Question map
Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs) are used to create digital display in many devices. What are the advantages of OLED displays over Liquid Crystal displays ? 1. OLED displays can be fabricated on flexible plastic substrates. 2. Roll-up displays embedded in clothing can be made using OLEDs. 3. Transparent displays are possible using OLEDs. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because all three statements are correct advantages of OLED displays over LCDs.
OLED displays can be fabricated on flexible plastic substrates[2], which is a key advantage over traditional LCD technology. This flexibility enables the fabrication of roll-up displays that can be embedded in fabrics or clothing[3], making statement 2 correct as well. For transparent displays, OLED types work well[4], confirming that transparent displays are possible using OLEDs, which validates statement 3. These advantages stem from OLEDs' distinct production techniques compared to LCD technology[2]. Since all three statements correctly identify genuine advantages of OLED displays over LCDs, option C (1, 2 and 3) is the correct answer.
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED
- [2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2773012325000305
- [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED
- [4] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41377-020-0341-9
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Emerging Tech' question. While NCERTs explain the physics of light and LEDs, the specific applications (flexible, transparent) come purely from Science & Tech current affairs. The key is not memorizing every gadget, but understanding the *structural difference* (OLED has no backlight) which enables these features.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can OLED displays be fabricated on flexible plastic substrates, enabling flexible displays compared to Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)?
- Statement 2: Can OLED technology be used to create roll-up displays that can be embedded in clothing, as an advantage over Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)?
- Statement 3: Are transparent displays possible using OLED technology, unlike typical Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs)?
- Explicitly states OLEDs can be fabricated on flexible plastic substrates.
- Mentions resulting flexible OLEDs and applications (e.g., roll-up displays in fabrics), implying flexibility not found with typical rigid LCDs.
- Directly compares OLEDs to LCDs and lists 'flexible plastic substrates' as one of OLEDs' advantages over LCD technology.
- Links flexible substrates to other practical benefits (lighter weight), reinforcing the comparative advantage.
- Provides experimental/technical evidence that OLEDs can be grown on barrier-coated flexible (plastic) substrates.
- Notes optical performance on flexible substrates is comparable or superior to devices on glass, supporting practical feasibility of flexible OLED displays.
Defines and distinguishes flexible plastic materials (e.g., flexible plastic sheets, covers, pouches), showing that plastics exist in flexible-sheet form suitable as substrates.
A student could combine this with the fact that display substrates are thin sheets to hypothesize that flexible plastic sheets might serve as display substrates and then check materials used in OLED/LCD manufacturing.
Notes that replacing a glass slab with a transparent plastic slab changes optical effects, implying transparent plastics can function similarly to glass in optical devices.
Using the basic fact that displays require transparent substrates, a student could infer transparent plastics might substitute for glass in display construction and investigate whether OLEDs can be deposited on such plastics.
Describes commonplace use of flexible plastics as insulating coverings on wires, demonstrating plastics can be used reliably in electrical/electronic contexts and in flexible form.
A student could extend this to ask whether similar electrical/thermal/chemical properties allow plastic substrates to host thin-film electronic layers used in OLEDs versus LCDs.
States that synthetic polymers (plastics) are affected by solar radiation and often require stabilizers or surface treatments for durability.
A student could use this to anticipate durability challenges for plastic-display substrates (e.g., UV stability, treatments) when comparing long-term performance of flexible plastic OLEDs vs glass-based LCDs.
- States OLEDs can be fabricated on flexible plastic substrates — a prerequisite for roll-up displays.
- Explicitly mentions “roll-up displays embedded in fabrics or clothing,” directly tying OLED capability to wearable/embedded use.
- Notes that OLED displays have grown rapidly and begun to challenge LCDs, especially in small-sized display markets.
- Supports the idea that OLEDs offer advantages (and adoption) over LCDs in applications where form factor and new use cases matter.
Textile manufacture is globally widespread and clothing is a basic need, implying large potential demand for innovations embedded in clothing.
A student could combine this market ubiquity with knowledge of flexible electronics to judge commercial incentive for roll-up wearable displays.
