Question map
In India, why are some nuclear reactors kept under "IAEA Safeguards" while others are not ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2. In India, the distinction between nuclear reactors under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Safeguards and those outside them is based on the source of fuel used.
- Imported Uranium: Reactors that rely on imported fuel are mandatory signatories to the Separation Plan agreed upon after the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal. To ensure imported nuclear material is used strictly for peaceful civilian purposes and not diverted for military use, these reactors are placed under IAEA monitoring.
- Domestic Uranium: Reactors using indigenous uranium reserves are kept outside the safeguards to maintain India’s strategic autonomy and support its nuclear weapons program.
Why other options are incorrect: Option 1 is wrong as thorium-based reactors are still experimental. Options 3 and 4 are incorrect because all nuclear power plants in India are currently state-owned and operated by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL); foreign private ownership is not permitted under current laws.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is not a Science question; it is a History/IR question disguised as Science. It tests the core 'Quid Pro Quo' of the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal (2008) covered in Spectrum and NCERT Pol Sci. The 'Separation Plan' explicitly traded access to imported fuel for IAEA safeguards.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the type of nuclear fuel (uranium versus thorium) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 2: Does the source of uranium (imported versus domestically produced) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 3: Does operation by a foreign enterprise versus a domestic enterprise determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 4: Does ownership (state-owned versus privately-owned) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Directly states India agreed to put most of its power reactors under IAEA safeguards as part of a deal and designates 14 reactors as civilian and under full safeguards.
- Implies placement is determined by the political/agreement designation and fuel origin, not simply by fuel type.
- Explains that IAEA inspection frequency and significant-quantity/timeliness goals vary by type of nuclear material.
- Indicates that material type affects safeguards measures and verification intensity, but not the fundamental decision of whether a reactor is placed under safeguards.
- Notes that establishing safeguards for certain reactor types has been more resource-intensive because of more complex fuel forms.
- Suggests fuel form affects verification challenges and implementation effort, rather than the basic determination of placement under safeguards.
States that the IAEA inspects nuclear facilities 'to ensure that civilian reactors are not being used for military purposes' — i.e., inspections are linked to civilian vs military status.
A student could use this civilian/military distinction to check whether safeguarded reactors are categorized by purpose rather than by fuel type.
Indo‑US civil nuclear agreement required India 'to allow its civil nuclear reactors to be inspected by the IAEA' in return for fuel/technology, again linking safeguards to 'civil' reactors.
One could map which Indian reactors were declared civil under the deal and see if those (regardless of uranium/thorium) entered safeguards.
States India produces nuclear energy 'from uranium and thorium' and lists existing plants, showing that both fuels are in domestic use.
A student can list reactors using uranium vs thorium and then check whether IAEA inspection status correlates with fuel type or with civil/military designation.
Notes thorium is used as nuclear fuel and gives an example (Kakrapar‑1) of a reactor using thorium, providing a concrete fuel‑type example.
Use the Kakrapar‑1 example to look up whether that reactor is under safeguards (using external sources) to test whether thorium use predicts safeguards status.
Mentions India has multiple nuclear power plants and that nuclear energy in India comes from uranium and thorium, reinforcing that fuel types coexist across the civil programme.
Compare the roster of Indian plants (fuel used) with which were opened to IAEA inspection to see if fuel correlates with safeguards placement.
- States India agreed to put most nuclear power reactors under IAEA safeguards, linking safeguards status to specific designations.
- Specifically allows reprocessing of US-origin and other foreign-sourced nuclear fuel under IAEA safeguards, tying foreign-sourced fuel to safeguarded handling.
- Identifies that fuel arising from 14 reactors designated as unambiguously civilian would be under full IAEA safeguards, implying source/designation affects safeguards application.
Explicit example: the Indo–US civilian nuclear agreement linked access to foreign fuel/technology with a requirement to allow civil reactors to be inspected by the IAEA.
A student could infer that supplier agreements can condition access to fuel/technology on safeguards, so checking which reactors used imported fuel/tech (or were part of such deals) could indicate which were placed under safeguards.
States the IAEA's role: it inspects nuclear facilities to ensure civilian reactors are not used for military purposes.
