Which one of the following was a very important seaport in the Kakatiya kingdom ?

Lists Kakinada among intermediate and minor seaports on the eastern coast (modern description), giving a data point about its maritime role.

A student could combine this modern classification with a map and historical sources to check continuity of port importance from medieval to modern times for Kakinada.

States the Kakatiyas were the major power in Andhra in the 13th century, implying they controlled coastal Andhra where Kakinada is located.

Use the geographic fact that Kakinada lies in coastal Andhra to infer it was within Kakatiya sphere and then look for specific medieval port records or archaeology.

Gives a general pattern that South Indian kingdoms (e.g., Pallavas) had important seaports and active foreign trade networks.

Apply this general pattern to the Kakatiya context: if coastal Andhra participated similarly in maritime trade, Kakinada might have been significant—so check trade-route maps and medieval guild/inscriptional evidence for Kakinada.

Describes Kakatiya administrative/military structures (assignment of revenue/local control to Nayaks), indicating the kingdom exercised local governance that could include coastal ports.

A student could use this to look for inscriptions or revenue records naming Kakinada as a port under Kakatiya administrators.

Notes that certain administrative/military systems (palayakkarar-like) were practiced earlier in the Kakatiya kingdom, suggesting organized local control which often accompanies management of ports.

Combine this with knowledge of medieval port administration to search for evidence of Kakinada being managed or fortified in Kakatiya-period records.

Identifies the Kakatiyas as the medieval Andhra power with coastal territory, implying they had coastal ports under their control.

A student could locate Motupalli on an Andhra coastal map and check if it falls within the Kakatiya core/coastal zone to judge its potential importance.

Describes South Indian maritime trade (exports to SE Asia, existence of important seaports like Mamallapuram) showing that regional kingdoms maintained significant ports for overseas trade.

If Motupalli is on the Andhra coast, one could infer it might have functioned similarly for the Kakatiyas in regional and foreign trade networks.

Lists intermediate/minor ports on the eastern coast (Kakinada, Machilipatnam) indicating multiple functioning ports in Andhra coastal region.

Compare Motupalli's location to these named ports and known trade routes to assess whether Motupalli could have been of comparable importance.

Explains that eastern ports served large hinterlands and handled significant exports/imports, demonstrating the strategic economic role of Bay of Bengal ports.

A student could check whether Motupalli had access to a substantial hinterland or produced/exported goods listed here to support claims of importance.

Notes Kakatiya administrative/military organization (assignment of local revenues to leaders), implying the kingdom managed coastal revenues and localities.

Investigate whether Motupalli appears in records of revenue grants or naval/military assignments within the Kakatiya administrative system to infer its prominence.

Identifies the Kakatiyas as the major power in Andhra in the 13th–14th centuries, implying they controlled coastal Andhra where seaports would lie.

Locate Nelluru/Nellore on a map of coastal Andhra and check if it fell within Kakatiya-controlled territory to assess plausibility of being a Kakatiya seaport.

Lists intermediate/minor eastern ports in Andhra such as Machilipatnam, Kakinada, Kalingapatnam, showing the region had multiple active ports.

Compare Nelluru/Nellore's geographic position with these named ports and historical port networks to judge whether Nelluru fits the pattern of active coastal trade centres.

Describes South Indian maritime trade patterns (exports, guilds, and important seaports like Mamallapuram), providing a model of how ports functioned and were ranked.

Use this model (exports, merchant guild presence, foreign trade links) to check if historical records of Nelluru show similar trading activity to qualify as a 'very important' seaport.

Explicitly highlights 'maritime activity' as a topic of importance in regional histories, indicating that coastal cities are assessed by documented maritime roles.

Search for documentary or archaeological evidence of maritime activity (harbour structures, ship-related finds, foreign contacts) at Nelluru/Nellore to evaluate its importance.

Explains Kakatiya administrative practices (assignment of revenues/local control), suggesting ways to check if a port town was under Kakatiya administration and economically significant.

Look for Kakatiya-era land grants, revenue records, or administrative mentions naming Nelluru to infer its economic/strategic importance to the kingdom.