Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q76 (IAS/2018) History & Culture › Modern India (Pre-1857) › Colonial education policy Official Key

Which of the following led to the introduction of English Education in India ? 1. Charter Act of 1813 2. General Committee of Public Instruction, 1823 3. Orientalist and Anglicist Controversy Select the correct answer using the code given below :

Result
Your answer: —  ·  Correct: D
Explanation

The correct answer is option D because all three factors collectively led to the introduction of English education in India.

The Charter Act of 1813 incorporated the principle of encouraging learned Indians and promoting knowledge of modern sciences, directing the Company[1] to sanction one lakh rupees annually for the revival, promotion and encouragement of literature, learning and science among the natives of India[2]. This laid the financial and legislative foundation for educational development.

The General Committee of Public Instruction was formed in 1823 with the responsibility to guide the East India Company on the matter of education and the medium of instruction. The Committee was split into two groups - the Orientalist group advocated education in vernacular languages while the Anglicists advocated Western education in English[3]. This institutional framework channeled the debate on educational policy.

The Orientalist-Anglicist controversy culminated when Macaulay wrote his famous 'Minute on Indian Education' in 1835, in which he argued for Western education in the English language[3]. Subsequently, the English Education Act was passed by the Council of India in 1835[4], formally introducing English education. All three elements were thus instrumental in this transition.

Sources
  1. [1] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > A Humble beginning by Charter Act of 1813 > p. 564
  2. [2] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 26: Constitutional, Administrative and Judicial Developments > The Charter Act of 1813 > p. 505
  3. [3] History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 5
  4. [4] History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
57%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full view
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. Which of the following led to the introduction of English Education in India ? 1. Charter Act of 1813 2. General Committee of Public In…
At a glance
Origin: From standard books Fairness: High fairness Books / CA: 10/10 · 0/10