Combine this rule with knowledge of which reactors are designated 'civilian' vs military/dual-use to judge whether safeguards apply irrespective of fuel source.
Historical example where foreign suppliers (Canada, US) reacted when material/technology they supplied was involved in a weapons test, leading to supplier restrictions (formation of the Nuclear Suppliers Group).
Use this pattern to reason that suppliers may impose post-supply restrictions (including safeguards) on facilities that use their equipment or material, so identifying supplier-origin of reactors/material can be telling.
States India has been largely dependent on other countries for the supply of uranium.
A student could cross-check which plants rely on imported uranium and see if those plants were subject to safeguards or international agreements tied to imports.
Documents domestic uranium deposits and mining locations, showing India also produces indigenous uranium.
One can contrast reactors fueled by indigenous uranium versus reactors using imported fuel/technology to test whether safeguards correlate with fuel origin.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
States that IAEA teams regularly inspect nuclear facilities to ensure civilian reactors are not used for military purposes, giving a general rule that civilian status triggers IAEA inspections.
A student could combine this with knowledge of which plants are designated 'civilian' to judge whether operator nationality (foreign vs domestic) is a deciding factor.
Says the Indo–US civilian nuclear agreement gave India access to US fuel/technology but required allowing its civil nuclear reactors to be inspected by the IAEA, showing supplier/technology agreements can lead to safeguards.
A student could check whether reactors using foreign-supplied technology or fuel were the ones specifically subject to IAEA inspection under such agreements.
Notes the CIRUS reactor's plutonium came from a Canadian-supplied reactor and that foreign supply led to international displeasure and suspension of assistance, suggesting foreign provision/supply creates external expectations or pressures related to oversight.
A student might examine whether reactors built or supplied by foreign countries carried additional obligations or scrutiny (e.g., safeguards) compared with wholly indigenous ones.
States India planned new 'indigenous' nuclear plants, implying a distinction between indigenous (domestic) reactors and those involving foreign technology or assistance.
A student could use this domestic/indigenous vs foreign-built distinction to investigate if 'indigenous' reactors were treated differently under IAEA arrangements than foreign-linked ones.
Defines 'domestic/economic territory' as including assets operated by residents even if abroad, giving a rule about how 'domestic' is legally construed (operator/residency vs location).
A student could apply this operator-based definition to ask whether safeguards follow the operator's nationality rather than the reactor's physical location or ownership.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
States that the IAEA inspects nuclear facilities to ensure civilian reactors are not used for military purposes — emphasis on 'civilian' status as the inspection trigger.
A student could infer that the civil/military purpose, not the owner, is the criterion and check whether Indian reactors under safeguards are classified as civilian.
Notes the Indo–US civilian nuclear agreement required India to allow its civil nuclear reactors to be inspected by the IAEA.
One could use this example to test whether IAEA safeguards in India are tied to civil-use reactors (regardless of public or private ownership) by listing reactors covered by the agreement.
Explains that generation and distribution of energy in India is largely with state governments, implying many nuclear power assets may be publicly owned.
A student could combine this with clues that safeguards target civilian reactors to ask whether most safeguarded Indian reactors are state-owned simply because most civil energy plants are state-owned.
Lists current and planned nuclear power plants and states the government cleared new plant construction, indicating active central government role in civil nuclear power.
This supports checking whether plants put under safeguards correspond to government-built/operated civil plants, testing if ownership or civil role is the deciding factor.
Highlights public concern linking nuclear plants with weapons development, reinforcing the importance of distinguishing civilian versus military uses when discussing oversight.
A student might use this to explore whether safeguards are applied to alleviate such concerns about civilian plants, irrespective of ownership.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Found in Spectrum (Modern History, Ch: Foreign Relations) and NCERT Class XII (Contemporary World Politics). The link between 'Imported Fuel' and 'Inspections' is the heart of the 123 Agreement.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Separation Plan' (2006). India agreed to separate Civil (Safeguarded) facilities from Military (Strategic) ones to gain access to the global nuclear market.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. Safeguarded Reactors: RAPS (Rawatbhata), TAPS (Tarapur), KKNPP (Kudankulam). 2. Strategic Reactors: Dhruva (BARC), Kalpakkam (MAPS - some units). 3. India Specific Safeguards Agreement (ISSA). 4. The 'Additional Protocol' (ratified 2014). 5. NSG Waiver (2008).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying treaties, map the 'Trade-off'. India wanted Uranium (Option B); the World wanted Oversight (The Question). The answer lies in the intersection of what we needed (Imports) and what we gave (Safeguards).