Mentions Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamps as a modern light source; LEDs are an emissive technology like OLEDs (both produce their own light).
Knowing LEDs are emissive, a student could infer OLEDs (also emissive) might not need bulky backlights, a property useful for flexible/rollable displays.
Defines luminous objects as those that emit their own light and notes how light interacts with materials (transparent/translucent/opaque).
Using the idea of self-emission and light transmission, a student could reason that an emissive thin film display could function when laminated into fabrics unlike transmissive LCDs requiring backlighting and polarizers.
Notes higher cost of LED is a hindrance to wider use, showing cost is a practical barrier to adopting newer lighting/display tech.
A student could extend this to consider cost trade-offs for OLEDs in clothing vs flexible LCDs — economic feasibility affects adoption of roll-up displays.
States technology applies scientific knowledge to make production easier and gives examples of tech enabling new capabilities.
A student could take this general rule to consider flexible electronic manufacturing advances (e.g., printable OLEDs) that would enable embedding roll-up displays into garments.
- Explicitly states that emissive OLED types are suitable for transparent displays.
- Directly names OLED alongside mLED/μLED as display types that 'work well' for transparent displays.
- Describes the typical transmission-type AMLCD stack including front polarizer, color filter, liquid crystal layer and back glass/TFT array.
- These fixed stack components (polarizers, color filters, backlight/TFT layers) are characteristic of conventional LCDs and imply a non-transparent transmission architecture.
- Cites a specific example: 'Highly transparent AMOLED display', showing OLED (AMOLED) implementations aimed at transparency.
- Supports the existence of transparent OLED-based displays in the literature/technology demonstrations.
Defines transparent materials as those through which light passes almost completely — establishes what 'transparent' means for a display.
A student could ask whether a display's layers and light sources can be arranged so most ambient light still passes through while the display also emits/controls light.
Summarises differences between transparent, translucent and opaque materials and notes some transparent objects can create faint shadows — useful for thinking about partial transparency in devices.
Use this to consider degrees of transparency for a display (fully vs partly transparent) and whether active components would make it translucent or still largely transparent.
Gives the example of looking through a flat transparent glass window pane where objects look the same — shows how a simple transparent sheet can allow undistorted viewing.
Compare a plain transparent pane to a multi-layer display stack to infer whether adding emitting layers could preserve window-like transparency.
Describes light rays changing direction at surfaces separating transparent media — highlights that adding layers/interfaces affects light transmission.
A student could consider how multiple thin layers in a display (substrates, electrodes) might refract/reflect light and thus reduce transparency unless designed to minimise such effects.
Notes that refraction effects depend on the pair of media — indicates optical behaviour varies with materials used in layered devices.
Apply this to think about choosing materials with similar refractive indices for display layers to reduce visible distortion and improve transparency.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter (for tech-savvy) / Moderate. Source: Tech Current Affairs (2016-17 era news on Samsung/LG prototypes). Not in standard static books.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Science & Technology > Everyday Electronics > Evolution of Display Technologies (CRT → LCD → LED → OLED → MicroLED).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. Backlight Rule: LCDs need a backlight (rigid/thick); OLEDs are 'self-emissive' (no backlight = thin/flexible). 2. Contrast Ratio: OLEDs have 'infinite' contrast (true black) vs LCD's light bleed. 3. Burn-in: OLEDs suffer from organic degradation (burn-in); LCDs do not. 4. Next-Gen: MicroLED (self-emissive but inorganic/long-life) and QLED (Quantum Dots, usually still backlit). 5. E-Ink: Reflective, low power, used in Kindles.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying tech, ask 'What physical constraint does this remove?' LCDs are constrained by the backlight sandwich. Removing it (OLED) logically allows rolling, folding, and transparency. If the physics allows it, the application is 'possible'.
The statement contrasts display substrates (rigid vs flexible); reference [1] explicitly classifies plastics into rigid and flexible categories, which is directly relevant when considering plastic substrates for electronics.
