Question map
The Parliament of India exercises control over the functions of the Council of Ministers through 1. Adjournment motion 2. Question hour 3. Supplementary questions Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The Constitution of India established a parliamentary form of government in which the Executive is responsible to the Parliament for its policies and acts, and the Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour, zero hour, half-an-hour discussion, short duration discussion, calling attention motion, adjournment motion, no-confidence motion, censure motion and other discussions.[1]
**Adjournment motion** (Statement 1) is explicitly mentioned as one of the instruments through which Parliament controls the Executive. The first hour of every parliamentary sitting is slated for Question Hour, during which the members ask questions and the ministers usually give answers.[2] The question hour is perhaps the most effective method of keeping vigil on the executive and the administrative agencies of the government.[3]
**Supplementary questions** (Statement 3) are an integral part of the Question Hour mechanism. A starred question requires an oral answer and hence supplementary questions can follow.[2] These supplementary questions allow members to probe deeper into ministerial responses, thereby enhancing parliamentary control over the Executive.
Therefore, all three mechanismsβadjournment motion, question hour, and supplementary questionsβenable Parliament to exercise control over the Council of Ministers, making **option D (1, 2 and 3)** the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- [2] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Question Hour > p. 240
- [3] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Instruments of Parliamentary Control > p. 115
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a non-negotiable 'Sitter'. It comes directly from the 'Devices of Parliamentary Proceedings' section in Laxmikanth. If you get this wrong, you are statistically out of the race because 95% of serious aspirants will mark this correctly.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Do adjournment motions in the Parliament of India enable Parliament to exercise control over the functions of the Council of Ministers?
- Statement 2: Does Question Hour in the Parliament of India enable Parliament to exercise control over the functions of the Council of Ministers?
- Statement 3: Do supplementary questions asked during Question Hour in the Parliament of India enable Parliament to exercise control over the functions of the Council of Ministers?
- Explicitly lists 'adjournment motion' among the parliamentary devices through which Parliament exercises control over the Executive.
- States ministers are collectively and individually responsible to Parliament/Lok Sabha, placing adjournment motion in the context of executive accountability.
- Defines 'adjournment' as suspension of a sitting for a specified time, providing procedural context for an adjournment motion.
- Gives the formal meaning of adjournment, which helps explain how such a motion can interrupt proceedings and focus attention on executive actions.
- Affirms that the Lok Sabha controls the Council of Ministers and can remove them by no-confidence, establishing the broader framework of parliamentary control.
- Supports the relevance of parliamentary instruments (including adjournment motion as per other snippets) because the Lok Sabha holds authority over ministers.
- Explicitly states Parliament exercises control over the Executive through question-hour.
- Lists question-hour among instruments used to keep the Executive accountable.
- Connects ministerial responsibility to Parliament/Lok Sabha, implying Question Hour helps enforce that responsibility.
- Describes Question Hour as the daily period where ministers must respond to searching questions from MPs.
- Calls Question Hour 'perhaps the most effective method of keeping vigil on the executive', directly linking it to control.
- States ministers are answerable to the Lok Sabha through mechanisms like the Question Hour, which require justification of actions.
- Defines Question Hour as the stage when MPs ask ministers about government policies and activities, indicating oversight function.
- Explicitly states Parliament exercises control over the Executive through Question Hour among other instruments.
- Links parliamentary control mechanisms to ministerial responsibility, implying Question Hour aids oversight of the Council of Ministers.
- Specifies that starred questions require an oral answer and that supplementary questions can follow.
- Shows the procedural enabling detail that allows MPs to ask follow-ups, strengthening scrutiny during Question Hour.
- Describes Question Hour as a daily period where ministers respond to searching questions and highlights it as an effective method to keep vigil on the executive.