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
IAEA inspections are aimed at ensuring civilian reactors are not diverted to military purposes.
High-yield for UPSC: understanding the mandate of the IAEA is central to questions on nuclear non-proliferation, international inspections, and India's civil nuclear engagements. It connects to international law, security studies, and diplomacy questions where India’s civilian/military nuclear distinction matters.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: International Organisations > IAEA > p. 58
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Foreign Relations > p. 761
The Indo‑US civilian nuclear agreement required India to permit IAEA inspection of its civil nuclear reactors.
Important for foreign policy and contemporary history: this concept explains negotiated obligations, ties nuclear commerce to safeguards, and helps answer questions on strategic partnerships, NSG/IAEA processes, and domestic policy implications of international agreements.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Foreign Relations > p. 761
India uses both uranium and thorium as nuclear fuels and possesses significant thorium-bearing monazite sands alongside uranium deposits.
Valuable for geography and energy security topics: knowing fuel types and their geographic distribution supports answers on India’s nuclear fuel strategy, indigenous resource dependence, and long-term energy planning. It links to resource geography, energy policy, and technological choices in the nuclear sector.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 9: Distribution of World Natural Resources > thorium > p. 40
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 8: Energy Resources > Nuclear Energy > p. 26
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Mineral and Energy Resources > Nuclear Energy Resources > p. 61
The IAEA's role includes inspecting civilian reactors to ensure they are not used for military purposes.
High-yield for polity and international relations: understanding the IAEA's inspection mandate explains international safeguards, non-proliferation diplomacy, and treaty-based verification mechanisms. It links to questions on global governance, arms control, and India’s international nuclear dealings.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: International Organisations > IAEA > p. 58
Access to foreign nuclear fuel and technology has in at least one case been tied to accepting IAEA inspections of civil reactors.
Important for contemporary polity and foreign policy topics: explains how bilateral agreements (e.g., nuclear cooperation) translate into commitments on inspections and non-proliferation. Useful for questions on India–US nuclear cooperation, nuclear diplomacy, and conditionality in international agreements.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Foreign Relations > p. 761
India has both domestic uranium deposits and reliance on external suppliers for uranium.
Relevant for topics on energy security and strategic autonomy: knowing domestic reserves vs import dependence helps explain policy choices in nuclear sourcing, international negotiations, and technology partnerships. Connects geography (mineral resources) with strategic foreign policy and energy planning questions.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 6: Environmental Degradation and Management > iii) nuclear Energy > p. 52
The IAEA conducts inspections of nuclear facilities to verify that civilian reactors are not being used for military purposes.
High-yield for questions on international organisations and nuclear non‑proliferation; links to topics on global governance, verification mechanisms, and India’s international obligations. Mastering this helps answer questions about the role and limits of multilateral nuclear oversight.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: International Organisations > IAEA > p. 58
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'India-Specific Safeguards Agreement' (ISSA) is unique because it is 'umbrella' based, not 'comprehensive' like NPT signatories. The next logical question is on the 'Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act (CLNDA), 2010', specifically Section 17(b) regarding supplier liability.
Legal Monopoly Hack: In India, Atomic Energy is a strict Central Government monopoly under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Private companies (Option D) and Foreign enterprises (Option C) are legally barred from operating reactors. This eliminates C and D instantly. Option A is weak because Thorium is experimental (Stage 3). Option B is the only viable administrative distinction.
Mains GS3 (Energy Security) + GS2 (IR): This distinction represents 'Strategic Autonomy'. We accept safeguards on imported fuel reactors to power the grid, but keep domestic fuel reactors outside to maintain a sovereign fissile material stockpile for the strategic (weapons) program.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.