Question map
In India, why are some nuclear reactors kept under "IAEA Safeguards" while others are not ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2. In India, the distinction between nuclear reactors under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Safeguards and those outside them is based on the source of fuel used.
- Imported Uranium: Reactors that rely on imported fuel are mandatory signatories to the Separation Plan agreed upon after the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal. To ensure imported nuclear material is used strictly for peaceful civilian purposes and not diverted for military use, these reactors are placed under IAEA monitoring.
- Domestic Uranium: Reactors using indigenous uranium reserves are kept outside the safeguards to maintain India’s strategic autonomy and support its nuclear weapons program.
Why other options are incorrect: Option 1 is wrong as thorium-based reactors are still experimental. Options 3 and 4 are incorrect because all nuclear power plants in India are currently state-owned and operated by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL); foreign private ownership is not permitted under current laws.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is not a Science question; it is a History/IR question disguised as Science. It tests the core 'Quid Pro Quo' of the Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal (2008) covered in Spectrum and NCERT Pol Sci. The 'Separation Plan' explicitly traded access to imported fuel for IAEA safeguards.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the type of nuclear fuel (uranium versus thorium) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 2: Does the source of uranium (imported versus domestically produced) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 3: Does operation by a foreign enterprise versus a domestic enterprise determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Statement 4: Does ownership (state-owned versus privately-owned) determine whether an Indian nuclear reactor is placed under IAEA safeguards?
- Directly states India agreed to put most of its power reactors under IAEA safeguards as part of a deal and designates 14 reactors as civilian and under full safeguards.
- Implies placement is determined by the political/agreement designation and fuel origin, not simply by fuel type.
- Explains that IAEA inspection frequency and significant-quantity/timeliness goals vary by type of nuclear material.
- Indicates that material type affects safeguards measures and verification intensity, but not the fundamental decision of whether a reactor is placed under safeguards.
- Notes that establishing safeguards for certain reactor types has been more resource-intensive because of more complex fuel forms.
- Suggests fuel form affects verification challenges and implementation effort, rather than the basic determination of placement under safeguards.
States that the IAEA inspects nuclear facilities 'to ensure that civilian reactors are not being used for military purposes' — i.e., inspections are linked to civilian vs military status.
A student could use this civilian/military distinction to check whether safeguarded reactors are categorized by purpose rather than by fuel type.
Indo‑US civil nuclear agreement required India 'to allow its civil nuclear reactors to be inspected by the IAEA' in return for fuel/technology, again linking safeguards to 'civil' reactors.
One could map which Indian reactors were declared civil under the deal and see if those (regardless of uranium/thorium) entered safeguards.
States India produces nuclear energy 'from uranium and thorium' and lists existing plants, showing that both fuels are in domestic use.
A student can list reactors using uranium vs thorium and then check whether IAEA inspection status correlates with fuel type or with civil/military designation.
Notes thorium is used as nuclear fuel and gives an example (Kakrapar‑1) of a reactor using thorium, providing a concrete fuel‑type example.
Use the Kakrapar‑1 example to look up whether that reactor is under safeguards (using external sources) to test whether thorium use predicts safeguards status.
Mentions India has multiple nuclear power plants and that nuclear energy in India comes from uranium and thorium, reinforcing that fuel types coexist across the civil programme.
Compare the roster of Indian plants (fuel used) with which were opened to IAEA inspection to see if fuel correlates with safeguards placement.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.