Question map
In the Indian context, what is the implication of ratifying the 'Additional Protocol' with the 'International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)' ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A. India agreed to separate its civil and military nuclear facilities and to place all its civil nuclear facilities under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards[2], and the Additional Protocol came into force on 25 July 2014, giving the IAEA enhanced access to India's civil power facilities[3]. This means that ratifying the Additional Protocol brings civilian nuclear reactors under IAEA safeguards and inspection.
Option B is incorrect because while safeguards apply to some of their activities, others remain beyond scrutiny[4], indicating that military installations are not subject to IAEA inspection. Option C is misleading because the IAEA approved the safeguards agreement with India, after which the United States approached the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to grant a waiver to India to commence civilian nuclear trade. The 48-nation NSG granted the waiver to India on September 6, 2008, allowing it to access civilian nuclear technology and fuel from other countries[5]—the NSG waiver was a separate process, not an automatic implication of the Additional Protocol. Option D is incorrect as the Additional Protocol does not confer automatic NSG membership.
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93United_States_Civil_Nuclear_Agreement
- [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93United_States_Civil_Nuclear_Agreement
- [3] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/non-proliferation/safeguards-to-prevent-nuclear-proliferation
- [4] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/non-proliferation/safeguards-to-prevent-nuclear-proliferation
- [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93United_States_Civil_Nuclear_Agreement
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question tests the 'Scope & Definition' of a specific diplomatic instrument. It demands you distinguish between a technical inspection tool (IAEA Protocol) and a political status (NSG Membership). If you understood the core logic of the Indo-US Nuclear Deal (Separation Plan), this was straightforward.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does India's ratification of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Additional Protocol place India's civilian nuclear reactors under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 2: Does India's ratification of the IAEA Additional Protocol place India's military nuclear installations under inspection by the IAEA?
- Statement 3: Does India's ratification of the IAEA Additional Protocol grant India the privilege to purchase uranium from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) or its members?
- Statement 4: Does India's ratification of the IAEA Additional Protocol automatically make India a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG)?
States that the IAEA 'regularly inspect nuclear facilities ... to ensure that civilian reactors are not being used for military purposes' — establishes the IAEA's role in safeguarding civilian reactors.
A student could use this rule plus knowledge of what the Additional Protocol does (expanded inspection/access) to infer that acceptance of IAEA measures can increase oversight of civilian reactors.
Says the Indo‑US civilian nuclear agreement required India to 'allow its civil nuclear reactors to be inspected by the IAEA' as a condition for access to fuel and technology.
One could extend this by checking whether ratifying the Additional Protocol was the specific legal step that fulfilled or expanded those IAEA inspection obligations under the 2008 deal.
Notes the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) was formed to check proliferation after India's tests, implying supplier regimes link civilian cooperation/supply to non‑proliferation safeguards.
A student could combine this with the fact that NSG/ suppliers often require IAEA safeguards/Protocols as conditions for nuclear commerce to evaluate whether India’s ratification affects safeguards status.
Lists India's major nuclear power plants and centres, which identifies the civilian reactors that would be subject to any IAEA safeguards or additional oversight.
Using a map or reactor list one could identify which specific facilities might fall under IAEA safeguards if the Additional Protocol or similar arrangements apply.
Describes India's position favouring a 'universal and non-discriminatory nonproliferation regime' — a policy context for selectively accepting international safeguards.
A student could use this to assess whether India’s ratification is consistent with a policy of accepting safeguards for some civilian activities while resisting blanket treaties.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.