This is a classic 'Chain of Causality' question. It does not ask for the final event (Macaulay's Minute) but the legislative root (1813), the institutional body (1823), and the ideological debate (Controversy) that paved the way. If you only memorized '1835', you failed; if you understood the story flow in Spectrum/NCERT, this was free marks.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
Did the Charter Act of 1813 lead to the introduction of English education in India?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > A Humble beginning by Charter Act of 1813 > p. 564
Presence: 5/5
“The Charter Act of 1813 incorporated the principle of encouraging learned Indians and promoting knowledge of modern sciences in the country. The Act directed the Company to sanction one lakh rupees annually for this purpose. However, even this petty amount was not made available till 1823, mainly because of the controversy raged on the question of the direction that this expenditure should take. Meanwhile, efforts of enlightened Indians such as Raja Rammohan Roy bore fruit and a grant was sanctioned for Calcutta College set up in 1817 by educated Bengalis, imparting English education in Western humanities and sciences. The government also set up three Sanskrit colleges at Calcutta, Delhi and Agra.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly links the Charter Act's principle of promoting modern sciences to a sanctioned grant that aided Calcutta College (1817), which imparted English education.
  • Mentions government support measures and the role of Indian reformers (Raja Rammohan Roy) that translated the Act's educational provision into an English-medium institution.
Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 26: Constitutional, Administrative and Judicial Developments > The Charter Act of 1813 > p. 505
Presence: 4/5
“The 1813 Act sought to redress these grievances— ● The Company's monopoly over trade in India ended, but the Company retained the trade with China and the trade in tea. ● The Company's shareholders were given a 10.5 per cent dividend on the revenue of India. ● The Company was to retain the possession of territories and the revenue for 20 years more, without prejudice to the sovereignty of the Crown. (Thus, the constitutional position of the British territories in India was defined explicitly for the first time.) ● Powers of the Board of Control were further enlarged. ● A sum of one lakh rupees was to be set aside for the revival, promotion and encouragement of literature, learning and science among the natives of India, every year. (This was an important statement from the point of State's responsibility for education.) ● The regulations made by the Councils of Madras, Bombay and Calcutta were now required to be laid before the British Parliament.”
Why this source?
  • States the Charter Act of 1813 allocated an annual sum for revival, promotion and encouragement of literature, learning and science among natives — a formal basis for state involvement in education.
  • Provides documentary proof that the Act included educational funding which could enable introduction/spread of modern (including English) education.
Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 120
Presence: 3/5
“the teaching of Western sciences and literature through the medium of English language alone. Lord Macaulay, who was the Law Member of the Governor-General's Council, argued in a famous minute that Indian languages were not sufficiently developed to serve the purpose, and that "Oriental learning was completely inferior to European learning" The Government of India acted quickly, particularly in Bengal, on the decision of 1835 and made English the medium of instruction in its schools and colleges. It opened a few English schools and colleges instead of a large number of elementary schools. This policy was later sharply criticised for neglecting the education of the masses.”
Why this source?
  • Describes the later decisive policy (Macaulay/1835) that made English the medium of instruction, showing the 1813 Act initiated state support while formal English-medium policy was consolidated later.
  • Helps place the 1813 Act in a chronological policy trajectory leading to wider introduction of English education.
Statement 2
Did the General Committee of Public Instruction (1823) lead to the introduction of English education in India?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 5
Presence: 5/5
“T. B. Macaulay was India's first law member of the Governor General in Council from 1834 to 1838. Before Macaulay arrived in India the General Committee of T.B. Macaulay Public Instruction was formed in 1823 with the responsibility to guide the East India Company on the matter of education and the medium of instruction. The Committee was split into two groups. The Orientalist group advocated education in vernacular languages. The Anglicists advocated Western education in English. Macaulay was on the side of Anglicists and wrote his famous 'Minute on Indian Education' in 1835. In this Minute, he argued for Western education in the English language.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly states the General Committee (formed 1823) split into Orientalists and Anglicists, with Anglicists advocating Western education in English.
  • Notes T. B. Macaulay sided with the Anglicists and later wrote the 1835 Minute promoting English — showing the Committee contained the pro-English faction that influenced policy.
History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
Presence: 4/5
“(b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education The colonial government aided the spread of modern education in India for a different reason than educating and empowering the Indians. To administer a large colony like India, the British needed a large number of personnel to work for them. It was impossible for the British to import the educated lot, needed in such large numbers, from Britain. With this aim, the English Education Act was passed by the Council of India in 1835. T.B. Macaulay drafted this system of education introduced in India.”
Why this source?
  • Links the English Education Act of 1835 and states T. B. Macaulay drafted the education system introduced in India.
  • Shows a clear institutional step (1835 Act) through which English education was formally introduced after the Committee-era debate.
Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Lord Macaulay's Minute (1835) > p. 565
Presence: 4/5
“through the medium of English language alone. Lord Macaulay held the view that "Indian learning was inferior to European learning"—which was true as far as physical and social sciences in the contemporary stage were concerned. The government soon made English as the medium of instruction in its schools and colleges and opened a few English schools and colleges instead of a large number of elementary schools, thus neglecting mass education. The British planned to educate a small section of upper and middle classes, thus creating a class "Indian in blood and colour but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect" who would act as interpreters between the government and masses and would enrich the vernaculars by which knowledge of Western sciences and literature would reach the masses.”
Why this source?
  • States the government soon made English the medium of instruction following Macaulay's Minute (1835).
  • Provides outcome evidence that Macaulay's advocacy — rooted in the Anglicist position present in the Committee — led to adoption of English-medium education.
Statement 3
Did the Orientalist and Anglicist controversy lead to the introduction of English education in India?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 120
Presence: 5/5
“the teaching of Western sciences and literature through the medium of English language alone. Lord Macaulay, who was the Law Member of the Governor-General's Council, argued in a famous minute that Indian languages were not sufficiently developed to serve the purpose, and that "Oriental learning was completely inferior to European learning" The Government of India acted quickly, particularly in Bengal, on the decision of 1835 and made English the medium of instruction in its schools and colleges. It opened a few English schools and colleges instead of a large number of elementary schools. This policy was later sharply criticised for neglecting the education of the masses.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly names Macaulay's argument that Indian languages were inadequate and records government action in 1835 to make English the medium of instruction.
  • Links the Anglicist position (preference for English/Western sciences) to the concrete policy of opening English schools and colleges.
History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
Presence: 5/5
“(b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education The colonial government aided the spread of modern education in India for a different reason than educating and empowering the Indians. To administer a large colony like India, the British needed a large number of personnel to work for them. It was impossible for the British to import the educated lot, needed in such large numbers, from Britain. With this aim, the English Education Act was passed by the Council of India in 1835. T.B. Macaulay drafted this system of education introduced in India.”
Why this source?
  • States the English Education Act (1835) and credits T. B. Macaulay with drafting the system introduced in India.
  • Frames the policy as driven by colonial administrative needs to produce English-educated personnel.
Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Lord Macaulay's Minute (1835) > p. 565
Presence: 5/5
“through the medium of English language alone. Lord Macaulay held the view that "Indian learning was inferior to European learning"—which was true as far as physical and social sciences in the contemporary stage were concerned. The government soon made English as the medium of instruction in its schools and colleges and opened a few English schools and colleges instead of a large number of elementary schools, thus neglecting mass education. The British planned to educate a small section of upper and middle classes, thus creating a class "Indian in blood and colour but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect" who would act as interpreters between the government and masses and would enrich the vernaculars by which knowledge of Western sciences and literature would reach the masses.”
Why this source?
  • Describes Lord Macaulay's Minute advocating English as medium and records the government's adoption of English instruction.
  • Explains the intent to create a small English-educated class to serve as intermediaries, showing the policy outcome of the controversy.
Pattern takeaway: UPSC Modern History questions often test the 'Build-up' rather than the 'Event'. When studying a major policy (Education, Famine, Civil Service), map the sequence: Legislation → Committee/Commission → Debate → Final Implementation.
How you should have studied
  1. [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly covered in Spectrum (Chapter: Development of Education) and Old NCERT (Bipan Chandra).
  2. [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Evolution of British Education Policy (Phase 1: 1813–1854).
  3. [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the timeline of commissions: Wood's Despatch (1854, Magna Carta) → Hunter Commission (1882, Primary/Secondary) → Raleigh Commission (1902, Universities) → Sadler Commission (1917, 10+2+3) → Hartog Committee (1929, Quality over Quantity) → Wardha Scheme (1937, Basic Education).
  4. [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not view history as isolated dates. View it as a process: The Act (1813) provided the money; the Committee (1823) held the money; the Controversy (Orientalist vs Anglicist) delayed the spending; Macaulay (1835) broke the deadlock. The question rewards understanding the *process*, not just the *result*.
Concept hooks from this question
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S1
👉 Charter Act of 1813 — state funding for education
💡 The insight

