Question map
With reference to the election of the President of India, consider the following statements : 1. The value of the vote of each MLA varies from State to State. 2. The value of the vote of MPs of the Lok Sabha is more than the value of the vote of MPs of the Rajya Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (1 only).
**Statement 1 is correct:** The value of vote of each MLA varies from state to state, as shown in the Presidential Election 2022 data where Andhra Pradesh MLAs have a value of 159 per vote, while Arunachal Pradesh MLAs have a value of 8 per vote[1]. This variation occurs because the value of an MLA's vote is calculated based on the state's population divided by the number of elected MLAs, which differs across states.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The value of the vote of an MP is calculated as the total value of votes of all MLAs of all states divided by the total number of elected members of Parliament[2]. This means all MPs—whether from Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha—have the same vote value in presidential elections. There is no distinction between the vote values of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs.
Therefore, only statement 1 is correct, making option A the right answer.
Sources- [1] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 201
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 187
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Sitter' from standard static sources (Laxmikanth). It tests the operational mechanics of Article 55 rather than just the theory. If you only memorized 'who votes' but ignored 'how the vote is valued', you would struggle here.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the election of the President of India, does the value of the vote of each Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) vary from state to state?
- Statement 2: In the election of the President of India, is the value of the vote of a Lok Sabha Member of Parliament greater than the value of the vote of a Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament?
- Contains a state-wise table listing the 'value of vote of each MLA' with different numeric values for different states (e.g., Andhra Pradesh = 159; Arunachal Pradesh = 8).
- Shows total value for each state computed as (value per MLA × number of MLAs), demonstrating distinct per-MLA values across states.
- Refers to an illustration of the value of votes of each MLA of the states, indicating that MLA vote-values are specified state-wise in official calculations.
- Explains the broader context of vote-value calculations used in the presidential election, linking MLA vote-values to the electoral arithmetic.
Gives the general formula: Value of the vote of an MP = Total value of votes of all MLAs of all states / Total number of elected members of Parliament.
A student can use this rule plus the counts of MPs to infer that the per-MP value is the same for all MPs regardless of house.
Repeats the same formula (confirming it as a stated rule), emphasising the per-MP value depends on aggregate MLA value and total MPs.
Combine with the separate counts of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha members to see the per-MP value does not distinguish between LS and RS.
Provides concrete totals used in calculation (Total MPs = Lok Sabha 543 + Rajya Sabha 233 = 776) and shows a computed 'value of each vote of members of Parliament'.
Using these totals, a student can calculate per-MP vote value and note it is a single figure for all MPs, not different by house.
Same numeric illustration as [1] (total MPs = 776 and a single 'value of each vote' for MPs) reinforcing that all MPs share that value.
A student could compare the single MP vote value with MLA vote values (from other parts) to judge relative weights but not differentiate LS vs RS.
Explains the electoral college composition: MPs from both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are part of the same electoral college for the President.
Knowing both houses' MPs participate in the same college supports applying the single-MP-value formula to all MPs together when testing the statement.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly solvable from Laxmikanth, Chapter 18 (President). No current affairs required.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Article 55 (Manner of Election of President). The core theme is 'Parity' between the Union and the States.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. Base Population: 1971 Census (frozen by 84th Amendment). 2. Nomination: 50 proposers + 50 seconders (vs 20+20 for VP). 3. Dispute: Decided by Supreme Court (Article 71), decision is final. 4. Security Deposit: ₹15,000 (forfeited if <1/6th votes polled). 5. Anti-Defection: Does NOT apply to Presidential elections (open ballot not allowed, but no whip).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying Constitutional bodies, move beyond 'Composition' to 'Computation'. UPSC loves asking about the *weightage* and *math* behind the seats (e.g., Delimitation, Vote Value) because that is where the federal balance lies.
The provided table explicitly lists different numeric 'value of vote of each MLA' for individual states, showing variation across states.
High-yield for UPSC prelims/GS: questions often ask whether MLA vote-values are uniform or vary and may require reading/interpreting state-wise tables. It connects to understanding the electoral college and numerical problems on presidential election vote-weighting; practice with such tables enables quick elimination in MCQs and accurate computation in mains-type numerical questions.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 201
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 201
Reference gives the formula linking total value of all MLAs to the value of each MP, showing interdependence between MLA totals and MP vote value.
Important for solving multi-step numerical questions on the presidential election where MP vote-value must be computed from MLA totals. Mastery helps answer calculation-style prelims questions and conceptual mains questions on the composition/weighting of the electoral college.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 187
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 202
References identify that the electoral college comprises MLAs and MPs, which is the framework within which per-MLA vote-values matter.
Foundational concept: many questions combine composition with vote-weight calculations. Knowing who the electors are is essential before delving into vote-value computations or constitutional provisions—useful across prelims and mains interlinked topics (federalism, elections, constitutional provisions).
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: Universal Franchise and India’s Electoral System > Election of the President of India > p. 136
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 201
References give the formula: value of each MP's vote = total value of all MLAs' votes ÷ total number of elected MPs.
High-yield for UPSC: enables computation of MP vote value for presidential election problems and links state MLA weightage to national calculation; useful for numerical and conceptual questions on electoral college mechanics.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 187
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 187
References enumerate who forms the electoral college — MPs (both houses) plus MLAs — and give counts used in calculations.
Important for conceptual clarity: distinguishes MPs vs MLAs roles, shows why MLA totals affect MP vote value; frequently tested in polity questions about presidential election procedure and vote weightage.
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: Universal Franchise and India’s Electoral System > Election of the President of India > p. 136
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 202
The formula and the numeric illustration treat 'members of Parliament' as a single pool, implying all MPs have the same vote value regardless of house.
Prevents a common misconception that Lok Sabha MPs carry greater individual weight; useful for direct-answer conceptual questions and for setting up correct calculations in problems involving vote totals.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 202
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 187
The '1971 Census' Trap. The value of the vote is calculated based on the 1971 population, not the current one, to encourage population control. A future statement might trick you by saying 'based on the latest published census'.
The 'Bicameral Equality' Logic. If Lok Sabha MPs had a higher vote value than Rajya Sabha MPs (Statement 2), the President would become a representative of the popular majority (Government), undermining the Rajya Sabha's role as the Council of States. Since the President is the Head of State (Federal Head), not Head of Government, both Houses must logically have equal weight.
Federalism (Mains GS2): The formula (Total Value of MPs = Total Value of all MLAs) is a mathematical expression of Federal Parity. It ensures the Union Parliament has exactly equal weight to all State Assemblies combined, preventing the President from being solely a 'Central' agent.