High-yield for UPSC technical or techno-environmental questions: understanding types of plastics helps assess suitability of polymers as device substrates, waste/EPR implications, and policy on plastic usage. Links to manufacturing, materials policy, and waste-management questions; useful for questions comparing material properties and regulatory frameworks.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > Amendment rules eozz > p. 99
For flexible electronic displays on plastic substrates, long-term exposure and material stability matter; reference [7] discusses how synthetic polymers are affected by solar radiation and the need for stabilizers or surface treatments.
Important for answering questions about material selection, lifecycle, and environmental suitability of devices (e.g., consumer electronics outdoors). Connects materials science with environmental policy and technology deployment; enables arguments about protective coatings, durability trade-offs, and EPR considerations.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 19: Ozone Depletion > Effects on materials > p. 272
The statement compares OLED on plastic vs LCD (often on glass); reference [2] highlights that optical behaviour changes when replacing glass with transparent plastic, which is relevant to display optics and performance.
Useful for technical-natured UPSC questions on display technology, optics, and material substitution. Helps frame answers on refractive/optical trade-offs, clarity, and performance when replacing glass with plastics — linking physics fundamentals to applied tech and policy implications.
- Science , class X (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: Light – Reflection and Refraction > 9.3 REFRACTION OF LIGHT > p. 145
Textile manufacture is widely distributed and clothing is a ubiquitous consumer need; this is the industrial context in which any wearable display would be produced and adopted.
High-yield for UPSC because it links geography, industry and manufacturing policy: understanding where and how textiles are produced helps assess feasibility and scale of embedding new technologies in clothing. Useful for questions on industrial location, value chains and technology diffusion.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 10: Locational Factors of Economic Activities > textile industries > p. 32
Evidence mentions LED lamps and basic properties of light—foundational to understanding display technologies that emit light (OLEDs/LEDs) versus those that require backlighting.
Important for technopolicy and science-technology questions: mastering basic distinctions between luminous devices and light behaviour aids evaluation of claims about display types, energy use and suitability for applications like wearables. Enables answering questions on energy efficiency, device design trade-offs and practical deployment.
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: Electricity: Circuits and their Components > LED Lamp > p. 27
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 11: Light: Shadows and Reflections > In a Nutshell > p. 165
A reference frames technology as applied scientific knowledge that enables new products and services (e.g., cameras, GPS), relevant when considering integrating novel displays into clothing.
Crucial for UPSC essays and prelims/mains on innovation, industrial policy and adoption: understanding how technological advances translate into products helps evaluate claims about feasibility, costs and social impact. Connects to topics on manufacturing, digital textiles and technology policy.
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 7: Factors of Production > Technology: An Enabler of Production > p. 176
The references explicitly define transparent, translucent and opaque materials and how much light they transmit, which is central to understanding 'transparent displays'.
High-yield for UPSC science basics: distinguishes material classes that determine whether a display can be seen through. Connects to questions on optics, material properties and real-world tech (e.g., windows, screens). Helps answer conceptual questions about feasibility of see-through devices.
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 11: Light: Shadows and Reflections > Activity 11.3: Let us experiment > p. 157
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 11: Light: Shadows and Reflections > In a Nutshell > p. 165
MicroLEDs. Now that OLED is mainstream, UPSC will look at its successor. MicroLEDs share OLED's self-emissive benefits (high contrast, fast response) but use inorganic materials (Gallium Nitride), solving OLED's major weakness: 'Burn-in' and short lifespan.
The 'Future Possibility' Heuristic. In S&T questions, if statements use modal verbs like 'can be', 'possible to', or 'potential for', and the technology is modern (Nano/Bio/AI/OLED), the statements are 99% likely to be TRUE. It is scientifically risky for an examiner to declare a futuristic application 'impossible' because a lab somewhere might have just done it. Mark All Correct (Option C).
Environment (E-Waste). OLEDs have shorter lifespans (especially the blue organic sub-pixels) compared to LCDs, leading to faster device replacement cycles. This directly impacts 'Extended Producer Responsibility' (EPR) targets under E-Waste Management Rules, as the volume of discarded screens increases.