The Act explicitly set aside annual funds for promotion of literature, learning and science, providing an official basis for colonial involvement in modern education (references [4], [1]).

High-yield for UPSC because it links legislation to social policy; useful for questions on evolution of colonial education policy and state responsibility. Master by memorizing the Act's key provisions, comparing with later Acts (e.g., 1833, 1853) and explaining policy continuity vs change.

📚 Reading List :
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 26: Constitutional, Administrative and Judicial Developments > The Charter Act of 1813 > p. 505
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > A Humble beginning by Charter Act of 1813 > p. 564
🔗 Anchor: "Did the Charter Act of 1813 lead to the introduction of English education in Ind..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S1
👉 Role of reformers & early institutions (Calcutta College, 1817)
💡 The insight

Evidence shows enlightened Indians (Raja Rammohan Roy) and a grant led to establishment of Calcutta College which imparted English education soon after the 1813 Act (reference [1]).

Important for answering questions about indigenous agency in colonial reforms and institutional history; helps connect social reformers, early colleges, and the gradual spread of English education. Study by mapping key reformers to institutions and years.

📚 Reading List :
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > A Humble beginning by Charter Act of 1813 > p. 564
🔗 Anchor: "Did the Charter Act of 1813 lead to the introduction of English education in Ind..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S1
👉 Macaulay Minute & formalisation of English-medium policy (1835)
💡 The insight

References show that while 1813 provided funds and encouragement, the formal English-medium policy was articulated and implemented in 1835 (references [3], [5]).

Vital for chronology-based questions distinguishing initiation vs formal policy adoption; explains how initial funding led to eventual systemic change. Learn the sequence (1813 → grants/early institutions → 1835 Macaulay) to answer comparative/causal questions.

📚 Reading List :
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
  • Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 120
🔗 Anchor: "Did the Charter Act of 1813 lead to the introduction of English education in Ind..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S2
👉 Orientalist–Anglicist controversy
💡 The insight

The General Committee (1823) contained these two factions; their opposing views on medium and content of education directly shaped subsequent policy.

High-yield for UPSC: explains the ideological origins of colonial education policy and appears in questions on education reforms and cultural debates. Connects to broader themes (vernacular education, cultural policies). Prepare by comparing factional aims and outcomes to answer 'why' and 'how' questions on policy shifts.

