society): Link Basavanna's anti-caste movement to modern social justice. Mains GS2 (Polity): Cite 'Anubhava Mantapa' as an early example of deliberative democracy/parliament in India.