- Provides corroborating emphasis that Question Hour facilitates parliamentary oversight of administrative action.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct lift from Laxmikanth Chapter 23 (Parliament) > 'Devices of Parliamentary Proceedings'.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Article 75(3) - Collective Responsibility. The question tests the *mechanisms* that enforce this constitutional principle.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Exclusivity List': Adjournment, Censure, and No-Confidence motions are Lok Sabha ONLY. Contrast: Calling Attention (Indian innovation, in Rules) vs Zero Hour (Indian innovation, NOT in Rules). Know the support needed (50 members for Adjournment/No-Confidence).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not read motions in isolation. Group them by function: 'To get info' (Question Hour, Calling Attention) vs 'To scold/remove' (Censure, Adjournment, No-Confidence). The question asked for 'control', which encompasses both scrutiny and removal.
Reference [1] lists adjournment motion alongside question-hour, no-confidence, censure and others as means by which Parliament controls the Executive.
High-yield for UPSC: frequently tested in polity questions about parliamentary oversight and accountability. Links to topics on separation of powers, legislative procedures and executive responsibility; enables answering questions comparing tools (e.g., no-confidence vs adjournment). Master by memorising key instruments and their purposes.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Instruments of Parliamentary Control > p. 117
References (e.g., [1], [9]) state that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, which is the constitutional basis for parliamentary control.
Core concept for UPSC polity: explains why parliamentary devices (motions, debates) matter. Connects to formation/dismissal of government, confidence motions, and Lok Sabha supremacy in executive accountability. Enables answers on ministerial responsibility, stability of government, and differences between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha powers.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Two Houses of Parliament > p. 63
Reference [5] defines adjournment (suspension of sitting), while [1] names adjournment motion as a control device β together they show its procedural role in oversight.
Useful for UPSC to distinguish types of parliamentary motions (procedural vs substantive). Helps answer questions on how parliamentary procedures are used to hold the executive to account and the limits/advantages of different motions. Learn by mapping each motion to its object, admissibility and likely impact.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Adjournment > p. 236
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
Multiple references identify Question Hour as a formal period where ministers must answer MPs, and label it an effective tool for keeping vigil on the executive.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often ask how Parliament holds the executive accountable; links to topics on parliamentary procedures and accountability mechanisms. Master this to explain specific oversight tools and their relative effectiveness in essays and mains answers.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Instruments of Parliamentary Control > p. 115
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
References tie ministerial collective (and individual) responsibility to Parliament/Lok Sabha control, which is enforced through Question Hour and related devices.
Core constitutional concept frequently tested in polity questions β explains why Lok Sabha control (including Question Hour) matters. Useful across prelims, mains and interviews when discussing executive-legislative relations and removal mechanisms.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Two Houses of Parliament > p. 63
Sources list Question Hour alongside Zero Hour, adjournment motions and no-confidence motions as instruments enabling parliamentary control of the executive.
Helps aspirants categorise and contrast oversight tools β useful for fixed-answer prelims items and analytical mains answers on checks and balances. Enables mapping of procedural tools to practical accountability outcomes.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Powers of Rajya Sabha > p. 109
References identify Question Hour as a primary mechanism by which Parliament scrutinises and controls the Executive.
High-yield for UPSC polity: explains a routine oversight mechanism and appears in questions on legislative checks on the executive. Connects to topics on parliamentary procedures and executive accountability; useful for answering why/how Parliament keeps the government answerable.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > fil l E~ecutive Powers and Functions > p. 257
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Instruments of Parliamentary Control > p. 115
The 'Censure Motion' vs 'No-Confidence Motion' trap is the next logical step. Censure needs a specific reason stated; No-Confidence does not. Censure can be against an individual minister; No-Confidence is only against the whole Council. Censure doesn't force resignation (technically); No-Confidence does.
Use 'Subset Logic'. Supplementary questions (Item 3) are an intrinsic part of Question Hour (Item 2). You cannot have effective Question Hour without the right to ask follow-ups. Thus, 2 and 3 are inseparable. This eliminates Option A. Since Adjournment Motion is a severe form of scolding the govt, 1 is obvious. Mark D.
Mains GS-2: 'Decline of Parliament'. When Question Hour is washed out due to disruptions, or when Adjournment Motions are disallowed arbitrarily, the 'Executive Accountability' mechanism breaks down, leading to 'Cabinet Dictatorship'.