📚 Reading List :
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 5
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy > p. 564
🔗 Anchor: "Did the General Committee of Public Instruction (1823) lead to the introduction ..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S2
👉 Macaulay's Minute and the English Education Act (1835)
💡 The insight

Macaulay (an Anglicist) produced the 1835 Minute and drafted the system that became law in 1835, directly linking Committee-era debates to the formal introduction of English education.

Essential: ties a primary document (Macaulay's Minute) to legislative change (1835 Act). Frequently asked in mains/ethics/modern history—useful for causation questions and source-based answers. Study the Minute's aims, timeline, and policy consequences.

📚 Reading List :
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 5
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Lord Macaulay's Minute (1835) > p. 565
🔗 Anchor: "Did the General Committee of Public Instruction (1823) lead to the introduction ..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S2
👉 Colonial administrative motive behind English-medium education
💡 The insight

Sources state the British aimed to create a class to serve administration and made English the language of official employment, explaining the practical reason behind adopting English.

Strategically important for UPSC essays and polity/history linkage questions: explains 'why' beyond ideology — administrative and economic motives. Links to topics on bureaucracy, language policy, and social impact; practice framing cause–effect in answers.

📚 Reading List :
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Evaluation of British Policy on Education > p. 573
🔗 Anchor: "Did the General Committee of Public Instruction (1823) lead to the introduction ..."
📌 Adjacent topic to master
S3
👉 Macaulay's Minute (1835) and the English Education Act
💡 The insight

These references directly cite Macaulay's minute and the 1835 policy that established English-medium education in colonial India.

High-yield for UPSC history: explains the policy turning point in colonial education, its legislative origin, and concrete administrative outcomes. Connects to topics on colonial administration, social impact of education, and rise of Indian intelligentsia. Useful for essay and prelims/GS mains questions on education policy and colonial state motives.

📚 Reading List :
  • Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 6: Administrative Organisation and Social and Cultural Policy > Spread of Modern Education > p. 120
  • History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > b) Contribution of Colonial State: Macaulay System of Education > p. 4
  • Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 30: Development of Education > Lord Macaulay's Minute (1835) > p. 565
🔗 Anchor: "Did the Orientalist and Anglicist controversy lead to the introduction of Englis..."
🌑 The Hidden Trap

The specific protagonists of the controversy often appear in options: H.T. Prinsep was the leader of the 'Orientalist' faction (supporting vernaculars/Sanskrit), while Macaulay led the 'Anglicists'. The policy adopted was the 'Downward Filtration Theory' (educate the few to filter down to the masses), which was eventually rejected by Wood's Despatch in 1854.

⚡ Elimination Cheat Code

Use 'Causal Chain Logic'. The Controversy (3) could not exist without the Committee (2) to host it. The Committee (2) could not function without the Funding provided by the Act (1). Since they are historically dependent links in the same chain leading to the result, the answer must include all of them.

🔗 Mains Connection

Link this historical debate to GS-2 (Education) and the NEP 2020. The current debate on 'Mother Tongue vs English' as the medium of instruction is a direct continuation of the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy of the 1830s.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CAPF · 2017 · Q32 Relevance score: 2.30

Which one of the following statements about the English Education Act of 1835 is NOT correct ?

NDA-I · 2022 · Q71 Relevance score: 2.13

The real beginning of western education in India can be dated from

NDA-I · 2016 · Q85 Relevance score: 0.50

Which one among the following Acts for the first time allowed Indians, at least theoretically, entry to higher posts in British Indian administration ?

IAS · 2019 · Q4 Relevance score: 0.20

Consider the following statements about 'the Charter Act of 1813' : 1. It ended the trade monopoly of the East India Company in India except for trade in tea and trade with China. 2. It asserted the sovereignty of the British Crown over the Indian territories held by the Company. 3. The revenues of India were now controlled by the British Parliament. Which of the statements given above are correct?

CAPF · 2025 · Q26 Relevance score: -1.29

Match List-I with List-II and select the answer using the code given below the Lists : List-I (Act of the British Parliament) A. The Pitt's India Act, 1784 B. The Charter Act, 1813 C. The Charter Act, 1833 D. The Charter Act, 1853 List-II (Key Provision) 1. Enlargement of the Governor-General's Legislative Council 2. Discrimination against Indians removed in matters of employment and higher service 3. Board set up by the Crown to control affairs of India 4. Termination of monopoly of East India Company over Indian trade Code : (a) A B C D 1 4 2 3 (b) A B C D 1 2 4 3 (c) A B C D 3 4 2 1 (d) A B C D 3 2 4 1